Integrated aerosol deposition and epithelial transport in intranasal antiemetic dry powders.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Patrick He, Chun Yuen Jerry Wong, Nicole Leung, Genevieve Long, Maria Wilson, Louise Rawcliffe, Hui Xin Ong, Daniela Traini
{"title":"Integrated aerosol deposition and epithelial transport in intranasal antiemetic dry powders.","authors":"Patrick He, Chun Yuen Jerry Wong, Nicole Leung, Genevieve Long, Maria Wilson, Louise Rawcliffe, Hui Xin Ong, Daniela Traini","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpharm.2026.127596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intranasal dry powder delivery offers a non-invasive route for rapid systemic drug absorption and may be particularly beneficial for antiemetic therapy when oral administration is compromised. However, conventional in vitro tools typically assess aerosol deposition or epithelial permeability in isolation, limiting their ability to discriminate formulation-dependent transport behaviour. Two spray-dried formulations, differing only in the presence or absence of a non-ionic surfactant, were characterised for physicochemical properties and aerosol performance, followed by biological evaluation using an air liquid interface (ALI) RPMI-2650 nasal epithelial model. Aerosol delivery was performed using a nasal powder device coupled to a modified expansion chamber and cascade impactor, enabling direct deposition onto epithelial cell layers. Cytocompatibility, epithelial barrier integrity, and transepithelial drug transport were assessed alongside quantitative mass balance. Both formulations exhibited comparable solid-state properties, high emitted-dose reproducibility, and similar regional nasal deposition profiles. Neither formulation induced cytotoxicity nor disrupted epithelial barrier integrity, as evidenced by unchanged transepithelial electrical resistance and paracellular permeability. Despite similar deposition behaviour, the surfactant-containing formulation demonstrated faster initial transport and consistently higher transepithelial transport trends, without evidence of barrier compromise. These differences are consistent with formulation-dependent processes following deposition, such as differences in surface wetting and dissolution behaviour at the air-liquid interface. Overall, this study demonstrates that aerosol deposition alone may not fully predict epithelial transport for intranasal dry powders. The integrated deposition-transport platform provides a robust in vitro tool for formulation screening and optimisation, supporting the development of intranasal antiemetic therapies and other nasal drug products requiring rapid and reliable systemic delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14187,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutics","volume":" ","pages":"127596"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2026.127596","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intranasal dry powder delivery offers a non-invasive route for rapid systemic drug absorption and may be particularly beneficial for antiemetic therapy when oral administration is compromised. However, conventional in vitro tools typically assess aerosol deposition or epithelial permeability in isolation, limiting their ability to discriminate formulation-dependent transport behaviour. Two spray-dried formulations, differing only in the presence or absence of a non-ionic surfactant, were characterised for physicochemical properties and aerosol performance, followed by biological evaluation using an air liquid interface (ALI) RPMI-2650 nasal epithelial model. Aerosol delivery was performed using a nasal powder device coupled to a modified expansion chamber and cascade impactor, enabling direct deposition onto epithelial cell layers. Cytocompatibility, epithelial barrier integrity, and transepithelial drug transport were assessed alongside quantitative mass balance. Both formulations exhibited comparable solid-state properties, high emitted-dose reproducibility, and similar regional nasal deposition profiles. Neither formulation induced cytotoxicity nor disrupted epithelial barrier integrity, as evidenced by unchanged transepithelial electrical resistance and paracellular permeability. Despite similar deposition behaviour, the surfactant-containing formulation demonstrated faster initial transport and consistently higher transepithelial transport trends, without evidence of barrier compromise. These differences are consistent with formulation-dependent processes following deposition, such as differences in surface wetting and dissolution behaviour at the air-liquid interface. Overall, this study demonstrates that aerosol deposition alone may not fully predict epithelial transport for intranasal dry powders. The integrated deposition-transport platform provides a robust in vitro tool for formulation screening and optimisation, supporting the development of intranasal antiemetic therapies and other nasal drug products requiring rapid and reliable systemic delivery.

鼻内止吐干粉的综合气溶胶沉积和上皮运输。
鼻内干粉给药为快速全身药物吸收提供了一种非侵入性途径,当口服给药受到损害时,可能对止吐治疗特别有益。然而,传统的体外工具通常单独评估气溶胶沉积或上皮通透性,限制了它们区分配方依赖的运输行为的能力。两种喷雾干燥制剂仅在存在或不存在非离子表面活性剂方面有所不同,对其物理化学特性和气溶胶性能进行了表征,随后使用气液界面(ALI) rmi -2650鼻上皮模型进行了生物评价。气溶胶输送使用鼻粉装置连接到改进的膨胀室和级联冲击器,可以直接沉积在上皮细胞层上。细胞相容性、上皮屏障完整性和经上皮药物转运与定量质量平衡一起评估。两种制剂均表现出可比较的固态特性、高释放剂量重复性和相似的区域鼻沉积特征。这两种制剂都不会引起细胞毒性,也不会破坏上皮屏障的完整性,经上皮电阻和细胞旁通透性不变就是证据。尽管有类似的沉积行为,但含表面活性剂的配方显示出更快的初始运输和持续更高的上皮运输趋势,没有证据表明屏障受损。这些差异与沉积后的配方相关过程一致,例如表面润湿和气液界面溶解行为的差异。总的来说,这项研究表明,仅靠气溶胶沉积可能不能完全预测鼻内干粉的上皮运输。集成的沉积-运输平台为配方筛选和优化提供了强大的体外工具,支持鼻内止吐疗法和其他需要快速可靠全身给药的鼻用药物的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.60%
发文量
951
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmaceutics is the third most cited journal in the "Pharmacy & Pharmacology" category out of 366 journals, being the true home for pharmaceutical scientists concerned with the physical, chemical and biological properties of devices and delivery systems for drugs, vaccines and biologicals, including their design, manufacture and evaluation. This includes evaluation of the properties of drugs, excipients such as surfactants and polymers and novel materials. The journal has special sections on pharmaceutical nanotechnology and personalized medicines, and publishes research papers, reviews, commentaries and letters to the editor as well as special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书