Human-centered design of risk communication for flooded home remediation.

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Natural Hazards Review Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-13 DOI:10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2689
Keely B Maxwell, Chandler Milhollin
{"title":"Human-centered design of risk communication for flooded home remediation.","authors":"Keely B Maxwell, Chandler Milhollin","doi":"10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After a flood, housing recovery is essential to overall household and community recovery. People need to get back into their homes to do cleaning and repairs. Flooded homes, though, pose secondary health risks from mold, bacteria, asbestos, lead, carbon monoxide, and other environmental and structural hazards. While there is technical guidance on safely remediating flooded homes, there is still an absence of risk communication resources for flood survivors that consider the social and environmental conditions in which they make repair decisions. A project team from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used a human-centered design approach to produce how-to videos and a website to help homeowners, renters, and volunteers safely muck out and fix up flooded homes. This article presents a methodology for operationalizing the disaster and health behavioral social sciences into design choices for risk communication tools for flooded home remediation. It does so by bringing together threat appraisal, coping appraisal, and agency, or the capacity to act, into review criteria for video scripts and for the website format and content. The project team carried out discovery research to understand user needs through focus groups and interviews with flood survivors, volunteers, disaster social scientists, and EPA staff; problem definition by creating user personas and design principles and criteria; ideation to develop draft videos and website organization and content; and testing to get feedback and refine the prototype. The article discusses opportunities and limitations for using human-centered design that engineers and interdisciplinary teams can use in the development of risk communication to reduce pre- and post-flooding risks and support housing recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":51262,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards Review","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13679725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After a flood, housing recovery is essential to overall household and community recovery. People need to get back into their homes to do cleaning and repairs. Flooded homes, though, pose secondary health risks from mold, bacteria, asbestos, lead, carbon monoxide, and other environmental and structural hazards. While there is technical guidance on safely remediating flooded homes, there is still an absence of risk communication resources for flood survivors that consider the social and environmental conditions in which they make repair decisions. A project team from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used a human-centered design approach to produce how-to videos and a website to help homeowners, renters, and volunteers safely muck out and fix up flooded homes. This article presents a methodology for operationalizing the disaster and health behavioral social sciences into design choices for risk communication tools for flooded home remediation. It does so by bringing together threat appraisal, coping appraisal, and agency, or the capacity to act, into review criteria for video scripts and for the website format and content. The project team carried out discovery research to understand user needs through focus groups and interviews with flood survivors, volunteers, disaster social scientists, and EPA staff; problem definition by creating user personas and design principles and criteria; ideation to develop draft videos and website organization and content; and testing to get feedback and refine the prototype. The article discusses opportunities and limitations for using human-centered design that engineers and interdisciplinary teams can use in the development of risk communication to reduce pre- and post-flooding risks and support housing recovery.

以人为本的洪水家庭修复风险沟通设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Hazards Review
Natural Hazards Review ENGINEERING, CIVIL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
72
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Natural Hazards Review addresses the range of events, processes, and consequences that occur when natural hazards interact with the physical, social, economic, and engineered dimensions of communities and the people who live, work, and play in them. As these conditions interact and change, the impact on human communities increases in size, scale, and scope. Such interactions necessarily need to be analyzed from an interdisciplinary perspective that includes both social and technical measures. For decision makers, the risk presents the challenge of managing known hazards, but unknown consequences in time of occurrence, scale of impact, and level of disruption in actual communities with limited resources. The journal is dedicated to bringing together the physical, social, and behavioral sciences; engineering; and the regulatory and policy environments to provide a forum for cutting edge, holistic, and cross-disciplinary approaches to anticipating risk, loss, and cost reduction from natural hazards. The journal welcomes rigorous research on the intersection between social and technical systems that advances concepts of resilience within lifeline and infrastructure systems and the organizations that manage them for all hazards. It offers a professional forum for researchers and practitioners working together to publish the results of truly interdisciplinary and partnered approaches to the anticipation of risk, loss reduction, and community resilience. Engineering topics covered include the characterization of hazard forces and the planning, design, construction, maintenance, performance, and use of structures in the physical environment. Social and behavioral sciences topics include analysis of the impact of hazards on communities and the organizations that seek to mitigate and manage response to hazards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书