Comparative analysis of subjective and objective visual quality after LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Wei Zhao, Rong Shi, Lijuan Sun, Zehong Dong, Jie Feng, Xueting Chen
{"title":"Comparative analysis of subjective and objective visual quality after LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK.","authors":"Wei Zhao, Rong Shi, Lijuan Sun, Zehong Dong, Jie Feng, Xueting Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10103-026-05043-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to compare subjective and objective visual quality after three types of corneal refractive surgery (LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK). 150 patients (300 eyes) who underwent corneal refractive surgery were divided into three groups comprised of 45 patients (90 eyes) in the LASEK group, 55 patients (110 eyes) in the FS-LASIK group, and 50 patients (100 eyes) in the TransPRK group. Subjective evaluation included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), recorded in decimal notation, and the Quality-of-Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire. Objective optical quality was measured with the OQAS II double-pass analyzer (Visiometrics, Spain) in 50 eyes per group. All three surgical procedures-LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK-significantly improved overall UDVA from baseline. At 6 months postoperatively, UDVA after LASEK and FS-LASIK was significantly higher than at 1 month, and UDVA at 1 month was significantly better than preoperative levels (P < 0.05). At 1 month, UDVA was significantly better after TransPRK than after LASEK or FS-LASIK, but this difference was no longer present at 6 months. At 6 months, QIRC scores were significantly higher than preoperative values after FS-LASIK (P = 0.004) and TransPRK (P = 0.016), whereas the increase after LASEK was not significant (P = 0.157). All procedures were associated with improvements in subjective and objective visual quality measures; however, no statistically significant differences were observed among the three surgical techniques at six months. Objective optical quality indices were within the normal range in all three groups at 6 months and did not differ significantly between techniques. All procedures (LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK) were associated with improvements in subjective and objective visual quality and quality of life; however, no statistically significant differences were observed among the three surgical techniques at six months postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13687349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-026-05043-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare subjective and objective visual quality after three types of corneal refractive surgery (LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK). 150 patients (300 eyes) who underwent corneal refractive surgery were divided into three groups comprised of 45 patients (90 eyes) in the LASEK group, 55 patients (110 eyes) in the FS-LASIK group, and 50 patients (100 eyes) in the TransPRK group. Subjective evaluation included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), recorded in decimal notation, and the Quality-of-Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire. Objective optical quality was measured with the OQAS II double-pass analyzer (Visiometrics, Spain) in 50 eyes per group. All three surgical procedures-LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK-significantly improved overall UDVA from baseline. At 6 months postoperatively, UDVA after LASEK and FS-LASIK was significantly higher than at 1 month, and UDVA at 1 month was significantly better than preoperative levels (P < 0.05). At 1 month, UDVA was significantly better after TransPRK than after LASEK or FS-LASIK, but this difference was no longer present at 6 months. At 6 months, QIRC scores were significantly higher than preoperative values after FS-LASIK (P = 0.004) and TransPRK (P = 0.016), whereas the increase after LASEK was not significant (P = 0.157). All procedures were associated with improvements in subjective and objective visual quality measures; however, no statistically significant differences were observed among the three surgical techniques at six months. Objective optical quality indices were within the normal range in all three groups at 6 months and did not differ significantly between techniques. All procedures (LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK) were associated with improvements in subjective and objective visual quality and quality of life; however, no statistically significant differences were observed among the three surgical techniques at six months postoperatively.

LASEK、FS-LASIK和TransPRK术后主客观视觉质量的比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书