Venous wash-out at contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the identification of hematologic splenic lesions: an exploratory real-world substudy.

IF 1.6 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Daniela Tirotta, Claudia Lena, Elisabetta Fabbri, Paolo Muratori
{"title":"Venous wash-out at contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the identification of hematologic splenic lesions: an exploratory real-world substudy.","authors":"Daniela Tirotta, Claudia Lena, Elisabetta Fabbri, Paolo Muratori","doi":"10.1007/s40477-026-01236-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Splenic lesions are a relatively rare but clinically relevant finding in internal medicine practice, particularly when hematologic or lymphoproliferative disorders are suspected. The aim of this exploratory subanalysis was to evaluate the role of CEUS perfusion patterns, with particular attention to venous wash-out and its timing, in discriminating between hematologic and non-hematologic disease in a real-world Internal Medicine cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exploratory retrospective subanalysis was conducted on patients included in the intervention arm of a multicenter Quality Improvement study evaluating a structured contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-based diagnostic pathway in newly identified splenic lesions. Consecutive adult patients with newly detected splenic lesions identified on B-mode ultrasound who underwent CEUS as part of the initial diagnostic evaluation were included. CEUS perfusion patterns were qualitatively classified according to arterial wash-in, venous wash-out, and wash-out timing. The diagnostic reference standard consisted of histologic and/or cytologic examination when available, or integration of clinical, laboratory, and imaging follow-up data within 90 days. In patients without histologic confirmation, non-hematologic classification required clinical and laboratory stability or improvement, stability or resolution of the splenic lesion on follow-up imaging, identification of an alternative non-hematologic diagnosis when present, and absence of a hematologic diagnosis during the 90-day follow-up. In line with the parent study, one patient in the intervention-arm cohort did not receive a definitive lesion-specific etiologic diagnosis within 90 days; however, no patient remained indeterminate for the prespecified binary endpoint because classification as hematologic versus non-hematologic was possible in all cases. The study endpoint was binary diagnostic classification (hematologic vs non-hematologic).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were included, of whom 11 (22%) had a hematologic diagnosis and 39 (78%) had a non-hematologic diagnosis. In univariable analysis, multiple lesions, systemic symptoms, and especially venous wash-out were associated with hematologic diagnosis. Venous wash-out was present in 10/11 hematologic cases and in 3/39 non-hematologic cases. In hematologic cases, wash-out was almost always early (< 60 s), whereas in the few non-hematologic cases with wash-out it was late. In the exploratory multivariable model, venous wash-out was the only variable independently associated with hematologic diagnosis. Because of the small number of hematologic events, this association should be interpreted as statistically unstable and hypothesis-generating. Venous wash-out showed a sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 92.3%, positive predictive value of 76.9%, negative predictive value of 97.3%, and accuracy of 92.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with newly identified splenic lesions, venous wash-out at CEUS, particularly if early, was the pattern most strongly associated with hematologic diagnosis in this cohort. The absence of wash-out was associated with a low probability of hematologic disease, suggesting a possible utility of CEUS in diagnostic rule-out in real-world Internal Medicine settings. However, diagnostic performance estimates, particularly negative predictive value, should be interpreted cautiously in view of the low prevalence of hematologic disease and the exploratory sample size. These findings require confirmation in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-026-01236-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Splenic lesions are a relatively rare but clinically relevant finding in internal medicine practice, particularly when hematologic or lymphoproliferative disorders are suspected. The aim of this exploratory subanalysis was to evaluate the role of CEUS perfusion patterns, with particular attention to venous wash-out and its timing, in discriminating between hematologic and non-hematologic disease in a real-world Internal Medicine cohort.

