Occupational injury patterns in a hospital-based cross-sectional study in Türkiye: sectoral characteristics, injury profiles, and determinants of multiple injuries (2019-2023).

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Halit Canberk Aydogan, Zeynep Unat Öztürk, Hacer Yaşar Teke
{"title":"Occupational injury patterns in a hospital-based cross-sectional study in Türkiye: sectoral characteristics, injury profiles, and determinants of multiple injuries (2019-2023).","authors":"Halit Canberk Aydogan, Zeynep Unat Öztürk, Hacer Yaşar Teke","doi":"10.1186/s13690-026-02121-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational accidents remain a major public health and economic burden, particularly in middle-income countries. While healthcare workers and high-energy industrial sectors are often examined separately, hospital-based injury data derived from forensic medical records provide a structured opportunity to compare sector-specific injury patterns within a unified analytical framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective hospital-based cross-sectional study included all occupational injury cases presenting to a tertiary emergency department and systematically documented through forensic medical records between 2019 and 2023 (n = 402). Sociodemographic characteristics, sector, accident mechanism, injury location, and injury count were analysed. Associations were assessed using chi square tests and Cramérs V. Independent predictors of multiple injuries were examined using binary logistic regression, and sector- and mechanism-specific within-sample relative risks were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population was predominantly male (66.9%) and young (45.5% aged 18-29 years). Construction, healthcare, and logistics were the most represented sectors. Physical trauma accounted for 95.3% of cases, while infectious exposure risk was identified in 21.4%, mainly from needlestick injuries and body-fluid splashes in healthcare. Multiple injuries occurred in 35.8% of cases and were disproportionately concentrated in high-energy sectors, including electrical-mechanical work (OR = 44.43; 95% CI = 3.72-531.12), manufacturing (OR = 12.82; 95% CI = 2.91-56.50), construction (OR = 4.64; 95% CI = 1.58-13.62), and logistics. Traffic incidents and falls were the strongest contributors to multi-region trauma. Upper-extremity injuries, particularly hand and finger trauma, predominated in healthcare workers, mainly nurses and healthcare technicians, and were more frequent among females.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among workers presenting to a single tertiary hospital, injury patterns differed by sector, with infectious exposure predominating in healthcare and high-energy mechanisms in industrial sectors. These within-sample patterns identify potential targets for sector-specific prevention; however, without workforce denominators, they do not establish which sectors or age groups carry the highest injury risk, and broader prioritization requires population-level evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13685222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-026-02121-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Occupational accidents remain a major public health and economic burden, particularly in middle-income countries. While healthcare workers and high-energy industrial sectors are often examined separately, hospital-based injury data derived from forensic medical records provide a structured opportunity to compare sector-specific injury patterns within a unified analytical framework.

Methods: This retrospective hospital-based cross-sectional study included all occupational injury cases presenting to a tertiary emergency department and systematically documented through forensic medical records between 2019 and 2023 (n = 402). Sociodemographic characteristics, sector, accident mechanism, injury location, and injury count were analysed. Associations were assessed using chi square tests and Cramérs V. Independent predictors of multiple injuries were examined using binary logistic regression, and sector- and mechanism-specific within-sample relative risks were calculated.

Results: The study population was predominantly male (66.9%) and young (45.5% aged 18-29 years). Construction, healthcare, and logistics were the most represented sectors. Physical trauma accounted for 95.3% of cases, while infectious exposure risk was identified in 21.4%, mainly from needlestick injuries and body-fluid splashes in healthcare. Multiple injuries occurred in 35.8% of cases and were disproportionately concentrated in high-energy sectors, including electrical-mechanical work (OR = 44.43; 95% CI = 3.72-531.12), manufacturing (OR = 12.82; 95% CI = 2.91-56.50), construction (OR = 4.64; 95% CI = 1.58-13.62), and logistics. Traffic incidents and falls were the strongest contributors to multi-region trauma. Upper-extremity injuries, particularly hand and finger trauma, predominated in healthcare workers, mainly nurses and healthcare technicians, and were more frequent among females.

Conclusions: Among workers presenting to a single tertiary hospital, injury patterns differed by sector, with infectious exposure predominating in healthcare and high-energy mechanisms in industrial sectors. These within-sample patterns identify potential targets for sector-specific prevention; however, without workforce denominators, they do not establish which sectors or age groups carry the highest injury risk, and broader prioritization requires population-level evidence.

基于医院的横断面研究中的职业伤害模式:部门特征、伤害概况和多重伤害的决定因素(2019-2023)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书