[Translated article] Coronal and rotational femoral anatomy in a Spanish cohort: Anatomical description and surgical implications for total knee arthroplasty.

Q3 Medicine
Oriol Pujol, Pedro Hinarejos, Albert Pons, Ernest Famada, Angela Zumel, Matías Novillo, Juan Erquicia, Joan Leal-Blanquet
{"title":"[Translated article] Coronal and rotational femoral anatomy in a Spanish cohort: Anatomical description and surgical implications for total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Oriol Pujol, Pedro Hinarejos, Albert Pons, Ernest Famada, Angela Zumel, Matías Novillo, Juan Erquicia, Joan Leal-Blanquet","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2026.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose The primary objective is to analyse the distribution of three femoral anatomical parameters in a Spanish osteoarthritic population using CT-based measurements: (1) anatomical-mechanical axis (AA-MA), (2) posterior condylar-transepicondylar axis (PCA-TEA) and (3) lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA). The secondary objective is to assess the surgical relevance of these findings in TKA. Methods It is a multicentric cross-sectional observational study. Preoperative CT-scans of 318 patients from a Spanish cohort were analysed to determine AA-MA, PCA-TEA and LDFA. Then, femoral implant positioning was simulated as 5° of valgus from the AA and 3° of external rotation from the PCA. For each patient, this simulated positioning was compared to the theoretical mechanical alignment target. Finally, the native femoral JLO (LDFA) of each patient was compared to the mechanical alignment target (90°). Results Mean AA-MA relationship was 6.0° ± 0.9°, mean PCA-TEA angle was 3.1° ± 1.8° and mean native LDFA was 87.3° ± 2.9°. Positioning the femoral component systematically at 5° of valgus from the AA and 3° of external rotation from the PCA would result in 74.7% of implants being placed in varus and 46.1% in internal rotation from the TEA. Moreover, mechanically alignment would produce a more varus femoral JLO than the native LDFA in 78.1% of patients. Conclusions There is considerable variability in femoral anatomy within the osteoarthritic Spanish population. The 6.7% of patients had AA-MA values outside the 5-7° range. The 41.8% of patients showed PCA-TEA angles smaller than 2° or greater than 4°. The 30.6% of LDFA were outside the 85-90° interval. Simulating a femoral component positioned using only AA and PCA references was associated with deviations from the intended mechanical alignment, most commonly resulting in varus deviation and internal rotation from the TEA.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2026.10.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The primary objective is to analyse the distribution of three femoral anatomical parameters in a Spanish osteoarthritic population using CT-based measurements: (1) anatomical-mechanical axis (AA-MA), (2) posterior condylar-transepicondylar axis (PCA-TEA) and (3) lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA). The secondary objective is to assess the surgical relevance of these findings in TKA. Methods It is a multicentric cross-sectional observational study. Preoperative CT-scans of 318 patients from a Spanish cohort were analysed to determine AA-MA, PCA-TEA and LDFA. Then, femoral implant positioning was simulated as 5° of valgus from the AA and 3° of external rotation from the PCA. For each patient, this simulated positioning was compared to the theoretical mechanical alignment target. Finally, the native femoral JLO (LDFA) of each patient was compared to the mechanical alignment target (90°). Results Mean AA-MA relationship was 6.0° ± 0.9°, mean PCA-TEA angle was 3.1° ± 1.8° and mean native LDFA was 87.3° ± 2.9°. Positioning the femoral component systematically at 5° of valgus from the AA and 3° of external rotation from the PCA would result in 74.7% of implants being placed in varus and 46.1% in internal rotation from the TEA. Moreover, mechanically alignment would produce a more varus femoral JLO than the native LDFA in 78.1% of patients. Conclusions There is considerable variability in femoral anatomy within the osteoarthritic Spanish population. The 6.7% of patients had AA-MA values outside the 5-7° range. The 41.8% of patients showed PCA-TEA angles smaller than 2° or greater than 4°. The 30.6% of LDFA were outside the 85-90° interval. Simulating a femoral component positioned using only AA and PCA references was associated with deviations from the intended mechanical alignment, most commonly resulting in varus deviation and internal rotation from the TEA.

【翻译文章】西班牙队列的冠状和旋转股骨解剖:全膝关节置换术的解剖描述和手术意义。
主要目的是利用基于ct的测量分析西班牙骨关节炎人群中三个股骨解剖参数的分布:(1)解剖-机械轴(AA-MA),(2)后髁-经髁轴(PCA-TEA)和(3)股骨外侧远端角(LDFA)。次要目的是评估TKA中这些发现的外科相关性。方法采用多中心横断面观察性研究。对来自西班牙队列的318例患者的术前ct扫描进行分析,以确定AA-MA, PCA-TEA和LDFA。然后,模拟股骨假体定位为从AA向外翻5°,从PCA向外旋转3°。对于每个患者,将模拟定位与理论机械对准目标进行比较。最后,将每位患者的天然股骨JLO (LDFA)与机械对准目标(90°)进行比较。结果AA-MA平均关系为6.0°±0.9°,PCA-TEA平均角为3.1°±1.8°,天然LDFA平均角为87.3°±2.9°。将股骨假体系统地定位在距AA外翻5°,距PCA外旋3°的位置,将导致74.7%的假体内翻,46.1%的假体距TEA内旋。此外,在78.1%的患者中,机械对齐会比天然LDFA产生更多的股骨JLO内翻。结论西班牙骨关节炎患者的股骨解剖结构存在相当大的差异。6.7%的患者AA-MA值在5-7°范围之外。41.8%的患者PCA-TEA角度小于2°或大于4°。30.6%的LDFA位于85 ~ 90°段外。仅使用AA和PCA参考来模拟股骨假体定位与偏离预期的机械对准有关,最常见的是导致内翻偏差和TEA的内旋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书