Spectrotemporal Processing Using the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test and Its Relation to Cognition and Hearing Loss in Adults.

IF 2.2
Michael R Papazian, Katelyn A Berg, Andrea J DeFreese, Terrin N Tamati, Aaron C Moberly
{"title":"Spectrotemporal Processing Using the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test and Its Relation to Cognition and Hearing Loss in Adults.","authors":"Michael R Papazian, Katelyn A Berg, Andrea J DeFreese, Terrin N Tamati, Aaron C Moberly","doi":"10.1044/2026_JSLHR-26-00465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The three-alternative forced-choice design of the spectral-temporally modulated ripple test (SMRT) may capture both auditory and neurocognitive functioning. The relationships between neurocognitive functions and SMRT performance remain unexplored in middle-aged and older adults, as does the degree to which hearing loss may affect these relationships. This study hypothesized that better neurocognitive functions and better hearing would predict better SMRT performance and that hearing loss and neurocognitive functions would interact in contributing to SMRT performance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected from 81 adults recruited from a single tertiary care medical center with hearing abilities ranging from normal hearing to profound hearing loss. Relationships were examined among SMRT performance; unaided pure-tone average (PTA) at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz; age; nonverbal reasoning (Raven's Progressive Matrices [Raven's]); and short-term memory capacity (visual forward digit span).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bivariate analyses revealed that PTA, digit span, and Raven's scores were significantly associated with SMRT performance, whereas age was not. Multivariable linear regression confirmed these three as independent, significant predictors; age again was not. Interaction terms of PTA × Digit Span and PTA × Raven's were not significant predictors of SMRT performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neurocognitive functions of nonverbal reasoning and short-term memory capacity, as well as hearing ability, independently contribute to SMRT performance. Nonsignificant interactions suggest that the neurocognitive effects on SMRT are constant across degrees of hearing loss. These findings support ongoing use of SMRT in middle-aged and older adults with hearing loss, although the independent effects of neurocognitive functions should be accounted for, or at least considered, when interpreting SMRT performance.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.34595052.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_JSLHR-26-00465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The three-alternative forced-choice design of the spectral-temporally modulated ripple test (SMRT) may capture both auditory and neurocognitive functioning. The relationships between neurocognitive functions and SMRT performance remain unexplored in middle-aged and older adults, as does the degree to which hearing loss may affect these relationships. This study hypothesized that better neurocognitive functions and better hearing would predict better SMRT performance and that hearing loss and neurocognitive functions would interact in contributing to SMRT performance.

Method: Data were collected from 81 adults recruited from a single tertiary care medical center with hearing abilities ranging from normal hearing to profound hearing loss. Relationships were examined among SMRT performance; unaided pure-tone average (PTA) at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz; age; nonverbal reasoning (Raven's Progressive Matrices [Raven's]); and short-term memory capacity (visual forward digit span).

Results: Bivariate analyses revealed that PTA, digit span, and Raven's scores were significantly associated with SMRT performance, whereas age was not. Multivariable linear regression confirmed these three as independent, significant predictors; age again was not. Interaction terms of PTA × Digit Span and PTA × Raven's were not significant predictors of SMRT performance.

Conclusions: Neurocognitive functions of nonverbal reasoning and short-term memory capacity, as well as hearing ability, independently contribute to SMRT performance. Nonsignificant interactions suggest that the neurocognitive effects on SMRT are constant across degrees of hearing loss. These findings support ongoing use of SMRT in middle-aged and older adults with hearing loss, although the independent effects of neurocognitive functions should be accounted for, or at least considered, when interpreting SMRT performance.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.34595052.

使用频谱-时间调制纹波测试的光谱时间处理及其与成人认知和听力损失的关系。
目的:频谱-时间调制纹波测试(SMRT)的三选项强迫选择设计可以同时捕获听觉和神经认知功能。在中老年人中,神经认知功能和SMRT表现之间的关系以及听力损失对这些关系的影响程度仍未得到研究。本研究假设,更好的神经认知功能和更好的听力可以预测更好的SMRT成绩,听力损失和神经认知功能将相互作用,促进SMRT成绩。方法:从一家三级医疗中心招募81名听力正常到重度听力损失的成年人进行数据收集。考察了SMRT绩效之间的关系;500、1000和2000赫兹的无辅助纯音平均(PTA);年龄;非语言推理(Raven's Progressive Matrices);短期记忆能力(视觉前向数字广度)。结果:双变量分析显示,PTA、数字广度和Raven's分数与SMRT成绩显著相关,而年龄无关。多变量线性回归证实这三个是独立的、显著的预测因子;年龄也不是。交互作用项PTA ×位数跨度和PTA × Raven's对SMRT成绩无显著预测作用。结论:非语言推理和短期记忆能力的神经认知功能以及听力能力独立地影响SMRT的表现。不显著的相互作用表明,SMRT对神经认知的影响在不同程度的听力损失中是恒定的。这些发现支持中老年听力损失患者继续使用SMRT,尽管在解释SMRT效果时应考虑或至少考虑神经认知功能的独立影响。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.34595052。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书