Field-based evaluation of hand-arm vibration (HAV) and heat exposure among grounds maintenance workers in the southeastern United States: a pilot study.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Seunghyeon Yang, Nathan Chen, Claudiu T Lungu, Jonghwa Oh
{"title":"Field-based evaluation of hand-arm vibration (HAV) and heat exposure among grounds maintenance workers in the southeastern United States: a pilot study.","authors":"Seunghyeon Yang, Nathan Chen, Claudiu T Lungu, Jonghwa Oh","doi":"10.1186/s12995-026-00523-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate simultaneous exposure to hand-arm vibration (HAV) and heat among grounds maintenance workers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ten groundskeepers employed at a southern US institution were recruited. Individual workers' exposure to HAV and heat was monitored during their regular work shift for three days. HAV exposure was measured using tri-axial vibration dosimeters worn on both hands of the participants to obtain daily vibration exposure (A(8)) and vibration total value (a<sub>hv</sub>) for each power tool used. Daily HAV exposure dose was determined using a<sub>hv</sub> for all tools used and corresponding tool operation duration. Lifetime cumulative HAV exposure dose (a<sub>hv-lifetime</sub>) was determined based on a<sub>hv</sub> for all tools used and exposure history obtained from a questionnaire. Personal heat exposure was evaluated using a wearable device to collect estimated core body temperature (CBT). Environmental heat metrics, including heat index (HI) and wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT), were determined using a WBGT monitor. Environmental parameters, including ambient temperature, relative humidity, and solar radiation, were also measured using a portable weather station.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean A(8) values of the ten individual workers ranged from 0.8 to 3.3 m/s<sup>2</sup> for the right hand and 0.7 to 2.9 m/s<sup>2</sup> for the left hand. Tool-specific mean a<sub>hv</sub> ranged from 2.3 to 4.8 m/s<sup>2</sup> for the right hand and 2.6 to 6.2 m/s<sup>2</sup> for the left hand. The daily HAV exposure dose ranged from 6.2 to 23.7 m/s<sup>2</sup> for the right hand and from 4.6 to 23.4 m/s<sup>2</sup> for the left hand. The a<sub>hv-lifetime</sub> range was 1,128.5 to 172,333.0 and 1,102.4 to 161,462.6 h∙m/s<sup>2</sup> for the right and left hands, respectively. The daily mean of estimated CBT of the individual workers ranged from 36.7 to 39.1 °C. The daily mean HI and WBGT values were from 20.7 to 48.9 °C and from 17.5 to 37.5 °C, respectively. The average ambient temperature, relative humidity, and solar radiation were 30.3 ± 4.1 °C, 59.9 ± 14.5%, and 217.8 ± 248.5 W/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One groundskeeper's three-day average A(8) exceeded the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) action limit (AL) of 2.5 m/s<sup>2</sup>. During the three-day full-time shift, 19.0% of total work hours exceeded the upper normal CBT range of 38 °C, and 66.0 and 65.4% of total work hours were at or above the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)'s proposed high heat trigger for HI (32.2 °C) and WBGT (26.7 °C for heavy workload), respectively. These findings indicate that continuous monitoring for heat strain is needed for outdoor workers whose jobs require a high workload especially under the southeastern US summer climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":48903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13685117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-026-00523-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate simultaneous exposure to hand-arm vibration (HAV) and heat among grounds maintenance workers.

Method: Ten groundskeepers employed at a southern US institution were recruited. Individual workers' exposure to HAV and heat was monitored during their regular work shift for three days. HAV exposure was measured using tri-axial vibration dosimeters worn on both hands of the participants to obtain daily vibration exposure (A(8)) and vibration total value (ahv) for each power tool used. Daily HAV exposure dose was determined using ahv for all tools used and corresponding tool operation duration. Lifetime cumulative HAV exposure dose (ahv-lifetime) was determined based on ahv for all tools used and exposure history obtained from a questionnaire. Personal heat exposure was evaluated using a wearable device to collect estimated core body temperature (CBT). Environmental heat metrics, including heat index (HI) and wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT), were determined using a WBGT monitor. Environmental parameters, including ambient temperature, relative humidity, and solar radiation, were also measured using a portable weather station.

Results: Mean A(8) values of the ten individual workers ranged from 0.8 to 3.3 m/s2 for the right hand and 0.7 to 2.9 m/s2 for the left hand. Tool-specific mean ahv ranged from 2.3 to 4.8 m/s2 for the right hand and 2.6 to 6.2 m/s2 for the left hand. The daily HAV exposure dose ranged from 6.2 to 23.7 m/s2 for the right hand and from 4.6 to 23.4 m/s2 for the left hand. The ahv-lifetime range was 1,128.5 to 172,333.0 and 1,102.4 to 161,462.6 h∙m/s2 for the right and left hands, respectively. The daily mean of estimated CBT of the individual workers ranged from 36.7 to 39.1 °C. The daily mean HI and WBGT values were from 20.7 to 48.9 °C and from 17.5 to 37.5 °C, respectively. The average ambient temperature, relative humidity, and solar radiation were 30.3 ± 4.1 °C, 59.9 ± 14.5%, and 217.8 ± 248.5 W/m2, respectively.

Conclusion: One groundskeeper's three-day average A(8) exceeded the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) action limit (AL) of 2.5 m/s2. During the three-day full-time shift, 19.0% of total work hours exceeded the upper normal CBT range of 38 °C, and 66.0 and 65.4% of total work hours were at or above the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)'s proposed high heat trigger for HI (32.2 °C) and WBGT (26.7 °C for heavy workload), respectively. These findings indicate that continuous monitoring for heat strain is needed for outdoor workers whose jobs require a high workload especially under the southeastern US summer climate.

美国东南部地面维修工人的手臂振动(HAV)和热暴露的现场评估:一项试点研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Aimed at clinicians and researchers, the Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology is a multi-disciplinary, open access journal which publishes original research on the clinical and scientific aspects of occupational and environmental health. With high-quality peer review and quick decision times, we welcome submissions on the diagnosis, prevention, management, and scientific analysis of occupational diseases, injuries, and disability. The journal also covers the promotion of health of workers, their families, and communities, and ranges from rehabilitation to tropical medicine and public health aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书