Nursing's Long History of Mutual Aid.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Sam Porter
{"title":"Nursing's Long History of Mutual Aid.","authors":"Sam Porter","doi":"10.1111/nup.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The doctrine of mutual aid and its application to nursing has recently enjoyed considerable attention in the pages of Nursing Philosophy. However, this is not the first time that nursing theorists have identified its salience to nursing. In 1907, Adelaide Nutting and Lavinia Dock specified mutual aid as the evolutionary impulse upon which the activity of nursing is founded. Nutting and Dock adopted mutual aid from Peter Kropotkin's application of Russian evolutionary theory to anarchism. Russian natural scientists argued that Darwin had overemphasised struggle and under-emphasised cooperation in his theory of natural selection. Just as Kropotkin sought to uncover the mundane relations of mutual support that were the bedrock of species' success, Nutting and Dock aimed to bring to light the unsung history of nursing's crucial contribution to humanity through its enactment of mutual aid in healthcare. They took a gendered approach, which assumed that the ability to engage in mutual aid was a function of the capacity to care which, in turn, was more developed in women. They also took a reformist approach in contrast to their anarchist contemporaries, who advocated revolution. After addressing contemporary dilemmas about the purpose and possibility of mutual aid, the articulation of Nutting and Dock's feminism with difference and neo-Darwinian feminisms are noted. In examining the relationship of their approach with contemporary ecological theory, Nutting and Dock's evolutionary grounding for mutual aid is compared favourably with contemporary anarchism's exclusively political approach, though both are excessively human-centred. It is concluded that the most important message we can take from Nutting and Dock is that survival depends on mutual aid and that nurses have the potential to be key actors in its instantiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":"27 4","pages":"e70127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13682686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.70127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The doctrine of mutual aid and its application to nursing has recently enjoyed considerable attention in the pages of Nursing Philosophy. However, this is not the first time that nursing theorists have identified its salience to nursing. In 1907, Adelaide Nutting and Lavinia Dock specified mutual aid as the evolutionary impulse upon which the activity of nursing is founded. Nutting and Dock adopted mutual aid from Peter Kropotkin's application of Russian evolutionary theory to anarchism. Russian natural scientists argued that Darwin had overemphasised struggle and under-emphasised cooperation in his theory of natural selection. Just as Kropotkin sought to uncover the mundane relations of mutual support that were the bedrock of species' success, Nutting and Dock aimed to bring to light the unsung history of nursing's crucial contribution to humanity through its enactment of mutual aid in healthcare. They took a gendered approach, which assumed that the ability to engage in mutual aid was a function of the capacity to care which, in turn, was more developed in women. They also took a reformist approach in contrast to their anarchist contemporaries, who advocated revolution. After addressing contemporary dilemmas about the purpose and possibility of mutual aid, the articulation of Nutting and Dock's feminism with difference and neo-Darwinian feminisms are noted. In examining the relationship of their approach with contemporary ecological theory, Nutting and Dock's evolutionary grounding for mutual aid is compared favourably with contemporary anarchism's exclusively political approach, though both are excessively human-centred. It is concluded that the most important message we can take from Nutting and Dock is that survival depends on mutual aid and that nurses have the potential to be key actors in its instantiation.

护理互助的悠久历史。
互助原则及其在护理中的应用最近在护理哲学中得到了相当大的关注。然而,这并不是护理理论家第一次发现它对护理的重要性。1907年,阿德莱德·纳廷和拉维尼亚·多克将互助规定为护理活动建立的进化动力。纳廷和多克从克鲁泡特金对俄国进化论在无政府主义中的应用中获得了互助。俄罗斯自然科学家认为,达尔文在他的自然选择理论中过分强调斗争,而低估了合作。就像克鲁波特金试图揭示相互支持的世俗关系是物种成功的基石一样,纳廷和多克旨在通过制定医疗保健中的互助来揭示护理对人类做出重要贡献的无名历史。他们采用了一种性别方法,假设参与互助的能力是照顾能力的一种功能,而照顾能力在女性中更为发达。他们还采取了一种改良主义的方法,这与他们主张革命的无政府主义同时代人形成了鲜明对比。在探讨了互助的目的和可能性的当代困境之后,注意到纳廷和多克的差异女性主义与新达尔文女性主义的结合。在研究他们的方法与当代生态理论的关系时,纳廷和多克互助的进化基础与当代无政府主义的专一政治方法相比是有利的,尽管两者都过于以人为中心。结论是,我们可以从纳廷和多克身上得到的最重要的信息是,生存依赖于互助,护士有可能成为互助实例中的关键角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Philosophy provides a forum for discussion of philosophical issues in nursing. These focus on questions relating to the nature of nursing and to the phenomena of key relevance to it. For example, any understanding of what nursing is presupposes some conception of just what nurses are trying to do when they nurse. But what are the ends of nursing? Are they to promote health, prevent disease, promote well-being, enhance autonomy, relieve suffering, or some combination of these? How are these ends are to be met? What kind of knowledge is needed in order to nurse? Practical, theoretical, aesthetic, moral, political, ''intuitive'' or some other? Papers that explore other aspects of philosophical enquiry and analysis of relevance to nursing (and any other healthcare or social care activity) are also welcome and might include, but not be limited to, critical discussions of the work of nurse theorists who have advanced philosophical claims (e.g., Benner, Benner and Wrubel, Carper, Schrok, Watson, Parse and so on) as well as critical engagement with philosophers (e.g., Heidegger, Husserl, Kuhn, Polanyi, Taylor, MacIntyre and so on) whose work informs health care in general and nursing in particular.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书