Wei Zhao, Rong Shi, Lijuan Sun, Zehong Dong, Jie Feng, Xueting Chen
{"title":"Comparative analysis of subjective and objective visual quality after LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK.","authors":"Wei Zhao, Rong Shi, Lijuan Sun, Zehong Dong, Jie Feng, Xueting Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10103-026-05043-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to compare subjective and objective visual quality after three types of corneal refractive surgery (LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK). 150 patients (300 eyes) who underwent corneal refractive surgery were divided into three groups comprised of 45 patients (90 eyes) in the LASEK group, 55 patients (110 eyes) in the FS-LASIK group, and 50 patients (100 eyes) in the TransPRK group. Subjective evaluation included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), recorded in decimal notation, and the Quality-of-Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire. Objective optical quality was measured with the OQAS II double-pass analyzer (Visiometrics, Spain) in 50 eyes per group. All three surgical procedures-LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK-significantly improved overall UDVA from baseline. At 6 months postoperatively, UDVA after LASEK and FS-LASIK was significantly higher than at 1 month, and UDVA at 1 month was significantly better than preoperative levels (P < 0.05). At 1 month, UDVA was significantly better after TransPRK than after LASEK or FS-LASIK, but this difference was no longer present at 6 months. At 6 months, QIRC scores were significantly higher than preoperative values after FS-LASIK (P = 0.004) and TransPRK (P = 0.016), whereas the increase after LASEK was not significant (P = 0.157). All procedures were associated with improvements in subjective and objective visual quality measures; however, no statistically significant differences were observed among the three surgical techniques at six months. Objective optical quality indices were within the normal range in all three groups at 6 months and did not differ significantly between techniques. All procedures (LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK) were associated with improvements in subjective and objective visual quality and quality of life; however, no statistically significant differences were observed among the three surgical techniques at six months postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13687349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-026-05043-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare subjective and objective visual quality after three types of corneal refractive surgery (LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK). 150 patients (300 eyes) who underwent corneal refractive surgery were divided into three groups comprised of 45 patients (90 eyes) in the LASEK group, 55 patients (110 eyes) in the FS-LASIK group, and 50 patients (100 eyes) in the TransPRK group. Subjective evaluation included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), recorded in decimal notation, and the Quality-of-Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire. Objective optical quality was measured with the OQAS II double-pass analyzer (Visiometrics, Spain) in 50 eyes per group. All three surgical procedures-LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK-significantly improved overall UDVA from baseline. At 6 months postoperatively, UDVA after LASEK and FS-LASIK was significantly higher than at 1 month, and UDVA at 1 month was significantly better than preoperative levels (P < 0.05). At 1 month, UDVA was significantly better after TransPRK than after LASEK or FS-LASIK, but this difference was no longer present at 6 months. At 6 months, QIRC scores were significantly higher than preoperative values after FS-LASIK (P = 0.004) and TransPRK (P = 0.016), whereas the increase after LASEK was not significant (P = 0.157). All procedures were associated with improvements in subjective and objective visual quality measures; however, no statistically significant differences were observed among the three surgical techniques at six months. Objective optical quality indices were within the normal range in all three groups at 6 months and did not differ significantly between techniques. All procedures (LASEK, FS-LASIK, and TransPRK) were associated with improvements in subjective and objective visual quality and quality of life; however, no statistically significant differences were observed among the three surgical techniques at six months postoperatively.
期刊介绍:
Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics.
The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.