Fertility preservation counselling in women with cancer: knowledge, preferences, and unmet needs from a cross-sectional survey.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Frontiers in Endocrinology Pub Date : 2026-10-06 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fendo.2026.1926475
Giacomo Corrado, Drieda Zace, Inge Peters, Paola Villa, Luigi Petrella, Alessia Barreca, Lucrezia Massaro, Letizia Lafuenti, Erica Silvestris, Stefano Canosa, Cristina Fabiani, Daniela Rosaria Pia Chieffo, Anna Fagotti, Maria Luisa Di Pietro
{"title":"Fertility preservation counselling in women with cancer: knowledge, preferences, and unmet needs from a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Giacomo Corrado, Drieda Zace, Inge Peters, Paola Villa, Luigi Petrella, Alessia Barreca, Lucrezia Massaro, Letizia Lafuenti, Erica Silvestris, Stefano Canosa, Cristina Fabiani, Daniela Rosaria Pia Chieffo, Anna Fagotti, Maria Luisa Di Pietro","doi":"10.3389/fendo.2026.1926475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fertility preservation (FP) is a critical survivorship issue for young women with cancer, yet gaps persist between guidelines and clinical practice. This study assesses knowledge, attitudes, and unmet needs among women referred for specialist counseling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cross-sectional survey was conducted (November 2022 - June 2026) among women referred to a single tertiary oncofertility center in Rome. A Delphi-informed online questionnaire was completed before the clinical visit. Descriptive statistics and exploratory multivariable logistic regression examined post-diagnosis intention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 284 women invited to participate, 260 completed the survey (response rate, 91.5%); 240 patients with a confirmed cancer diagnosis were included in the final analysis (median age, 32 years). Overall, 69.6% were interested in FP, and 94.2% recognized that gonadotoxic treatments could impair fertility. While 89.6% had heard of FP, only half received this information from healthcare professionals, and 24.2% knew of no specific options. Over half reported concerns regarding treatment delay, safety, effectiveness, and cost. Before diagnosis, 73.7% planned to have children; post-diagnosis, positive intention remained common, while those previously without intentions shifted toward uncertainty. In the 188-case model, pre-diagnosis intention showed the strongest association (OR 11.64, 95% CI 4.45-30.48). Given limited model performance (pseudo-R²=0.19), estimates warrant caution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-center referred cohort, informational gaps and uncertainty remained despite high awareness. Findings confirm and contextualize prior evidence in an Italian tertiary setting and may inform similar referral pathways, but require validation in broader populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12447,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1926475"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13684863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1926475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fertility preservation (FP) is a critical survivorship issue for young women with cancer, yet gaps persist between guidelines and clinical practice. This study assesses knowledge, attitudes, and unmet needs among women referred for specialist counseling.

Methods: An observational cross-sectional survey was conducted (November 2022 - June 2026) among women referred to a single tertiary oncofertility center in Rome. A Delphi-informed online questionnaire was completed before the clinical visit. Descriptive statistics and exploratory multivariable logistic regression examined post-diagnosis intention.

Results: Among 284 women invited to participate, 260 completed the survey (response rate, 91.5%); 240 patients with a confirmed cancer diagnosis were included in the final analysis (median age, 32 years). Overall, 69.6% were interested in FP, and 94.2% recognized that gonadotoxic treatments could impair fertility. While 89.6% had heard of FP, only half received this information from healthcare professionals, and 24.2% knew of no specific options. Over half reported concerns regarding treatment delay, safety, effectiveness, and cost. Before diagnosis, 73.7% planned to have children; post-diagnosis, positive intention remained common, while those previously without intentions shifted toward uncertainty. In the 188-case model, pre-diagnosis intention showed the strongest association (OR 11.64, 95% CI 4.45-30.48). Given limited model performance (pseudo-R²=0.19), estimates warrant caution.

Conclusions: In this single-center referred cohort, informational gaps and uncertainty remained despite high awareness. Findings confirm and contextualize prior evidence in an Italian tertiary setting and may inform similar referral pathways, but require validation in broader populations.

癌症妇女的生育保留咨询:知识、偏好和未满足的需求来自横断面调查。
背景:生育能力保存(FP)是年轻女性癌症患者生存的关键问题,但指南和临床实践之间存在差距。本研究评估知识,态度,和未满足的需求,妇女转介专家咨询。方法:观察性横断面调查(2022年11月- 2026年6月)在罗马的一个三级肿瘤中心进行。在临床访问前完成一份德尔福知情在线问卷。描述性统计和探索性多变量逻辑回归检验了诊断后意向。结果:被邀请参与的284名女性中,完成问卷调查的260人(回复率91.5%);最终分析纳入240例确诊癌症患者(中位年龄32岁)。总体而言,69.6%的人对计划生育感兴趣,94.2%的人认为促性腺毒素治疗会损害生育能力。虽然89.6%的人听说过计划生育,但只有一半的人从医疗保健专业人员那里得到了这方面的信息,24.2%的人不知道具体的选择。超过一半的人报告了对治疗延误、安全性、有效性和费用的担忧。确诊前有生育计划的占73.7%;诊断后,积极的意图仍然普遍存在,而那些以前没有意图的人转向不确定。在188例模型中,诊断前意向显示出最强的相关性(OR 11.64, 95% CI 4.45-30.48)。鉴于有限的模型性能(伪r²=0.19),估计需要谨慎。结论:在这个单中心参考队列中,尽管有很高的认识,但信息差距和不确定性仍然存在。研究结果证实了意大利高等教育机构的先前证据,并将其背景化,可能为类似的转诊途径提供信息,但需要在更广泛的人群中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Frontiers in Endocrinology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
3023
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Endocrinology is a field journal of the "Frontiers in" journal series. In today’s world, endocrinology is becoming increasingly important as it underlies many of the challenges societies face - from obesity and diabetes to reproduction, population control and aging. Endocrinology covers a broad field from basic molecular and cellular communication through to clinical care and some of the most crucial public health issues. The journal, thus, welcomes outstanding contributions in any domain of endocrinology. Frontiers in Endocrinology publishes articles on the most outstanding discoveries across a wide research spectrum of Endocrinology. The mission of Frontiers in Endocrinology is to bring all relevant Endocrinology areas together on a single platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书