Walking with noise: the impact of auditory white noise stimulation on gait dynamics in young and older adults.

IF 5.8 3区 工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Pub Date : 2026-10-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2026.1910987
Michelle Gwerder, Yong K Kim, Paciane B Studer, Angela Frautschi, William R Taylor, Navrag B Singh
{"title":"Walking with noise: the impact of auditory white noise stimulation on gait dynamics in young and older adults.","authors":"Michelle Gwerder, Yong K Kim, Paciane B Studer, Angela Frautschi, William R Taylor, Navrag B Singh","doi":"10.3389/fbioe.2026.1910987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Walking is essential for maintaining autonomy and quality of life, yet age-related declines in sensory and motor function can impair gait control and increase fall risk. Auditory white noise stimulation may offer a simple approach to support sensorimotor function and enhance gait strategy. This effect may be particularly relevant in older adults, because their sensory signals are often diminished. This intervention study tested three hypotheses: 1) subthreshold auditory white noise stimulation enhances gait strategy more in older than in younger adults, 2), subthreshold auditory white noise stimulation has a greater impact on gait strategy than threshold and supra-threshold noise, and 3) the effects of auditory white noise persist beyond the period of stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty young (mean age 23.8 ± 2.3 years) and 50 older adults (68.1 ± 5.1 year) walked on a treadmill under baseline, three randomized white noise conditions (subthreshold, threshold, and supra-threshold), and a post-condition (Norm<sub>Post</sub>, approximately 15 min after stimulation). Linear mixed-effects models assessed spatiotemporal gait parameters, margin of stability, and gait variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older adults exhibited significantly shorter stride length (ES = 0.28) and greater variability across all gait parameters than younger adults (ES = 0.06-0.22). Auditory white noise significantly affected mean gait parameters, with age-dependent responses observed for most parameters. During subthreshold stimulation, older adults showed significantly reduced cadence (ES = 0.33) and step width (ES = 0.62), and increased stride time (ES = 0.5), support phases (ES = 0.39-0.64), stride length (ES = 0.49), and increased antero-posterior margin of stability (ES = 0.58) compared to baseline. No significant differences were found between the three auditory noise intensities. Several gait parameter changes remained evident in the Norm<sub>Post</sub> condition with some showing greater changes from baseline than during stimulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Auditory white noise stimulation was associated with changes in several gait parameters in older adults that were not observed in younger adults, suggesting age-dependent responses to auditory noise. The persistence of some effects beyond stimulation warrants further investigation into potential underlying sensorimotor and attentional mechanisms. While auditory white noise represents a non-invasive and easily implementable form of sensory stimulation, further studies are needed to establish its effects on gait strategy and fall risk, particularly during overground walking and in clinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12444,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","volume":"14 ","pages":"1910987"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13683698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1910987","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Walking is essential for maintaining autonomy and quality of life, yet age-related declines in sensory and motor function can impair gait control and increase fall risk. Auditory white noise stimulation may offer a simple approach to support sensorimotor function and enhance gait strategy. This effect may be particularly relevant in older adults, because their sensory signals are often diminished. This intervention study tested three hypotheses: 1) subthreshold auditory white noise stimulation enhances gait strategy more in older than in younger adults, 2), subthreshold auditory white noise stimulation has a greater impact on gait strategy than threshold and supra-threshold noise, and 3) the effects of auditory white noise persist beyond the period of stimulation.

Methods: Fifty young (mean age 23.8 ± 2.3 years) and 50 older adults (68.1 ± 5.1 year) walked on a treadmill under baseline, three randomized white noise conditions (subthreshold, threshold, and supra-threshold), and a post-condition (NormPost, approximately 15 min after stimulation). Linear mixed-effects models assessed spatiotemporal gait parameters, margin of stability, and gait variability.

Results: Older adults exhibited significantly shorter stride length (ES = 0.28) and greater variability across all gait parameters than younger adults (ES = 0.06-0.22). Auditory white noise significantly affected mean gait parameters, with age-dependent responses observed for most parameters. During subthreshold stimulation, older adults showed significantly reduced cadence (ES = 0.33) and step width (ES = 0.62), and increased stride time (ES = 0.5), support phases (ES = 0.39-0.64), stride length (ES = 0.49), and increased antero-posterior margin of stability (ES = 0.58) compared to baseline. No significant differences were found between the three auditory noise intensities. Several gait parameter changes remained evident in the NormPost condition with some showing greater changes from baseline than during stimulation.

