Maxim Neumann, Anton Raichuk, Peter Potapov, Myroslava Lesiv, Matthew Overlan, Mélanie Rey, Ravindran Rajakumar, Michelangelo Conserva, Radost Stanimirova, Michelle J Sims, Sarah Carter, Elizabeth Goldman, Yuchang Jiang, Linus Scheibenreif, Ivelina Georgieva, Maria Shchepashchenko, Steffen Fritz, Nicholas Clinton, Charlotte Stanton, Dan Morris, Drew Purves
{"title":"Global forest typology at 10-meter resolution for forest and land-use monitoring.","authors":"Maxim Neumann, Anton Raichuk, Peter Potapov, Myroslava Lesiv, Matthew Overlan, Mélanie Rey, Ravindran Rajakumar, Michelangelo Conserva, Radost Stanimirova, Michelle J Sims, Sarah Carter, Elizabeth Goldman, Yuchang Jiang, Linus Scheibenreif, Ivelina Georgieva, Maria Shchepashchenko, Steffen Fritz, Nicholas Clinton, Charlotte Stanton, Dan Morris, Drew Purves","doi":"10.1038/s41597-026-08299-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distinguishing forest types-primary, naturally regenerating, planted, and plantation forests-from agricultural tree crops and other land uses is essential for carbon accounting, biodiversity assessment, conservation planning, and supply-chain regulation. However, no existing global dataset resolves this typology at high spatial resolution. We present the Forest Typology (ForTy) v1 dataset, a global 10-meter resolution baseline map for 2020 that classifies all land into six categories aligned with FAO and EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) definitions: Primary Forest, Naturally Regenerating Forest, Planted Forest, Plantation Forest, Tree Crops and Agroforestry, and Other Land. A cascaded deep learning pipeline, trained on 1.7 million globally distributed samples, generates per-class relative confidence maps from geospatial satellite embeddings by combining weakly supervised learning with active learning. Independent validation against 8,190 expert-labeled stratified random sites yields an overall accuracy of 90.2% for the six-class scheme, 94.8% for natural forest classification, and 95.5% for forest/non-forest classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":21597,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Data","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13686961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Data","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-08299-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Distinguishing forest types-primary, naturally regenerating, planted, and plantation forests-from agricultural tree crops and other land uses is essential for carbon accounting, biodiversity assessment, conservation planning, and supply-chain regulation. However, no existing global dataset resolves this typology at high spatial resolution. We present the Forest Typology (ForTy) v1 dataset, a global 10-meter resolution baseline map for 2020 that classifies all land into six categories aligned with FAO and EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) definitions: Primary Forest, Naturally Regenerating Forest, Planted Forest, Plantation Forest, Tree Crops and Agroforestry, and Other Land. A cascaded deep learning pipeline, trained on 1.7 million globally distributed samples, generates per-class relative confidence maps from geospatial satellite embeddings by combining weakly supervised learning with active learning. Independent validation against 8,190 expert-labeled stratified random sites yields an overall accuracy of 90.2% for the six-class scheme, 94.8% for natural forest classification, and 95.5% for forest/non-forest classification.
期刊介绍:
Scientific Data is an open-access journal focused on data, publishing descriptions of research datasets and articles on data sharing across natural sciences, medicine, engineering, and social sciences. Its goal is to enhance the sharing and reuse of scientific data, encourage broader data sharing, and acknowledge those who share their data.
The journal primarily publishes Data Descriptors, which offer detailed descriptions of research datasets, including data collection methods and technical analyses validating data quality. These descriptors aim to facilitate data reuse rather than testing hypotheses or presenting new interpretations, methods, or in-depth analyses.