Unravelling teacher status through a socio-ecological lens: A comparative analysis of teacher and public perspectives in China

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
British Educational Research Journal Pub Date : 2026-10-22 Epub Date: 2026-03-06 DOI:10.1002/berj.70145
Jinqiu Jiang, Sun Yee Yip, Yanpin Li
{"title":"Unravelling teacher status through a socio-ecological lens: A comparative analysis of teacher and public perspectives in China","authors":"Jinqiu Jiang,&nbsp;Sun Yee Yip,&nbsp;Yanpin Li","doi":"10.1002/berj.70145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Raising the status of teachers is widely viewed as essential to addressing teacher shortages, yet the concept remains under-theorised and empirically fragmented. In this study, we draw on Bronfenbrenner's socio-ecological framework to explore how teacher status is constructed and perceived across multiple social levels. Using survey data from 2447 teachers and 5062 members of the public across 66 cities in 29 Chinese provinces, we apply LASSO regression to identify the key determinants of teacher status from both teachers' and the public's perspectives. Our findings reveal two distinct logics underpinning perceptions of status. Teachers emphasise experiential legitimacy, grounded in autonomy, participation in decision-making, and relational trust, while the public prioritises symbolic recognition, shaped by media portrayal, policy signals and formal credentials. Some factors, such as accountability, school-level involvement and parental respect, are significant only to teachers. Even for determinants that are shared between teachers and the public, the extent of their impact varies between the two groups. These differences reflect contrasting understandings of what constitutes teacher status. While teachers draw on their internal experiences and institutional engagement, the public's assessments rely on external cues. The study offers a theoretically grounded and empirically validated framework for understanding teacher status, with implications for education policy and cross-national research on the status of the teaching profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":51410,"journal":{"name":"British Educational Research Journal","volume":"52 5","pages":"3389-3419"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Educational Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/berj.70145","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Raising the status of teachers is widely viewed as essential to addressing teacher shortages, yet the concept remains under-theorised and empirically fragmented. In this study, we draw on Bronfenbrenner's socio-ecological framework to explore how teacher status is constructed and perceived across multiple social levels. Using survey data from 2447 teachers and 5062 members of the public across 66 cities in 29 Chinese provinces, we apply LASSO regression to identify the key determinants of teacher status from both teachers' and the public's perspectives. Our findings reveal two distinct logics underpinning perceptions of status. Teachers emphasise experiential legitimacy, grounded in autonomy, participation in decision-making, and relational trust, while the public prioritises symbolic recognition, shaped by media portrayal, policy signals and formal credentials. Some factors, such as accountability, school-level involvement and parental respect, are significant only to teachers. Even for determinants that are shared between teachers and the public, the extent of their impact varies between the two groups. These differences reflect contrasting understandings of what constitutes teacher status. While teachers draw on their internal experiences and institutional engagement, the public's assessments rely on external cues. The study offers a theoretically grounded and empirically validated framework for understanding teacher status, with implications for education policy and cross-national research on the status of the teaching profession.

社会生态视角下的教师地位解析:中国教师与公众视角的比较分析
提高教师的地位被广泛认为是解决教师短缺问题的关键,但这一概念仍然缺乏理论依据,而且在经验上也是支离破碎的。在本研究中,我们利用布朗芬布伦纳的社会生态框架来探讨教师地位是如何在多个社会层面上被构建和感知的。利用来自中国29个省66个城市的2447名教师和5062名公众的调查数据,我们运用LASSO回归从教师和公众的角度确定了教师地位的关键决定因素。我们的发现揭示了两种截然不同的逻辑,支撑着人们对地位的认知。教师强调基于自主性、决策参与和关系信任的经验合法性,而公众则优先考虑由媒体形象、政策信号和正式证书塑造的象征性认可。一些因素,如问责制、学校层面的参与和家长的尊重,只对教师有意义。即使对于教师和公众共有的决定因素,其影响程度在两个群体之间也有所不同。这些差异反映了对教师地位构成的不同理解。教师利用他们的内部经验和机构参与,而公众的评估依赖于外部线索。该研究为理解教师地位提供了一个理论基础和经验验证的框架,对教育政策和关于教师职业地位的跨国研究具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Educational Research Journal
British Educational Research Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The British Educational Research Journal is an international peer reviewed medium for the publication of articles of interest to researchers in education and has rapidly become a major focal point for the publication of educational research from throughout the world. For further information on the association please visit the British Educational Research Association web site. The journal is interdisciplinary in approach, and includes reports of case studies, experiments and surveys, discussions of conceptual and methodological issues and of underlying assumptions in educational research, accounts of research in progress, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书