Conclusion: Auditory white noise stimulation was associated with changes in several gait parameters in older adults that were not observed in younger adults, suggesting age-dependent responses to auditory noise. The persistence of some effects beyond stimulation warrants further investigation into potential underlying sensorimotor and attentional mechanisms. While auditory white noise represents a non-invasive and easily implementable form of sensory stimulation, further studies are needed to establish its effects on gait strategy and fall risk, particularly during overground walking and in clinical populations.

噪声行走:听觉白噪声刺激对年轻人和老年人步态动力学的影响。
背景:行走对于维持自主性和生活质量至关重要,然而与年龄相关的感觉和运动功能下降会损害步态控制并增加跌倒风险。听觉白噪声刺激可能提供支持感觉运动功能和增强步态策略的简单方法。这种影响可能与老年人特别相关,因为他们的感官信号经常减弱。本研究验证了三个假设:1)阈下听觉白噪声刺激对老年人步态策略的影响大于对年轻人的影响;2)阈下听觉白噪声刺激对步态策略的影响大于阈值和超阈值噪声;3)听觉白噪声的影响持续超过刺激期。方法:50名年轻人(平均年龄23.8±2.3岁)和50名老年人(68.1±5.1岁)在基线、三种随机白噪声条件(阈下、阈下和超阈下)和一种后条件(刺激后约15分钟的NormPost)下在跑步机上行走。线性混合效应模型评估了时空步态参数、稳定边际和步态变异性。结果:与年轻人相比,老年人步幅明显缩短(ES = 0.28),所有步态参数的变异性更大(ES = 0.06-0.22)。听觉白噪声显著影响平均步态参数,对大多数参数观察到年龄依赖性反应。在阈下刺激下,老年人的步速(ES = 0.33)和步宽(ES = 0.62)显著降低,步幅时间(ES = 0.5)、支撑阶段(ES = 0.39-0.64)、步幅长度(ES = 0.49)和前后稳定边缘(ES = 0.58)显著增加。三种听觉噪声强度之间无显著差异。在正常状态下,几个步态参数的变化仍然很明显,其中一些比刺激时的基线变化更大。结论:听觉白噪声刺激与老年人几种步态参数的变化有关,而这在年轻人中没有观察到,这表明听觉噪声的年龄依赖性反应。一些效应在刺激之外的持续性值得进一步研究潜在的感觉运动和注意机制。虽然听觉白噪声是一种非侵入性且易于实现的感觉刺激形式,但需要进一步研究确定其对步态策略和跌倒风险的影响,特别是在地上行走和临床人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
2270
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The translation of new discoveries in medicine to clinical routine has never been easy. During the second half of the last century, thanks to the progress in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmacology, we have seen the development and the application of a large number of drugs and devices aimed at the treatment of symptoms, blocking unwanted pathways and, in the case of infectious diseases, fighting the micro-organisms responsible. However, we are facing, today, a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to pathologies and diseases. Indeed, the challenge of the present and the next decade is to fully restore the physiological status of the diseased organism and to completely regenerate tissue and organs when they are so seriously affected that treatments cannot be limited to the repression of symptoms or to the repair of damage. This is being made possible thanks to the major developments made in basic cell and molecular biology, including stem cell science, growth factor delivery, gene isolation and transfection, the advances in bioengineering and nanotechnology, including development of new biomaterials, biofabrication technologies and use of bioreactors, and the big improvements in diagnostic tools and imaging of cells, tissues and organs. In today`s world, an enhancement of communication between multidisciplinary experts, together with the promotion of joint projects and close collaborations among scientists, engineers, industry people, regulatory agencies and physicians are absolute requirements for the success of any attempt to develop and clinically apply a new biological therapy or an innovative device involving the collective use of biomaterials, cells and/or bioactive molecules. “Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology” aspires to be a forum for all people involved in the process by bridging the gap too often existing between a discovery in the basic sciences and its clinical application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书