Acetaminophen absorption for gastric emptying revisited.

Q3 Medicine
Masaki Sanaka, Takatsugu Yamamoto
{"title":"Acetaminophen absorption for gastric emptying revisited.","authors":"Masaki Sanaka, Takatsugu Yamamoto","doi":"10.1540/jsmr.62.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The acetaminophen (paracetamol) absorption technique was a popular method for evaluating gastric emptying. However, it has been losing its popularity lately, as convenient <sup>13</sup>C breath testing has rapidly become the prevailing method. There are three likely reasons for its declining popularity: 1) the acetaminophen test is indicated only for liquid emptying studies; 2) the optimal parameter for application as an emptying index remains undetermined; 3) it seems invasive and time-consuming because of the need for repeated blood sampling over several hours. We have critically reviewed the three objections in defense of the acetaminophen absorption test. Our replies to each objection are as follows: 1) liquid gastric emptying studies still have additional value to solid studies; 2) pharmacokinetic theories ensure that the peak concentration, time to peak, and area under the time-concentration curve reflect the rate of acetaminophen absorption, namely gastric emptying, with the time to peak possibly being the most accurate measure; 3) the acetaminophen absorption technique can be noninvasively performed using saliva samples. Moreover, the use of a fixed-time concentration, which is correlated with scintigraphy, could make the acetaminophen test time-saving and minimally invasive. We have claimed that acetaminophen absorption is still useful and has the potential to be a convenient gastric emptying test at community clinics and hospitals where a <sup>13</sup>C breath analyzer is unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":39619,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smooth Muscle Research","volume":"62 ","pages":"55-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smooth Muscle Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1540/jsmr.62.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The acetaminophen (paracetamol) absorption technique was a popular method for evaluating gastric emptying. However, it has been losing its popularity lately, as convenient 13C breath testing has rapidly become the prevailing method. There are three likely reasons for its declining popularity: 1) the acetaminophen test is indicated only for liquid emptying studies; 2) the optimal parameter for application as an emptying index remains undetermined; 3) it seems invasive and time-consuming because of the need for repeated blood sampling over several hours. We have critically reviewed the three objections in defense of the acetaminophen absorption test. Our replies to each objection are as follows: 1) liquid gastric emptying studies still have additional value to solid studies; 2) pharmacokinetic theories ensure that the peak concentration, time to peak, and area under the time-concentration curve reflect the rate of acetaminophen absorption, namely gastric emptying, with the time to peak possibly being the most accurate measure; 3) the acetaminophen absorption technique can be noninvasively performed using saliva samples. Moreover, the use of a fixed-time concentration, which is correlated with scintigraphy, could make the acetaminophen test time-saving and minimally invasive. We have claimed that acetaminophen absorption is still useful and has the potential to be a convenient gastric emptying test at community clinics and hospitals where a 13C breath analyzer is unavailable.

胃排空对乙酰氨基酚的吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Smooth Muscle Research
Journal of Smooth Muscle Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Physiology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书