Can consumers accurately identify loot boxes and loot box receipts?

IF 3 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Royal Society Open Science Pub Date : 2026-10-21 eCollection Date: 2026-10-07 DOI:10.1098/rsos.261484
Matt B Hall, Lauren C Hall, James D Sauer, Aaron Drummond
{"title":"Can consumers accurately identify loot boxes and loot box receipts?","authors":"Matt B Hall, Lauren C Hall, James D Sauer, Aaron Drummond","doi":"10.1098/rsos.261484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Loot boxes are randomized rewards in video games. Meta-analyses suggest relationships between loot box spending and problem gambling symptomatology, and early longitudinal evidence suggests loot box purchasers migrate into conventional gambling at higher rates than non-purchasers. Regulatory responses vary across jurisdictions, and even in jurisdictions that have banned loot boxes, evidence suggests their presence in games remains common. Consequently, consumers are often responsible for regulating their own, and their children's, loot box purchasing. To effectively achieve this, consumers must first be able to identify loot boxes. Here, we investigated consumer accuracy in identifying critical features of loot boxes. Participants were tasked to identify basic facts about, pictures of, and receipts generated by loot boxes. Parents and non-gamers, compared with non-parents and gamers, respectively, were poorer at identifying loot boxes. Our results suggest that parents and non-gamers may be less equipped to make informed loot box purchasing decisions compared with non-parents/non-guardians and gamers, respectively. This may pose risks for parents and unaware incipient gamers. These are the first findings providing objective evidence about the relative ability of consumers to identify, and thus self-regulate purchases of, loot boxes and suggest that parents and non-gamers may require support to ensure informed purchasing decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21525,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society Open Science","volume":"13 10","pages":"261484"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13682923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.261484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loot boxes are randomized rewards in video games. Meta-analyses suggest relationships between loot box spending and problem gambling symptomatology, and early longitudinal evidence suggests loot box purchasers migrate into conventional gambling at higher rates than non-purchasers. Regulatory responses vary across jurisdictions, and even in jurisdictions that have banned loot boxes, evidence suggests their presence in games remains common. Consequently, consumers are often responsible for regulating their own, and their children's, loot box purchasing. To effectively achieve this, consumers must first be able to identify loot boxes. Here, we investigated consumer accuracy in identifying critical features of loot boxes. Participants were tasked to identify basic facts about, pictures of, and receipts generated by loot boxes. Parents and non-gamers, compared with non-parents and gamers, respectively, were poorer at identifying loot boxes. Our results suggest that parents and non-gamers may be less equipped to make informed loot box purchasing decisions compared with non-parents/non-guardians and gamers, respectively. This may pose risks for parents and unaware incipient gamers. These are the first findings providing objective evidence about the relative ability of consumers to identify, and thus self-regulate purchases of, loot boxes and suggest that parents and non-gamers may require support to ensure informed purchasing decisions.

消费者能否准确识别战利品箱和战利品箱收据?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review. The journal covers the entire range of science and mathematics and will allow the Society to publish all the high-quality work it receives without the usual restrictions on scope, length or impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书