Thermographic outcomes of auricular laser acupuncture and auricular seed acupressure in older adults with chronic shoulder pain: an exploratory nonrandomized, nonconcurrent comparison.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Gerson Quadros, Emilia Angela Lo Schiavo Arisawa, Luís Eduardo Soares
{"title":"Thermographic outcomes of auricular laser acupuncture and auricular seed acupressure in older adults with chronic shoulder pain: an exploratory nonrandomized, nonconcurrent comparison.","authors":"Gerson Quadros, Emilia Angela Lo Schiavo Arisawa, Luís Eduardo Soares","doi":"10.1007/s10103-026-05078-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Compare pain, quality of life, and cutaneous temperature changes within predefined anterior, lateral, and posterior shoulder regions of interest between auricular laser acupuncture and seed acupressure in older adults with chronic shoulder pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory, nonrandomized, open-label study enrolled 20 adults aged 60-90 years, allocated by order of entry to consecutive, nonconcurrent cohorts of auricular laser acupuncture (n = 10) or seed acupressure (n = 10), treated twice weekly for five weeks. VAS, McGill, SF-36, and thermography were assessed before the first (A1) and fifth sessions (A2) and after the tenth (A3) and analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From A1 to A3, VAS decreased by - 2.70 points in Laser (95% CI - 4.37 to - 1.03) and - 2.50 in Seed (95% CI - 4.17 to - 0.83); the between-group difference was - 0.20 points (Laser - Seed; 95% CI - 2.54 to 2.14). Selected McGill and SF-36 outcomes changed; McGill affective A1-to-A2 change differed between groups (Laser - Seed: -2.70; 95% CI - 4.86 to - 0.55; p = 0.017). Anterior thermal range (ΔT) showed a TIME × GROUP interaction (p = 0.007); the A1-to-A3 between-group difference was - 1.941 °C (Seed - Laser; 95% CI - 3.097 to - 0.785), although Seed ΔT was higher at baseline (+ 1.496 °C; 95% CI 0.607 to 2.385). Lateral ΔT showed a TIME effect (p = 0.033); posterior ΔT showed none.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical outcomes improved over time without evidence of differential changes between interventions. Thermography identified region-specific ΔT trajectories, warranting further investigation as a complementary method.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07010627.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13687162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-026-05078-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Compare pain, quality of life, and cutaneous temperature changes within predefined anterior, lateral, and posterior shoulder regions of interest between auricular laser acupuncture and seed acupressure in older adults with chronic shoulder pain.

Methods: This exploratory, nonrandomized, open-label study enrolled 20 adults aged 60-90 years, allocated by order of entry to consecutive, nonconcurrent cohorts of auricular laser acupuncture (n = 10) or seed acupressure (n = 10), treated twice weekly for five weeks. VAS, McGill, SF-36, and thermography were assessed before the first (A1) and fifth sessions (A2) and after the tenth (A3) and analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.

Results: From A1 to A3, VAS decreased by - 2.70 points in Laser (95% CI - 4.37 to - 1.03) and - 2.50 in Seed (95% CI - 4.17 to - 0.83); the between-group difference was - 0.20 points (Laser - Seed; 95% CI - 2.54 to 2.14). Selected McGill and SF-36 outcomes changed; McGill affective A1-to-A2 change differed between groups (Laser - Seed: -2.70; 95% CI - 4.86 to - 0.55; p = 0.017). Anterior thermal range (ΔT) showed a TIME × GROUP interaction (p = 0.007); the A1-to-A3 between-group difference was - 1.941 °C (Seed - Laser; 95% CI - 3.097 to - 0.785), although Seed ΔT was higher at baseline (+ 1.496 °C; 95% CI 0.607 to 2.385). Lateral ΔT showed a TIME effect (p = 0.033); posterior ΔT showed none.

Conclusion: Clinical outcomes improved over time without evidence of differential changes between interventions. Thermography identified region-specific ΔT trajectories, warranting further investigation as a complementary method.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07010627.

耳穴激光针刺和耳穴种压治疗老年人慢性肩痛的热成像结果:一项探索性非随机、非并发比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书