A systematic review and meta-analysis of multi-health behavior interventions to reduce common mental health symptoms in people living with and beyond cancer.
Vagner Deuel de O Tavares, Felipe B Schuch, Gary Skinner, Thea Baker, Madeleine France-Ratcliffe, Geovan Menezes de Sousa, May Lynn Quan, Colleen Cuthbert, Megan Teychenne
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of multi-health behavior interventions to reduce common mental health symptoms in people living with and beyond cancer.","authors":"Vagner Deuel de O Tavares, Felipe B Schuch, Gary Skinner, Thea Baker, Madeleine France-Ratcliffe, Geovan Menezes de Sousa, May Lynn Quan, Colleen Cuthbert, Megan Teychenne","doi":"10.1080/07347332.2026.2747658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People living with and beyond cancer often report lower levels of physical activity, poorer sleep, and poorer diet quality, all of which may contribute to an increased risk of common mental health symptoms. This systematic review aimed to investigate the effects of multi-health behavior interventions designed to reduce common mental health symptoms in people living with and beyond cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analyses followed PRISMA guidelines. The search, conducted up to July 2, 2025, included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PsyAPA, and grey literature. Multi-health behavior interventions (randomized and non-randomized trials) for people living with and beyond cancer, that targeted at least two behaviors (physical activity, diet, sleep, mindfulness) and assessed effects on common mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, stress) were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 studies (<i>n</i> = 2,191 participants, 77.5% female; mean age 55 years) were included. Multi-health behavior interventions demonstrated small but significant improvements in depression (<i>g</i> = 0.40, 95% CI [0.26,0.55], <i>p</i> < 0.001), anxiety (<i>g</i> = 0.33, 95% CI [0.22,0.45], <i>p</i> < 0.001), and stress (<i>g</i> = 0.26, 95% CI [0.09,0.43], <i>p</i> = 0.003). Effects were consistent across treatment phases, cancer types, intervention type (flexible interventions and structured programs), number of intervention components, and intervention duration, with all subgroups showing significant improvements in at least one mental health outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multi-health behavior interventions are associated with small but significant improvements in common mental health symptoms among people living with and beyond cancer. However, given the limitations and variable certainty of the available evidence, further high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2026.2747658","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: People living with and beyond cancer often report lower levels of physical activity, poorer sleep, and poorer diet quality, all of which may contribute to an increased risk of common mental health symptoms. This systematic review aimed to investigate the effects of multi-health behavior interventions designed to reduce common mental health symptoms in people living with and beyond cancer.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analyses followed PRISMA guidelines. The search, conducted up to July 2, 2025, included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PsyAPA, and grey literature. Multi-health behavior interventions (randomized and non-randomized trials) for people living with and beyond cancer, that targeted at least two behaviors (physical activity, diet, sleep, mindfulness) and assessed effects on common mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, stress) were included.
Results: A total of 22 studies (n = 2,191 participants, 77.5% female; mean age 55 years) were included. Multi-health behavior interventions demonstrated small but significant improvements in depression (g = 0.40, 95% CI [0.26,0.55], p < 0.001), anxiety (g = 0.33, 95% CI [0.22,0.45], p < 0.001), and stress (g = 0.26, 95% CI [0.09,0.43], p = 0.003). Effects were consistent across treatment phases, cancer types, intervention type (flexible interventions and structured programs), number of intervention components, and intervention duration, with all subgroups showing significant improvements in at least one mental health outcome.
Conclusion: Multi-health behavior interventions are associated with small but significant improvements in common mental health symptoms among people living with and beyond cancer. However, given the limitations and variable certainty of the available evidence, further high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.
背景:癌症患者和非癌症患者经常报告身体活动水平较低,睡眠较差,饮食质量较差,所有这些都可能导致常见心理健康症状的风险增加。本系统综述旨在调查旨在减少癌症患者和癌症患者常见心理健康症状的多种健康行为干预措施的效果。方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南。该检索持续到2025年7月2日,包括PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、PsycInfo和PsyAPA,以及灰色文献。针对癌症患者和非癌症患者的多重健康行为干预(随机和非随机试验),针对至少两种行为(体育活动、饮食、睡眠、正念),并评估对常见心理健康结果(抑郁、焦虑、压力)的影响。结果:共纳入22项研究(n = 2191名受试者,77.5%为女性,平均年龄55岁)。多种健康行为干预对抑郁症有微小但显著的改善(g = 0.40, 95% CI [0.26,0.55], p g = 0.33, 95% CI [0.22,0.45], p g = 0.26, 95% CI [0.09,0.43], p = 0.003)。在治疗阶段、癌症类型、干预类型(灵活干预和结构化方案)、干预组成部分的数量和干预持续时间中,效果是一致的,所有亚组都至少在一项心理健康结果上显示出显著改善。结论:多种健康行为干预与癌症患者和癌症患者常见心理健康症状的微小但显著改善有关。然而,鉴于现有证据的局限性和可变确定性,需要进一步的高质量随机对照试验来证实这些发现。
期刊介绍:
Here is your single source of integrated information on providing the best psychosocial care possible from the knowledge available from many disciplines.The Journal of Psychosocial Oncology is an essential source for up-to-date clinical and research material geared toward health professionals who provide psychosocial services to cancer patients, their families, and their caregivers. The journal—the first interdisciplinary resource of its kind—is in its third decade of examining exploratory and hypothesis testing and presenting program evaluation research on critical areas, including: the stigma of cancer; employment and personal problems facing cancer patients; patient education.