Charles S Black, Milen Kumar, Renato Miguel Reyes, J Kent Leach, Mark A Lee, Håvard Jostein Haugen, Thaqif El Khassawna, Maryam Rahmati, Augustine Mark Saiz
{"title":"Mesenchymal stromal cells in polytrauma: from immune dysregulation to therapeutic potential.","authors":"Charles S Black, Milen Kumar, Renato Miguel Reyes, J Kent Leach, Mark A Lee, Håvard Jostein Haugen, Thaqif El Khassawna, Maryam Rahmati, Augustine Mark Saiz","doi":"10.3389/fbioe.2026.1892227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polytrauma, defined as life-threatening injuries to multiple organ systems with an Injury Severity Score greater than 16, presents significant challenges for fracture healing, with nonunion rates substantially higher than in isolated fractures. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and subsequent immune dysregulation characteristic of polytrauma create a hostile microenvironment that impairs normal bone regeneration. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs; also termed mesenchymal stem/stromal cells) play critical roles in fracture healing through immunomodulation, osteogenic differentiation, and promotion of angiogenesis. However, emerging evidence suggests that MSC-mediated processes may be compromised in polytrauma settings. Importantly, direct evidence for endogenous MSC dysfunction in human polytrauma remains limited: much of the current understanding is inferred from isolated-fracture models, <i>in vitro</i> inflammatory-stimulation studies, and animal polytrauma systems rather than from controlled human trauma data. This review examines the mechanisms by which polytrauma is associated with disruption of MSC function, including altered macrophage polarization, excessive neutrophil activation, reduced regulatory T cell populations, and complement-mediated MSC injury. We synthesize the current understanding of MSC immunomodulatory effects in normal fracture healing and contrast this with their dysfunction in polytrauma, where MSCs adopt pro-inflammatory phenotypes and demonstrate impaired homing. Clinical applications of MSC-based therapies are discussed, including bone marrow aspirate concentrates and tissue-engineered constructs, alongside their potential for systemic immunomodulation in trauma patients. Throughout, we distinguish endogenous MSC behavior in polytrauma from exogenous MSC-based therapies, and we separate various MSC-based therapies as biologically and translationally distinct concepts. Finally, we outline critical knowledge gaps and propose future research directions, including development of representative polytrauma models, optimization of MSC delivery methods, and exploration of MSC-derived extracellular vesicles as therapeutic alternatives to improve outcomes in polytraumatized patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12444,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","volume":"14 ","pages":"1892227"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13680871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1892227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Polytrauma, defined as life-threatening injuries to multiple organ systems with an Injury Severity Score greater than 16, presents significant challenges for fracture healing, with nonunion rates substantially higher than in isolated fractures. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and subsequent immune dysregulation characteristic of polytrauma create a hostile microenvironment that impairs normal bone regeneration. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs; also termed mesenchymal stem/stromal cells) play critical roles in fracture healing through immunomodulation, osteogenic differentiation, and promotion of angiogenesis. However, emerging evidence suggests that MSC-mediated processes may be compromised in polytrauma settings. Importantly, direct evidence for endogenous MSC dysfunction in human polytrauma remains limited: much of the current understanding is inferred from isolated-fracture models, in vitro inflammatory-stimulation studies, and animal polytrauma systems rather than from controlled human trauma data. This review examines the mechanisms by which polytrauma is associated with disruption of MSC function, including altered macrophage polarization, excessive neutrophil activation, reduced regulatory T cell populations, and complement-mediated MSC injury. We synthesize the current understanding of MSC immunomodulatory effects in normal fracture healing and contrast this with their dysfunction in polytrauma, where MSCs adopt pro-inflammatory phenotypes and demonstrate impaired homing. Clinical applications of MSC-based therapies are discussed, including bone marrow aspirate concentrates and tissue-engineered constructs, alongside their potential for systemic immunomodulation in trauma patients. Throughout, we distinguish endogenous MSC behavior in polytrauma from exogenous MSC-based therapies, and we separate various MSC-based therapies as biologically and translationally distinct concepts. Finally, we outline critical knowledge gaps and propose future research directions, including development of representative polytrauma models, optimization of MSC delivery methods, and exploration of MSC-derived extracellular vesicles as therapeutic alternatives to improve outcomes in polytraumatized patients.
期刊介绍:
The translation of new discoveries in medicine to clinical routine has never been easy. During the second half of the last century, thanks to the progress in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmacology, we have seen the development and the application of a large number of drugs and devices aimed at the treatment of symptoms, blocking unwanted pathways and, in the case of infectious diseases, fighting the micro-organisms responsible. However, we are facing, today, a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to pathologies and diseases. Indeed, the challenge of the present and the next decade is to fully restore the physiological status of the diseased organism and to completely regenerate tissue and organs when they are so seriously affected that treatments cannot be limited to the repression of symptoms or to the repair of damage. This is being made possible thanks to the major developments made in basic cell and molecular biology, including stem cell science, growth factor delivery, gene isolation and transfection, the advances in bioengineering and nanotechnology, including development of new biomaterials, biofabrication technologies and use of bioreactors, and the big improvements in diagnostic tools and imaging of cells, tissues and organs.
In today`s world, an enhancement of communication between multidisciplinary experts, together with the promotion of joint projects and close collaborations among scientists, engineers, industry people, regulatory agencies and physicians are absolute requirements for the success of any attempt to develop and clinically apply a new biological therapy or an innovative device involving the collective use of biomaterials, cells and/or bioactive molecules. “Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology” aspires to be a forum for all people involved in the process by bridging the gap too often existing between a discovery in the basic sciences and its clinical application.