Centering Patient Health Over Legal Status: A Student-Driven Cannabis Risk Stratification Framework for Undergraduate Medical Education.

IF 2.4
Jessie J Liu, Sydney Moore, Xiadi Zhai, Rory Vu Mather, William Oles, Ivo Cerda, Patrick McGuire, Hilary S Connery
{"title":"Centering Patient Health Over Legal Status: A Student-Driven Cannabis Risk Stratification Framework for Undergraduate Medical Education.","authors":"Jessie J Liu, Sydney Moore, Xiadi Zhai, Rory Vu Mather, William Oles, Ivo Cerda, Patrick McGuire, Hilary S Connery","doi":"10.1177/29767342261489469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cannabis use is increasing worldwide, both for evidence-supported indications and conditions with limited evidence such as anxiety, depression, and chronic pain. Although incongruence between state and federal cannabis laws has delayed expanding cannabis education within medical schools, patients will continue to use cannabis and physicians must be prepared to counsel them. Therefore, evidence-informed cannabis education is needed to prepare medical students to discuss cannabis use using a patient-centered and harm reduction-oriented framework rather than relying on legal status alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We convened a student-faculty working group in addiction psychiatry, addiction medicine, and pain medicine to develop a practical teaching framework grounded in peer-reviewed literature on cannabis-related risks, patterns of use, and patient counseling. We reviewed existing cannabis curricula and identified points within medical school courses where this content could be incorporated without major restructuring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We developed a Cannabis Use Risk Stratification Framework intended to help medical students organize cannabis-related health benefits and risks into teachable categories based on use-related (frequency, potency, and route) and patient-related (age, comorbidities, and functional impact) factors. The framework is taught in two 1-hour sessions: a preclinical lecture introducing the framework, and a preclerkship session using cases and simulations to apply it. By centering discussion on patient health and harm reduction rather than legality alone, the framework remains applicable across jurisdictions and provides students with a role in clinical encounters: obtaining a cannabis history, identifying benefits and potential risk factors, and delivering brief, educational counseling to promote shared decision-making.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This framework addresses a foundational gap in undergraduate medical education by providing an educational approach to discussing cannabis-related benefit and risk that is adaptable across institutions, resource settings, and jurisdictions. The risk categories are pragmatic and teachable, offering learners a conceptual framework for recognizing when cannabis use warrants monitoring, brief counseling, or escalation to formal intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342261489469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342261489469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cannabis use is increasing worldwide, both for evidence-supported indications and conditions with limited evidence such as anxiety, depression, and chronic pain. Although incongruence between state and federal cannabis laws has delayed expanding cannabis education within medical schools, patients will continue to use cannabis and physicians must be prepared to counsel them. Therefore, evidence-informed cannabis education is needed to prepare medical students to discuss cannabis use using a patient-centered and harm reduction-oriented framework rather than relying on legal status alone.

Methods: We convened a student-faculty working group in addiction psychiatry, addiction medicine, and pain medicine to develop a practical teaching framework grounded in peer-reviewed literature on cannabis-related risks, patterns of use, and patient counseling. We reviewed existing cannabis curricula and identified points within medical school courses where this content could be incorporated without major restructuring.

Results: We developed a Cannabis Use Risk Stratification Framework intended to help medical students organize cannabis-related health benefits and risks into teachable categories based on use-related (frequency, potency, and route) and patient-related (age, comorbidities, and functional impact) factors. The framework is taught in two 1-hour sessions: a preclinical lecture introducing the framework, and a preclerkship session using cases and simulations to apply it. By centering discussion on patient health and harm reduction rather than legality alone, the framework remains applicable across jurisdictions and provides students with a role in clinical encounters: obtaining a cannabis history, identifying benefits and potential risk factors, and delivering brief, educational counseling to promote shared decision-making.

Discussion: This framework addresses a foundational gap in undergraduate medical education by providing an educational approach to discussing cannabis-related benefit and risk that is adaptable across institutions, resource settings, and jurisdictions. The risk categories are pragmatic and teachable, offering learners a conceptual framework for recognizing when cannabis use warrants monitoring, brief counseling, or escalation to formal intervention.

以患者健康为中心的法律地位:学生驱动的本科医学教育大麻风险分层框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书