Total gonadotropin dose is not associated with live birth or embryo quality in fresh cycles at equivalent levels of ovarian response: a retrospective cohort study stratified by ovarian response.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Frontiers in Endocrinology Pub Date : 2026-10-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fendo.2026.1970297
Keng Feng, Liyan Wang, Haiwen Wei, Feifei Lei, Derong Li, Yudi Luo, Xiang Li, Lingling Zhu, Jiyi Wang
{"title":"Total gonadotropin dose is not associated with live birth or embryo quality in fresh cycles at equivalent levels of ovarian response: a retrospective cohort study stratified by ovarian response.","authors":"Keng Feng, Liyan Wang, Haiwen Wei, Feifei Lei, Derong Li, Yudi Luo, Xiang Li, Lingling Zhu, Jiyi Wang","doi":"10.3389/fendo.2026.1970297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Whether the total gonadotropin (Gn) dose used for controlled ovarian stimulation is independently associated with live birth and embryo quality remains controversial, largely because the dose is individualized according to patient prognosis, which generates confounding by indication. We examined this association within homogeneous levels of ovarian response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed 3,711 fresh autologous embryo transfer cycles (female age ≤35 years, follicular-phase long protocol, January 2016 to June 2025); cycles with trigger-day progesterone ≥1.5 ng/mL were excluded because fresh transfer was canceled per center policy. Cycles were stratified by oocyte yield into poor (<10, n=1,346), normal (10-15, n=1,582), and high (>15, n=783) response. The exposure was the total Gn dose. The primary outcome was the fresh embryo transfer live birth rate; secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy, early miscarriage, and morphological embryo-quality indicators. We modeled dose-response relationships with restricted cubic splines (RCS), compared dose quartiles within strata using sequentially adjusted logistic regression, controlled the false discovery rate (FDR) by the Benjamini-Hochberg method, and prespecified five sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the overall cohort, the total Gn dose showed neither a linear (P=0.871) nor a nonlinear (P=0.701) association with live birth. Compared with the lowest dose quartile (Q1), fully adjusted odds ratios for Q2, Q3, and Q4 were 1.18 (95% CI: 0.90-1.55), 1.08 (0.78-1.49), and 1.34 (0.92-1.95), and no stratum showed a significant association. In the normal-response stratum, the highest quartile was associated with reduced live birth in the crude model (OR=0.70, P=0.036), but the association attenuated and disappeared with sequential adjustment (aOR=1.08, P=0.757), which quantitatively illustrates how confounding by indication arises and how it can be corrected. No secondary outcome remained significant after FDR correction (minimum q=0.137), and all sensitivity analyses agreed with the main analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the same level of ovarian response, the total Gn dose was not significantly associated with fresh embryo transfer live birth or morphological embryo quality. Within the dose range studied (700-8,025 IU; interquartile range 1,650-2,725 IU), escalating the Gn dose to improve embryo quality or live birth lacks evidential support, and moderate dose increases in patients with reduced ovarian sensitivity showed no signal of harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":12447,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1970297"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13683207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1970297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Whether the total gonadotropin (Gn) dose used for controlled ovarian stimulation is independently associated with live birth and embryo quality remains controversial, largely because the dose is individualized according to patient prognosis, which generates confounding by indication. We examined this association within homogeneous levels of ovarian response.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed 3,711 fresh autologous embryo transfer cycles (female age ≤35 years, follicular-phase long protocol, January 2016 to June 2025); cycles with trigger-day progesterone ≥1.5 ng/mL were excluded because fresh transfer was canceled per center policy. Cycles were stratified by oocyte yield into poor (<10, n=1,346), normal (10-15, n=1,582), and high (>15, n=783) response. The exposure was the total Gn dose. The primary outcome was the fresh embryo transfer live birth rate; secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy, early miscarriage, and morphological embryo-quality indicators. We modeled dose-response relationships with restricted cubic splines (RCS), compared dose quartiles within strata using sequentially adjusted logistic regression, controlled the false discovery rate (FDR) by the Benjamini-Hochberg method, and prespecified five sensitivity analyses.

