[Translated article] Accuracy of the Akmese sign as a diagnostic method for posterior root tears of the medial meniscus in Peruvian healthcare facilities.

Q3 Medicine
Stefany M Paucar-Vergara, Joseph S Urdanivia-Martos, Carlos J Toro-Huamanchumo
{"title":"[Translated article] Accuracy of the Akmese sign as a diagnostic method for posterior root tears of the medial meniscus in Peruvian healthcare facilities.","authors":"Stefany M Paucar-Vergara, Joseph S Urdanivia-Martos, Carlos J Toro-Huamanchumo","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2026.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Medial meniscus injuries are the most prevalent knee injuries, frequently causing pain, instability, and orthopaedic surgeries. Although several clinical tests are used for meniscal pathology, most were developed for general meniscal lesions rather than specifically for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). Evidence on root-specific physical examination signs remains limited. Recently, the Akmese manoeuvre has been introduced as a non-invasive diagnostic tool, assessing pain or tenderness during physical examination. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the Akmese sign for the clinical diagnosis of MMPRT. Methods This prospective cohort diagnostic study included patients aged 18-55 years scheduled for arthroscopic surgery following a clinical diagnosis of medial meniscus injury between January 2022 and July 2023. Diagnostic performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and likelihood ratios (LR+, LR-), were calculated, using arthroscopy as the reference standard. The interobserver reliability of the Akmese manoeuvre was assessed using the kappa coefficient. Results A total of 201 individuals met the eligibility criteria, with a mean age of 38.4 ± 9.8 years. The Akmese sign was positive in 26 patients, and MMPRT was confirmed by arthroscopy in 28 patients. The Akmese sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 98.8%, PPV of 92.3%, NPV of 97.7%, LR+ of 74.1, and a LR- of 0.15. Conclusion In this selected surgical population, the Akmese manoeuvre showed promising diagnostic performance and very good interobserver reliability for identifying MMPRT. The sign may be useful as an adjunctive clinical tool to support preoperative suspicion, targeted MRI review, and surgical planning, but it should not be considered a replacement for MRI or arthroscopic assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2026.10.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Medial meniscus injuries are the most prevalent knee injuries, frequently causing pain, instability, and orthopaedic surgeries. Although several clinical tests are used for meniscal pathology, most were developed for general meniscal lesions rather than specifically for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). Evidence on root-specific physical examination signs remains limited. Recently, the Akmese manoeuvre has been introduced as a non-invasive diagnostic tool, assessing pain or tenderness during physical examination. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the Akmese sign for the clinical diagnosis of MMPRT. Methods This prospective cohort diagnostic study included patients aged 18-55 years scheduled for arthroscopic surgery following a clinical diagnosis of medial meniscus injury between January 2022 and July 2023. Diagnostic performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and likelihood ratios (LR+, LR-), were calculated, using arthroscopy as the reference standard. The interobserver reliability of the Akmese manoeuvre was assessed using the kappa coefficient. Results A total of 201 individuals met the eligibility criteria, with a mean age of 38.4 ± 9.8 years. The Akmese sign was positive in 26 patients, and MMPRT was confirmed by arthroscopy in 28 patients. The Akmese sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 98.8%, PPV of 92.3%, NPV of 97.7%, LR+ of 74.1, and a LR- of 0.15. Conclusion In this selected surgical population, the Akmese manoeuvre showed promising diagnostic performance and very good interobserver reliability for identifying MMPRT. The sign may be useful as an adjunctive clinical tool to support preoperative suspicion, targeted MRI review, and surgical planning, but it should not be considered a replacement for MRI or arthroscopic assessment.

【翻译文章】在秘鲁医疗机构中,Akmese征作为内侧半月板后根撕裂诊断方法的准确性。
背景:内侧半月板损伤是最常见的膝关节损伤,常引起疼痛、不稳定和骨科手术。虽然有几种临床检查用于半月板病理,但大多数是针对一般半月板病变而不是专门针对内侧半月板后根撕裂(MMPRT)。关于根特异性体检征象的证据仍然有限。最近,Akmese手法已被引入作为一种非侵入性诊断工具,用于评估身体检查时的疼痛或压痛。本研究旨在确定Akmese征象对MMPRT临床诊断的准确性。该前瞻性队列诊断研究纳入了2022年1月至2023年7月期间临床诊断为内侧半月板损伤并计划进行关节镜手术的18-55岁患者。以关节镜检查作为参考标准,计算诊断性能指标,包括敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值(PPV、NPV)和似然比(LR+、LR-)。使用kappa系数评估Akmese机动的观察者间信度。结果201例患者符合入选标准,平均年龄38.4±9.8岁。26例患者的Akmese征呈阳性,28例患者的关节镜检查证实了MMPRT。Akmese征候的敏感性为85.7%,特异性为98.8%,PPV为92.3%,NPV为97.7%,LR+为74.1,LR-为0.15。结论:在这一选定的手术人群中,Akmese手术在诊断MMPRT方面表现出良好的诊断性能和非常好的观察者间可靠性。该征象可作为辅助临床工具,支持术前怀疑、有针对性的MRI检查和手术计划,但不应视为MRI或关节镜评估的替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书