Transarterial Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients With Impaired Renal Function Undergoing Endovascular Aortic Repair.

IF 0.7
Efthymios Beropoulis, Apostolos G Pitoulias, Theodosios Bisdas, Giovanni B Torsello, Giovanni Federico Torsello
{"title":"Transarterial Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients With Impaired Renal Function Undergoing Endovascular Aortic Repair.","authors":"Efthymios Beropoulis, Apostolos G Pitoulias, Theodosios Bisdas, Giovanni B Torsello, Giovanni Federico Torsello","doi":"10.1177/15385744261501882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeComputed tomography angiography (CTA) is crucial for preoperative planning and postoperative surveillance of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Renal function impairment however limits pre- and postoperative assessment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and diagnostic value of a novel technique in the setting of patients undergoing EVAR.Methods216 patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing transbrachial placement of an angiography catheter in the aorta for contrast medium administration were analyzed retrospectively. 45 patients with normal kidney function and aortic aneurysms were included as control group. 27 were female, 84 cases were for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, while 106 cases were for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Primary endpoint was the freedom from contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Secondary safety endpoints were freedom from access site complications and cerebrovascular incidents. Imaging quality endpoints were attenuation values and contrast-to-noise-ratios in predefined vessels, validated by intraclass correlation coefficients.ResultsMean creatinine change was -.11 mg/dL, mean GFR change was 2.13% in the intervention group. There were 10 (4.6%) false aneurysms and two access site hematoma (0.93%). Two cerebrovascular incidents (0.9%) were transient. Transarterial CTA attenuation values varied between 210.4 (±89) and 241.4 (±98) Hounsfield units (HU), and 306.35 (±63.27) to 321.39 (±70.12) HU in the control group. The mean amount of contrast medium used in the catheter group was significantly reduced (31.70 ± 5.82 mL) compared to the control group (<i>P</i> = .001). Contrast-to-noise ratios varied between 9.1 (±4.6) and 11.1 (±4.4. Intraclass correlation coefficients between the readings were very good (0.987-0.992).ConclusionCatheter-based transarterial computed tomographic angiography is a safe and efficacious way to evaluate patients with aortic aneurysms, both prior and after EVAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15385744261501882"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744261501882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeComputed tomography angiography (CTA) is crucial for preoperative planning and postoperative surveillance of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Renal function impairment however limits pre- and postoperative assessment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and diagnostic value of a novel technique in the setting of patients undergoing EVAR.Methods216 patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing transbrachial placement of an angiography catheter in the aorta for contrast medium administration were analyzed retrospectively. 45 patients with normal kidney function and aortic aneurysms were included as control group. 27 were female, 84 cases were for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, while 106 cases were for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Primary endpoint was the freedom from contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Secondary safety endpoints were freedom from access site complications and cerebrovascular incidents. Imaging quality endpoints were attenuation values and contrast-to-noise-ratios in predefined vessels, validated by intraclass correlation coefficients.ResultsMean creatinine change was -.11 mg/dL, mean GFR change was 2.13% in the intervention group. There were 10 (4.6%) false aneurysms and two access site hematoma (0.93%). Two cerebrovascular incidents (0.9%) were transient. Transarterial CTA attenuation values varied between 210.4 (±89) and 241.4 (±98) Hounsfield units (HU), and 306.35 (±63.27) to 321.39 (±70.12) HU in the control group. The mean amount of contrast medium used in the catheter group was significantly reduced (31.70 ± 5.82 mL) compared to the control group (P = .001). Contrast-to-noise ratios varied between 9.1 (±4.6) and 11.1 (±4.4. Intraclass correlation coefficients between the readings were very good (0.987-0.992).ConclusionCatheter-based transarterial computed tomographic angiography is a safe and efficacious way to evaluate patients with aortic aneurysms, both prior and after EVAR.

经动脉ct血管造影在血管内主动脉修复肾功能受损患者中的应用。
目的计算机断层血管造影(CTA)对血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)的术前规划和术后监测至关重要。然而,肾功能损害限制了术前和术后的评估。我们研究的目的是评估一种新技术在EVAR患者中的安全性和诊断价值。方法回顾性分析216例慢性肾脏病患者经肱动脉置管造影剂给药的临床资料。选取45例肾功能正常且主动脉瘤患者作为对照组。其中女性27例,胸腹主动脉瘤84例,腹主动脉瘤106例。主要终点是没有造影剂引起的急性肾损伤。次要安全终点是无通路并发症和脑血管事件。成像质量终点是预定义血管中的衰减值和噪声对比比,并通过类内相关系数进行验证。结果干预组平均肌酐变化为- 0.11 mg/dL,平均GFR变化为2.13%。假性动脉瘤10例(4.6%),通路血肿2例(0.93%)。2例(0.9%)为短暂性脑血管事件。经动脉CTA衰减值为210.4(±89)~ 241.4(±98)Hounsfield单位(HU),对照组为306.35(±63.27)~ 321.39(±70.12)HU。导管组造影剂平均用量较对照组明显减少(31.70±5.82 mL) (P = .001)。对比噪声比在9.1(±4.6)和11.1(±4.4)之间变化。各读数间的类内相关系数为0.987 ~ 0.992。结论基于导管的经动脉计算机断层血管造影是一种安全有效的评估动脉瘤患者EVAR前后的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书