Results: In the overall cohort, the total Gn dose showed neither a linear (P=0.871) nor a nonlinear (P=0.701) association with live birth. Compared with the lowest dose quartile (Q1), fully adjusted odds ratios for Q2, Q3, and Q4 were 1.18 (95% CI: 0.90-1.55), 1.08 (0.78-1.49), and 1.34 (0.92-1.95), and no stratum showed a significant association. In the normal-response stratum, the highest quartile was associated with reduced live birth in the crude model (OR=0.70, P=0.036), but the association attenuated and disappeared with sequential adjustment (aOR=1.08, P=0.757), which quantitatively illustrates how confounding by indication arises and how it can be corrected. No secondary outcome remained significant after FDR correction (minimum q=0.137), and all sensitivity analyses agreed with the main analysis.

Conclusions: Within the same level of ovarian response, the total Gn dose was not significantly associated with fresh embryo transfer live birth or morphological embryo quality. Within the dose range studied (700-8,025 IU; interquartile range 1,650-2,725 IU), escalating the Gn dose to improve embryo quality or live birth lacks evidential support, and moderate dose increases in patients with reduced ovarian sensitivity showed no signal of harm.

在相同卵巢反应水平的新鲜周期中,总促性腺激素剂量与活产或胚胎质量无关:一项按卵巢反应分层的回顾性队列研究。
导论:用于控制卵巢刺激的促性腺激素(Gn)总剂量是否与活产和胚胎质量独立相关仍存在争议,主要是因为剂量是根据患者预后进行个体化的,这就产生了指征上的混淆。我们在卵巢反应的同质水平中检查了这种关联。方法:本单中心回顾性队列研究分析了3711例新鲜自体胚胎移植周期(女性年龄≤35岁,卵泡期长方案,2016年1月至2025年6月);触发日孕酮≥1.5 ng/mL的周期被排除,因为根据中心政策取消了新鲜转移。根据卵母细胞产量将周期划分为不良反应(15,n=783)。暴露量是总剂量。主要结果是新鲜胚胎移植的活产率;次要结局包括临床妊娠、早期流产和胚胎形态质量指标。我们使用限制性三次样条(RCS)建模剂量-反应关系,使用顺序调整逻辑回归比较地层内的剂量四分位数,使用Benjamini-Hochberg方法控制错误发现率(FDR),并预先指定了五种敏感性分析。结果:在整个队列中,Gn总剂量与活产既没有线性(P=0.871)关系,也没有非线性(P=0.701)关系。与最低剂量四分位数(Q1)相比,Q2、Q3和Q4的完全校正优势比分别为1.18 (95% CI: 0.90-1.55)、1.08(0.78-1.49)和1.34(0.92-1.95),各阶层均无显著相关性。在正常反应层中,在原始模型中,最高四分位数与活产减少相关(OR=0.70, P=0.036),但随着顺序调整,这种关联减弱并消失(aOR=1.08, P=0.757),这从数量上说明了指状混淆是如何产生的,以及如何纠正。FDR校正后,次要结局无显著性(最小q=0.137),所有敏感性分析与主分析一致。结论:在相同卵巢反应水平下,Gn总剂量与新鲜胚胎移植、活产或形态胚胎质量无显著相关。在研究的剂量范围内(700- 8025 IU;四分位数范围为1650 - 2725 IU),通过增加Gn剂量来改善胚胎质量或活产缺乏证据支持,在卵巢敏感性降低的患者中适度增加剂量没有显示出危害的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Frontiers in Endocrinology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
3023
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Endocrinology is a field journal of the "Frontiers in" journal series. In today’s world, endocrinology is becoming increasingly important as it underlies many of the challenges societies face - from obesity and diabetes to reproduction, population control and aging. Endocrinology covers a broad field from basic molecular and cellular communication through to clinical care and some of the most crucial public health issues. The journal, thus, welcomes outstanding contributions in any domain of endocrinology. Frontiers in Endocrinology publishes articles on the most outstanding discoveries across a wide research spectrum of Endocrinology. The mission of Frontiers in Endocrinology is to bring all relevant Endocrinology areas together on a single platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书