Dose-Response Associations of Exercise Modalities With Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
Wei Zhang, Minghui Du, Yixing Zhan, Zhiyuan Zhang, Longwei Chen, Jie Dong
{"title":"Dose-Response Associations of Exercise Modalities With Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Wei Zhang, Minghui Du, Yixing Zhan, Zhiyuan Zhang, Longwei Chen, Jie Dong","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwag560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Exercise training improves cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with heart failure, yet the dose-response relationship across different exercise modalities remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different exercise modalities and their standardized doses on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) in patients with heart failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched multiple databases from inception through March 2026 for randomized controlled trials comparing exercise interventions with controls. Exercise modalities were categorized as interval aerobic training (IAT), continuous aerobic training (CAT), resistance training (RT), mind-body training (MBT), and their combinations. Exercise dose was uniformly quantified as weekly metabolic equivalents (MET-min/week). A Bayesian model-based network dose-response meta-analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 trials involving 5,353 patients were included. The dose-response relationship followed an Emax curve, with ED50 values clustering around 80-90 MET-min/week. A weekly dose of 500 MET-min yielded considerable benefit, and 750-1000 MET-min approached maximal benefit for nearly all modalities. The top three ranked interventions were IAT (Emax = 3.50, 95% CrI: 2.49-4.60), RT (Emax = 3.66, 95% CrI: 1.96-5.85), and IAT+RT (Emax = 3.49, 95% CrI: 1.26-5.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The exercise dose-response relationship in heart failure follows an Emax curve, with distinct dose-benefit profiles across different exercise modalities. Based on the current evidence, the following preliminary considerations may be offered: for patients with limited exercise tolerance, MBT may be considered as one of the preferred options; for those with moderate exercise tolerance, IAT+RT or CAT+RT may be suitable choices; for patients with good exercise tolerance, IAT or RT may be considered; and for patients with comorbid obesity, CAT may be incorporated into a comprehensive management program.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwag560","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Exercise training improves cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with heart failure, yet the dose-response relationship across different exercise modalities remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different exercise modalities and their standardized doses on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) in patients with heart failure.
Methods: We systematically searched multiple databases from inception through March 2026 for randomized controlled trials comparing exercise interventions with controls. Exercise modalities were categorized as interval aerobic training (IAT), continuous aerobic training (CAT), resistance training (RT), mind-body training (MBT), and their combinations. Exercise dose was uniformly quantified as weekly metabolic equivalents (MET-min/week). A Bayesian model-based network dose-response meta-analysis was performed.
Results: A total of 100 trials involving 5,353 patients were included. The dose-response relationship followed an Emax curve, with ED50 values clustering around 80-90 MET-min/week. A weekly dose of 500 MET-min yielded considerable benefit, and 750-1000 MET-min approached maximal benefit for nearly all modalities. The top three ranked interventions were IAT (Emax = 3.50, 95% CrI: 2.49-4.60), RT (Emax = 3.66, 95% CrI: 1.96-5.85), and IAT+RT (Emax = 3.49, 95% CrI: 1.26-5.79).
Conclusions: The exercise dose-response relationship in heart failure follows an Emax curve, with distinct dose-benefit profiles across different exercise modalities. Based on the current evidence, the following preliminary considerations may be offered: for patients with limited exercise tolerance, MBT may be considered as one of the preferred options; for those with moderate exercise tolerance, IAT+RT or CAT+RT may be suitable choices; for patients with good exercise tolerance, IAT or RT may be considered; and for patients with comorbid obesity, CAT may be incorporated into a comprehensive management program.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.