{"title":"Nursing's Long History of Mutual Aid.","authors":"Sam Porter","doi":"10.1111/nup.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The doctrine of mutual aid and its application to nursing has recently enjoyed considerable attention in the pages of Nursing Philosophy. However, this is not the first time that nursing theorists have identified its salience to nursing. In 1907, Adelaide Nutting and Lavinia Dock specified mutual aid as the evolutionary impulse upon which the activity of nursing is founded. Nutting and Dock adopted mutual aid from Peter Kropotkin's application of Russian evolutionary theory to anarchism. Russian natural scientists argued that Darwin had overemphasised struggle and under-emphasised cooperation in his theory of natural selection. Just as Kropotkin sought to uncover the mundane relations of mutual support that were the bedrock of species' success, Nutting and Dock aimed to bring to light the unsung history of nursing's crucial contribution to humanity through its enactment of mutual aid in healthcare. They took a gendered approach, which assumed that the ability to engage in mutual aid was a function of the capacity to care which, in turn, was more developed in women. They also took a reformist approach in contrast to their anarchist contemporaries, who advocated revolution. After addressing contemporary dilemmas about the purpose and possibility of mutual aid, the articulation of Nutting and Dock's feminism with difference and neo-Darwinian feminisms are noted. In examining the relationship of their approach with contemporary ecological theory, Nutting and Dock's evolutionary grounding for mutual aid is compared favourably with contemporary anarchism's exclusively political approach, though both are excessively human-centred. It is concluded that the most important message we can take from Nutting and Dock is that survival depends on mutual aid and that nurses have the potential to be key actors in its instantiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":"27 4","pages":"e70127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13682686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.70127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The doctrine of mutual aid and its application to nursing has recently enjoyed considerable attention in the pages of Nursing Philosophy. However, this is not the first time that nursing theorists have identified its salience to nursing. In 1907, Adelaide Nutting and Lavinia Dock specified mutual aid as the evolutionary impulse upon which the activity of nursing is founded. Nutting and Dock adopted mutual aid from Peter Kropotkin's application of Russian evolutionary theory to anarchism. Russian natural scientists argued that Darwin had overemphasised struggle and under-emphasised cooperation in his theory of natural selection. Just as Kropotkin sought to uncover the mundane relations of mutual support that were the bedrock of species' success, Nutting and Dock aimed to bring to light the unsung history of nursing's crucial contribution to humanity through its enactment of mutual aid in healthcare. They took a gendered approach, which assumed that the ability to engage in mutual aid was a function of the capacity to care which, in turn, was more developed in women. They also took a reformist approach in contrast to their anarchist contemporaries, who advocated revolution. After addressing contemporary dilemmas about the purpose and possibility of mutual aid, the articulation of Nutting and Dock's feminism with difference and neo-Darwinian feminisms are noted. In examining the relationship of their approach with contemporary ecological theory, Nutting and Dock's evolutionary grounding for mutual aid is compared favourably with contemporary anarchism's exclusively political approach, though both are excessively human-centred. It is concluded that the most important message we can take from Nutting and Dock is that survival depends on mutual aid and that nurses have the potential to be key actors in its instantiation.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Philosophy provides a forum for discussion of philosophical issues in nursing. These focus on questions relating to the nature of nursing and to the phenomena of key relevance to it. For example, any understanding of what nursing is presupposes some conception of just what nurses are trying to do when they nurse. But what are the ends of nursing? Are they to promote health, prevent disease, promote well-being, enhance autonomy, relieve suffering, or some combination of these? How are these ends are to be met? What kind of knowledge is needed in order to nurse? Practical, theoretical, aesthetic, moral, political, ''intuitive'' or some other?
Papers that explore other aspects of philosophical enquiry and analysis of relevance to nursing (and any other healthcare or social care activity) are also welcome and might include, but not be limited to, critical discussions of the work of nurse theorists who have advanced philosophical claims (e.g., Benner, Benner and Wrubel, Carper, Schrok, Watson, Parse and so on) as well as critical engagement with philosophers (e.g., Heidegger, Husserl, Kuhn, Polanyi, Taylor, MacIntyre and so on) whose work informs health care in general and nursing in particular.