Mechanistic Role of Layer 5-to-2/3 Recurrent Feedback in TMS-Evoked Motor Potentials.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Somayeh Mahmouie, Mehrdad Saviz, Golnaz Baghdadi, Farzad Towhidkhah
{"title":"Mechanistic Role of Layer 5-to-2/3 Recurrent Feedback in TMS-Evoked Motor Potentials.","authors":"Somayeh Mahmouie, Mehrdad Saviz, Golnaz Baghdadi, Farzad Towhidkhah","doi":"10.1007/s12021-026-09818-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective We aimed to develop and validate a personalized neural field theory (NFT) model of the motor cortex incorporating recurrent connections from layer 5 to layers 2/3. Methods We extended the established feedforward model of Wilson et al. (2021) by adding recurrent feedback connections. Synaptic coupling coefficients were derived using a bottom-up approach from microanatomical data and calibrated via Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) against experimental input-output (IO) curves. The model was then personalized for individuals by optimizing three recurrent weighted gains ([Formula: see text]). We simulated single-pulse IO curves, paired-pulse protocols (SICI, ICF, LICI), and responses to intermittent and continuous theta-burst stimulation (iTBS/cTBS). Results The model revealed a sigmoidal, non-linear relationship between TMS intensity and neuronal input, in contrast to previous linear assumptions. Recurrent weighted inhibitory gain ([Formula: see text]) was critical for generating realistic short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI). Also, this parameter was the dominant parameter for personalization, successfully fitting 13/18 iTBS and 15/18 cTBS individual response profiles. The model demonstrated that SICI/ICF and LICI emerge from protocol-specific tuning of the same recurrent microcircuit, with LICI requiring a greater suppression of recurrent excitation consistent with GABAB mediation. Our model showed superior generalizability, achieving robust fits on an independent cTBS dataset not used for initial calibration. Conclusion We present a unified, mechanistically interpretable NFT model identifying inhibitory feedback as a primary regulator of TMS dynamics and inter-individual variability. Significance This work advances the Wilson (2021) model by providing a biologically grounded framework that links clinical TMS metrics to specific cortical circuits, offering a powerful tool for optimizing personalized neuromodulation therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49761,"journal":{"name":"Neuroinformatics","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-026-09818-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective We aimed to develop and validate a personalized neural field theory (NFT) model of the motor cortex incorporating recurrent connections from layer 5 to layers 2/3. Methods We extended the established feedforward model of Wilson et al. (2021) by adding recurrent feedback connections. Synaptic coupling coefficients were derived using a bottom-up approach from microanatomical data and calibrated via Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) against experimental input-output (IO) curves. The model was then personalized for individuals by optimizing three recurrent weighted gains ([Formula: see text]). We simulated single-pulse IO curves, paired-pulse protocols (SICI, ICF, LICI), and responses to intermittent and continuous theta-burst stimulation (iTBS/cTBS). Results The model revealed a sigmoidal, non-linear relationship between TMS intensity and neuronal input, in contrast to previous linear assumptions. Recurrent weighted inhibitory gain ([Formula: see text]) was critical for generating realistic short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI). Also, this parameter was the dominant parameter for personalization, successfully fitting 13/18 iTBS and 15/18 cTBS individual response profiles. The model demonstrated that SICI/ICF and LICI emerge from protocol-specific tuning of the same recurrent microcircuit, with LICI requiring a greater suppression of recurrent excitation consistent with GABAB mediation. Our model showed superior generalizability, achieving robust fits on an independent cTBS dataset not used for initial calibration. Conclusion We present a unified, mechanistically interpretable NFT model identifying inhibitory feedback as a primary regulator of TMS dynamics and inter-individual variability. Significance This work advances the Wilson (2021) model by providing a biologically grounded framework that links clinical TMS metrics to specific cortical circuits, offering a powerful tool for optimizing personalized neuromodulation therapies.

5- 2/3层反复反馈在tms诱发运动电位中的机制作用。
目的建立并验证一种包含从第5层到第2/3层循环连接的运动皮层个性化神经场理论(NFT)模型。我们通过添加循环反馈连接扩展了Wilson等人(2021)建立的前馈模型。突触耦合系数采用自底向上的方法从微观解剖数据中导出,并通过粒子群优化(PSO)根据实验输入输出(IO)曲线进行校准。然后,通过优化三个循环加权增益(公式:见文本),将模型个性化。我们模拟了单脉冲IO曲线、配对脉冲协议(SICI、ICF、LICI)以及对间歇性和连续脉冲刺激(iTBS/cTBS)的反应。结果该模型揭示了经颅磁刺激强度与神经元输入之间的s形非线性关系,而不是之前的线性假设。反复加权抑制增益(公式:见文本)对于产生真实的短间隔皮质内抑制(SICI)至关重要。此外,该参数是个性化的主要参数,成功拟合了13/18 iTBS和15/18 cTBS的个体反应概况。该模型表明,SICI/ICF和LICI来自于同一循环微电路的协议特定调谐,LICI需要更大的抑制循环激发,与GABAB调解一致。我们的模型显示出优越的泛化性,在不用于初始校准的独立cTBS数据集上实现了鲁棒拟合。我们提出了一个统一的、机制上可解释的NFT模型,该模型确定了抑制性反馈是TMS动态和个体间变异性的主要调节因子。这项工作通过提供将临床经颅磁刺激指标与特定皮层回路联系起来的生物学基础框架,推进了Wilson(2021)模型,为优化个性化神经调节疗法提供了强大的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroinformatics
Neuroinformatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Neuroinformatics publishes original articles and reviews with an emphasis on data structure and software tools related to analysis, modeling, integration, and sharing in all areas of neuroscience research. The editors particularly invite contributions on: (1) Theory and methodology, including discussions on ontologies, modeling approaches, database design, and meta-analyses; (2) Descriptions of developed databases and software tools, and of the methods for their distribution; (3) Relevant experimental results, such as reports accompanie by the release of massive data sets; (4) Computational simulations of models integrating and organizing complex data; and (5) Neuroengineering approaches, including hardware, robotics, and information theory studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书