Methods: An exploratory retrospective subanalysis was conducted on patients included in the intervention arm of a multicenter Quality Improvement study evaluating a structured contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-based diagnostic pathway in newly identified splenic lesions. Consecutive adult patients with newly detected splenic lesions identified on B-mode ultrasound who underwent CEUS as part of the initial diagnostic evaluation were included. CEUS perfusion patterns were qualitatively classified according to arterial wash-in, venous wash-out, and wash-out timing. The diagnostic reference standard consisted of histologic and/or cytologic examination when available, or integration of clinical, laboratory, and imaging follow-up data within 90 days. In patients without histologic confirmation, non-hematologic classification required clinical and laboratory stability or improvement, stability or resolution of the splenic lesion on follow-up imaging, identification of an alternative non-hematologic diagnosis when present, and absence of a hematologic diagnosis during the 90-day follow-up. In line with the parent study, one patient in the intervention-arm cohort did not receive a definitive lesion-specific etiologic diagnosis within 90 days; however, no patient remained indeterminate for the prespecified binary endpoint because classification as hematologic versus non-hematologic was possible in all cases. The study endpoint was binary diagnostic classification (hematologic vs non-hematologic).

Results: Fifty patients were included, of whom 11 (22%) had a hematologic diagnosis and 39 (78%) had a non-hematologic diagnosis. In univariable analysis, multiple lesions, systemic symptoms, and especially venous wash-out were associated with hematologic diagnosis. Venous wash-out was present in 10/11 hematologic cases and in 3/39 non-hematologic cases. In hematologic cases, wash-out was almost always early (< 60 s), whereas in the few non-hematologic cases with wash-out it was late. In the exploratory multivariable model, venous wash-out was the only variable independently associated with hematologic diagnosis. Because of the small number of hematologic events, this association should be interpreted as statistically unstable and hypothesis-generating. Venous wash-out showed a sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 92.3%, positive predictive value of 76.9%, negative predictive value of 97.3%, and accuracy of 92.0%.

Conclusion: In patients with newly identified splenic lesions, venous wash-out at CEUS, particularly if early, was the pattern most strongly associated with hematologic diagnosis in this cohort. The absence of wash-out was associated with a low probability of hematologic disease, suggesting a possible utility of CEUS in diagnostic rule-out in real-world Internal Medicine settings. However, diagnostic performance estimates, particularly negative predictive value, should be interpreted cautiously in view of the low prevalence of hematologic disease and the exploratory sample size. These findings require confirmation in larger cohorts.

对比增强超声静脉冲洗用于血液学脾脏病变的识别:一项探索性的现实世界亚研究。
目的:脾脏病变是一种相对罕见但与临床相关的内科疾病,特别是当怀疑血液或淋巴增生性疾病时。本探索性亚分析的目的是评估超声造影灌注模式的作用,特别注意静脉冲洗及其时间,在现实世界的内科队列中区分血液和非血液疾病。方法:对一项多中心质量改善研究干预组的患者进行探索性回顾性亚分析,该研究评估了基于结构对比增强超声(CEUS)的诊断途径对新发现的脾病变的诊断。连续的成年患者在b超上发现新发现的脾脏病变,并接受超声造影作为初始诊断评估的一部分。超声造影灌注模式根据动脉冲洗、静脉冲洗和冲洗时间进行定性分类。诊断参考标准包括组织学和/或细胞学检查,或在90天内整合临床、实验室和影像学随访数据。在没有组织学证实的患者中,非血液学分类需要临床和实验室稳定性或改善,脾脏病变在随访影像学上的稳定性或消退,当有替代的非血液学诊断时的识别,以及在90天随访期间没有血液学诊断。与母研究一致,干预组队列中的一名患者在90天内没有得到明确的病变特异性病因诊断;然而,由于所有病例都可以分为血液学和非血液学,因此没有患者在预先指定的二元终点仍然是不确定的。研究终点为二元诊断分类(血液学与非血液学)。结果:纳入50例患者,其中11例(22%)有血液学诊断,39例(78%)有非血液学诊断。在单变量分析中,多发性病变、全身性症状,尤其是静脉冲洗与血液学诊断相关。10/11血液学病例和3/39非血液学病例出现静脉冲洗。在血液学病例中,冲洗几乎总是早期的(结论:在新发现的脾病变患者中,超声造影下的静脉冲洗,特别是早期,是与血液学诊断最密切相关的模式。没有洗脱与血液学疾病的低概率相关,提示超声造影在真实内科环境中的诊断排除中可能具有实用价值。然而,鉴于血液病的低患病率和探索性样本量,诊断性能估计,特别是阴性预测值,应谨慎解释。这些发现需要在更大的队列中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书