{"title":"Human-centered design of risk communication for flooded home remediation.","authors":"Keely B Maxwell, Chandler Milhollin","doi":"10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After a flood, housing recovery is essential to overall household and community recovery. People need to get back into their homes to do cleaning and repairs. Flooded homes, though, pose secondary health risks from mold, bacteria, asbestos, lead, carbon monoxide, and other environmental and structural hazards. While there is technical guidance on safely remediating flooded homes, there is still an absence of risk communication resources for flood survivors that consider the social and environmental conditions in which they make repair decisions. A project team from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used a human-centered design approach to produce how-to videos and a website to help homeowners, renters, and volunteers safely muck out and fix up flooded homes. This article presents a methodology for operationalizing the disaster and health behavioral social sciences into design choices for risk communication tools for flooded home remediation. It does so by bringing together threat appraisal, coping appraisal, and agency, or the capacity to act, into review criteria for video scripts and for the website format and content. The project team carried out discovery research to understand user needs through focus groups and interviews with flood survivors, volunteers, disaster social scientists, and EPA staff; problem definition by creating user personas and design principles and criteria; ideation to develop draft videos and website organization and content; and testing to get feedback and refine the prototype. The article discusses opportunities and limitations for using human-centered design that engineers and interdisciplinary teams can use in the development of risk communication to reduce pre- and post-flooding risks and support housing recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":51262,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards Review","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13679725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
After a flood, housing recovery is essential to overall household and community recovery. People need to get back into their homes to do cleaning and repairs. Flooded homes, though, pose secondary health risks from mold, bacteria, asbestos, lead, carbon monoxide, and other environmental and structural hazards. While there is technical guidance on safely remediating flooded homes, there is still an absence of risk communication resources for flood survivors that consider the social and environmental conditions in which they make repair decisions. A project team from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used a human-centered design approach to produce how-to videos and a website to help homeowners, renters, and volunteers safely muck out and fix up flooded homes. This article presents a methodology for operationalizing the disaster and health behavioral social sciences into design choices for risk communication tools for flooded home remediation. It does so by bringing together threat appraisal, coping appraisal, and agency, or the capacity to act, into review criteria for video scripts and for the website format and content. The project team carried out discovery research to understand user needs through focus groups and interviews with flood survivors, volunteers, disaster social scientists, and EPA staff; problem definition by creating user personas and design principles and criteria; ideation to develop draft videos and website organization and content; and testing to get feedback and refine the prototype. The article discusses opportunities and limitations for using human-centered design that engineers and interdisciplinary teams can use in the development of risk communication to reduce pre- and post-flooding risks and support housing recovery.
期刊介绍:
The Natural Hazards Review addresses the range of events, processes, and consequences that occur when natural hazards interact with the physical, social, economic, and engineered dimensions of communities and the people who live, work, and play in them. As these conditions interact and change, the impact on human communities increases in size, scale, and scope. Such interactions necessarily need to be analyzed from an interdisciplinary perspective that includes both social and technical measures. For decision makers, the risk presents the challenge of managing known hazards, but unknown consequences in time of occurrence, scale of impact, and level of disruption in actual communities with limited resources. The journal is dedicated to bringing together the physical, social, and behavioral sciences; engineering; and the regulatory and policy environments to provide a forum for cutting edge, holistic, and cross-disciplinary approaches to anticipating risk, loss, and cost reduction from natural hazards. The journal welcomes rigorous research on the intersection between social and technical systems that advances concepts of resilience within lifeline and infrastructure systems and the organizations that manage them for all hazards. It offers a professional forum for researchers and practitioners working together to publish the results of truly interdisciplinary and partnered approaches to the anticipation of risk, loss reduction, and community resilience. Engineering topics covered include the characterization of hazard forces and the planning, design, construction, maintenance, performance, and use of structures in the physical environment. Social and behavioral sciences topics include analysis of the impact of hazards on communities and the organizations that seek to mitigate and manage response to hazards.