The Moral Economy of Nursing Time: Low-Value Nursing Work, Moral Opportunity Cost and Good Nursing.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Heran Zhang, Ying Shen
{"title":"The Moral Economy of Nursing Time: Low-Value Nursing Work, Moral Opportunity Cost and Good Nursing.","authors":"Heran Zhang, Ying Shen","doi":"10.1111/nup.70134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nurses work within finite time, competing demands and increasingly auditable systems. This philosophical paper asks what care is lost when organisations and nurses commit scarce time and attention to comparatively lower-value work, and when that loss becomes morally significant. It introduces nursing capacity, the moral economy of nursing time and moral opportunity cost to examine that question. Moral opportunity cost is conditional: it applies only where scarcity is genuine, competing claims differ in moral significance and the work performed plausibly displaces the alternative. We argue that visibility asymmetry-in which auditable work is more easily protected than relational or anticipatory care-can make this loss hard to see. The framework positions de-implementation as ethical reallocation rather than mere reduction: capacity released by removing a practice should be protected for higher-value care or rest and recovery, with safeguards against burden shifting. The paper offers a vocabulary for examining allocation systems, rather than individual nurses alone, as subjects of nursing ethics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":"27 4","pages":"e70134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.70134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nurses work within finite time, competing demands and increasingly auditable systems. This philosophical paper asks what care is lost when organisations and nurses commit scarce time and attention to comparatively lower-value work, and when that loss becomes morally significant. It introduces nursing capacity, the moral economy of nursing time and moral opportunity cost to examine that question. Moral opportunity cost is conditional: it applies only where scarcity is genuine, competing claims differ in moral significance and the work performed plausibly displaces the alternative. We argue that visibility asymmetry-in which auditable work is more easily protected than relational or anticipatory care-can make this loss hard to see. The framework positions de-implementation as ethical reallocation rather than mere reduction: capacity released by removing a practice should be protected for higher-value care or rest and recovery, with safeguards against burden shifting. The paper offers a vocabulary for examining allocation systems, rather than individual nurses alone, as subjects of nursing ethics.

护理时间的道德经济:低价值护理工作、道德机会成本与优质护理。
护士在有限的时间内工作,竞争的需求和越来越可审计的系统。这篇哲学论文的问题是,当组织和护士将稀缺的时间和注意力投入到价值相对较低的工作上,以及当这种损失在道德上变得重大时,我们失去了什么关怀。它引入了护理能力,护理时间的道德经济和道德机会成本来检验这个问题。道德机会成本是有条件的:它只适用于稀缺是真实存在的、相互竞争的主张在道德意义上有所不同、所做的工作似乎取代了另一种选择的情况。我们认为,可见性不对称——可审计工作比关系性或预见性护理更容易受到保护——会使这种损失难以被发现。该框架将取消执行定位为道德上的重新分配,而不仅仅是减少:取消一种做法所释放的能力应得到保护,用于更高价值的护理或休息和康复,并防范负担转移。本文提供了一个词汇表来检查分配系统,而不是单独的护士个人,作为护理伦理的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Philosophy provides a forum for discussion of philosophical issues in nursing. These focus on questions relating to the nature of nursing and to the phenomena of key relevance to it. For example, any understanding of what nursing is presupposes some conception of just what nurses are trying to do when they nurse. But what are the ends of nursing? Are they to promote health, prevent disease, promote well-being, enhance autonomy, relieve suffering, or some combination of these? How are these ends are to be met? What kind of knowledge is needed in order to nurse? Practical, theoretical, aesthetic, moral, political, ''intuitive'' or some other? Papers that explore other aspects of philosophical enquiry and analysis of relevance to nursing (and any other healthcare or social care activity) are also welcome and might include, but not be limited to, critical discussions of the work of nurse theorists who have advanced philosophical claims (e.g., Benner, Benner and Wrubel, Carper, Schrok, Watson, Parse and so on) as well as critical engagement with philosophers (e.g., Heidegger, Husserl, Kuhn, Polanyi, Taylor, MacIntyre and so on) whose work informs health care in general and nursing in particular.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书