Dose-Response Associations of Exercise Modalities With Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 10 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Wei Zhang, Minghui Du, Yixing Zhan, Zhiyuan Zhang, Longwei Chen, Jie Dong
{"title":"Dose-Response Associations of Exercise Modalities With Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Wei Zhang, Minghui Du, Yixing Zhan, Zhiyuan Zhang, Longwei Chen, Jie Dong","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwag560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Exercise training improves cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with heart failure, yet the dose-response relationship across different exercise modalities remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different exercise modalities and their standardized doses on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) in patients with heart failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched multiple databases from inception through March 2026 for randomized controlled trials comparing exercise interventions with controls. Exercise modalities were categorized as interval aerobic training (IAT), continuous aerobic training (CAT), resistance training (RT), mind-body training (MBT), and their combinations. Exercise dose was uniformly quantified as weekly metabolic equivalents (MET-min/week). A Bayesian model-based network dose-response meta-analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 trials involving 5,353 patients were included. The dose-response relationship followed an Emax curve, with ED50 values clustering around 80-90 MET-min/week. A weekly dose of 500 MET-min yielded considerable benefit, and 750-1000 MET-min approached maximal benefit for nearly all modalities. The top three ranked interventions were IAT (Emax = 3.50, 95% CrI: 2.49-4.60), RT (Emax = 3.66, 95% CrI: 1.96-5.85), and IAT+RT (Emax = 3.49, 95% CrI: 1.26-5.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The exercise dose-response relationship in heart failure follows an Emax curve, with distinct dose-benefit profiles across different exercise modalities. Based on the current evidence, the following preliminary considerations may be offered: for patients with limited exercise tolerance, MBT may be considered as one of the preferred options; for those with moderate exercise tolerance, IAT+RT or CAT+RT may be suitable choices; for patients with good exercise tolerance, IAT or RT may be considered; and for patients with comorbid obesity, CAT may be incorporated into a comprehensive management program.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwag560","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Exercise training improves cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with heart failure, yet the dose-response relationship across different exercise modalities remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different exercise modalities and their standardized doses on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) in patients with heart failure.

Methods: We systematically searched multiple databases from inception through March 2026 for randomized controlled trials comparing exercise interventions with controls. Exercise modalities were categorized as interval aerobic training (IAT), continuous aerobic training (CAT), resistance training (RT), mind-body training (MBT), and their combinations. Exercise dose was uniformly quantified as weekly metabolic equivalents (MET-min/week). A Bayesian model-based network dose-response meta-analysis was performed.

Results: A total of 100 trials involving 5,353 patients were included. The dose-response relationship followed an Emax curve, with ED50 values clustering around 80-90 MET-min/week. A weekly dose of 500 MET-min yielded considerable benefit, and 750-1000 MET-min approached maximal benefit for nearly all modalities. The top three ranked interventions were IAT (Emax = 3.50, 95% CrI: 2.49-4.60), RT (Emax = 3.66, 95% CrI: 1.96-5.85), and IAT+RT (Emax = 3.49, 95% CrI: 1.26-5.79).

Conclusions: The exercise dose-response relationship in heart failure follows an Emax curve, with distinct dose-benefit profiles across different exercise modalities. Based on the current evidence, the following preliminary considerations may be offered: for patients with limited exercise tolerance, MBT may be considered as one of the preferred options; for those with moderate exercise tolerance, IAT+RT or CAT+RT may be suitable choices; for patients with good exercise tolerance, IAT or RT may be considered; and for patients with comorbid obesity, CAT may be incorporated into a comprehensive management program.

心力衰竭患者运动方式与心肺健康的剂量-反应关联:系统综述和贝叶斯网络meta分析。
目的:运动训练可以改善心力衰竭患者的心肺功能,但不同运动方式之间的剂量-反应关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估不同运动方式及其标准剂量对心力衰竭患者峰值摄氧量(VO2peak)的影响。方法:我们系统地检索了多个数据库,从建立到2026年3月,以比较运动干预与对照组的随机对照试验。运动方式分为间歇有氧训练(IAT)、持续有氧训练(CAT)、阻力训练(RT)、心身训练(MBT)及其组合。运动剂量统一量化为周代谢当量(MET-min/week)。进行了基于贝叶斯模型的网络剂量-反应荟萃分析。结果:共纳入100项试验,涉及5353例患者。剂量-反应关系符合Emax曲线,ED50值聚集在80-90 MET-min/week附近。每周500 MET-min的剂量产生了相当大的益处,750-1000 MET-min接近几乎所有模式的最大益处。排名前三位的干预措施分别是IAT (Emax = 3.50, 95% CrI: 2.49 ~ 4.60)、RT (Emax = 3.66, 95% CrI: 1.96 ~ 5.85)和IAT+RT (Emax = 3.49, 95% CrI: 1.26 ~ 5.79)。结论:心力衰竭的运动剂量-反应关系遵循Emax曲线,在不同的运动方式中具有不同的剂量-效益曲线。根据目前的证据,可以提出以下初步考虑:对于运动耐受性有限的患者,MBT可能被认为是首选方案之一;对于运动耐受性中等的人,IAT+RT或CAT+RT可能是合适的选择;对于运动耐受性好的患者,可以考虑IAT或RT;对于合并肥胖的患者,CAT可纳入综合管理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书