The comparison between short-term fertilization and conventional fertilization in in vitro fertilization treatment: a propensity score matching study.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Frontiers in Endocrinology Pub Date : 2026-10-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fendo.2026.1801741
Dong Han, Xueying Kong, Jie Liu, Yan Zhou, Shiping Chen, Xiaomiao Zhao, Caixia Liu, Chaofan Zhang
{"title":"The comparison between short-term fertilization and conventional fertilization in <i>in vitro</i> fertilization treatment: a propensity score matching study.","authors":"Dong Han, Xueying Kong, Jie Liu, Yan Zhou, Shiping Chen, Xiaomiao Zhao, Caixia Liu, Chaofan Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fendo.2026.1801741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Short-term IVF (S-IVF) is a fertilization approach to co-incubate the sperm and oocyte for a short duration and denude the cumulus cells afterwards. The S-IVF combined with early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) strategy can reduce the occurrence of both total fertilization failure (TFF) and the lower fertilization rate (<30%). However, there is still no consensus regarding the use of S-IVF. This study aimed to compare short-term <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (S-IVF) with conventional <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (C-IVF) in terms of fertilization, embryo developmental potential, and clinical outcomes. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to construct a 1:5 cohort of S-IVF and C-IVF cycles and compared fertilization, embryo developmental potential, and clinical outcomes between the two groups. We screened 68 S-IVF and 340 C-IVF patients (each in their first ART cycle-so cycle and patient numbers are identical) by baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the fertilization rate, and the secondary outcomes were the pregnancy rate and abortion rate in cohort. The results showed that the C-IVF group had a higher fertilization rate [84% vs. 78%, <i>p</i> < 0.05], two-pronucleus (2PN) rate [67% vs. 60%, <i>p</i> < 0.05], and one-pronucleus (1PN) rate [5% vs. 3%, <i>p</i> < 0.05] compared with the S-IVF group. Furthermore, in the C-IVF group, the zero-pronucleus (0PN) rate was lower than in the S-IVF group (11% vs. 20%, mean difference -9 percentage points, 95% CI -12.5 to -5.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The good-quality blastocyst rate was numerically higher in the C-IVF group than in the S-IVF group, but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate or abortion rate in cohort between the two groups (early abortion rate among clinical pregnancies: 15.1% [14/93] in C-IVF versus 13.0% [3/23] in S-IVF, <i>p</i> = 1.000). In conclusion, C-IVF had a higher fertilization rate, 2PN rate, and 1PN rate but a lower 0PN rate compared with S-IVF, while there was no difference in embryo development and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12447,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1801741"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13683159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1801741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Short-term IVF (S-IVF) is a fertilization approach to co-incubate the sperm and oocyte for a short duration and denude the cumulus cells afterwards. The S-IVF combined with early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) strategy can reduce the occurrence of both total fertilization failure (TFF) and the lower fertilization rate (<30%). However, there is still no consensus regarding the use of S-IVF. This study aimed to compare short-term in vitro fertilization (S-IVF) with conventional in vitro fertilization (C-IVF) in terms of fertilization, embryo developmental potential, and clinical outcomes. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to construct a 1:5 cohort of S-IVF and C-IVF cycles and compared fertilization, embryo developmental potential, and clinical outcomes between the two groups. We screened 68 S-IVF and 340 C-IVF patients (each in their first ART cycle-so cycle and patient numbers are identical) by baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the fertilization rate, and the secondary outcomes were the pregnancy rate and abortion rate in cohort. The results showed that the C-IVF group had a higher fertilization rate [84% vs. 78%, p < 0.05], two-pronucleus (2PN) rate [67% vs. 60%, p < 0.05], and one-pronucleus (1PN) rate [5% vs. 3%, p < 0.05] compared with the S-IVF group. Furthermore, in the C-IVF group, the zero-pronucleus (0PN) rate was lower than in the S-IVF group (11% vs. 20%, mean difference -9 percentage points, 95% CI -12.5 to -5.5, p < 0.001). The good-quality blastocyst rate was numerically higher in the C-IVF group than in the S-IVF group, but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate or abortion rate in cohort between the two groups (early abortion rate among clinical pregnancies: 15.1% [14/93] in C-IVF versus 13.0% [3/23] in S-IVF, p = 1.000). In conclusion, C-IVF had a higher fertilization rate, 2PN rate, and 1PN rate but a lower 0PN rate compared with S-IVF, while there was no difference in embryo development and clinical outcomes.

短期受精与常规受精在体外受精治疗中的比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
短期体外受精(S-IVF)是一种将精子和卵母细胞在短时间内共孵育,然后剥离积云细胞的受精方法。S-IVF联合早期抢救胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)策略在受精、胚胎发育潜能和临床结果方面均可减少总受精失败(TFF)的发生,并降低受精率(S-IVF)低于常规体外受精(C-IVF)。我们使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)构建了一个1:5的S-IVF和C-IVF周期队列,并比较了两组之间的受精、胚胎发育潜力和临床结果。我们根据基线特征筛选了68例S-IVF和340例C-IVF患者(每个患者都在他们的第一个ART周期-因此周期和患者数量相同)。队列的主要结局为受精率,次要结局为妊娠率和流产率。结果显示,C-IVF组受精率[84%比78%,p < 0.05],双原核(2PN)率[67%比60%,p < 0.05],单原核(1PN)率[5%比3%,p < 0.05]高于S-IVF组。此外,在C-IVF组中,零原核(0PN)率低于S-IVF组(11% vs. 20%,平均差异-9个百分点,95% CI -12.5 ~ -5.5, p < 0.001)。C-IVF组优质囊胚率数值上高于S-IVF组,但差异无统计学意义。两组队列妊娠率和流产率无显著差异(临床妊娠早期流产率:C-IVF为15.1% [14/93],S-IVF为13.0% [3/23],p = 1.000)。综上所述,与S-IVF相比,C-IVF的受精率、2PN率和1PN率较高,但0PN率较低,而胚胎发育和临床结局无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Frontiers in Endocrinology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
3023
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Endocrinology is a field journal of the "Frontiers in" journal series. In today’s world, endocrinology is becoming increasingly important as it underlies many of the challenges societies face - from obesity and diabetes to reproduction, population control and aging. Endocrinology covers a broad field from basic molecular and cellular communication through to clinical care and some of the most crucial public health issues. The journal, thus, welcomes outstanding contributions in any domain of endocrinology. Frontiers in Endocrinology publishes articles on the most outstanding discoveries across a wide research spectrum of Endocrinology. The mission of Frontiers in Endocrinology is to bring all relevant Endocrinology areas together on a single platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书