Adopting Global Lung Function Initiative Reference Equations Alters Pulmonary Function Testing Interpretation in a Safety-Net Cohort.

Q3 Medicine
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2026-08-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2174/0118743064497297260820041654
Stephen T Russell, Jenny E Han, Jordan A Kempker, Eric Honig, Abiodun T Kukoyi
{"title":"Adopting Global Lung Function Initiative Reference Equations Alters Pulmonary Function Testing Interpretation in a Safety-Net Cohort.","authors":"Stephen T Russell, Jenny E Han, Jordan A Kempker, Eric Honig, Abiodun T Kukoyi","doi":"10.2174/0118743064497297260820041654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objective: </strong>Current American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) guidelines recommend Global Lung Initiative (GLI) reference equations for spirometry, lung volumes, and diffusing capacity (DLCO). The impact of adopting these reference equations remains unclear and may differ by race.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study of Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT) performed at Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, GA, from 2017 to 2024. PFT components and interpretive patterns were analyzed using current Grady reference equations, then compared with GLI, including race-neutral spirometry, and stratified by race.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 7877 eligible patients; 7034 (89%) were Black, 529 (7%) were White, and 314 (4%) were Hispanic. Black patients had increased frequency of abnormal FEV1 (37.4% to 52.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), FVC (32.4% to 48.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), Total Lung Capacity (TLC) (6.7% to 40.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and DLCO (30.3% to 45.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). White and Hispanic patients had decreases in abnormal FEV1 (48.0% to 38.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001, and 29.0% to 20.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively), decreases in abnormal FVC (38.0% to 26.1%, <i>p</i>< 0.001, and 26.1% to 18.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), increases in abnormal TLC (12.7% to 17.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.001, and 12.4% to 16.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and no change in DLCO. 44.3% of Black, 16.8% of White, and 14.5% of Hispanic patients had a new interpretive pattern.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this health system with a predominantly Black patient population, transitioning our PFT reference equations to GLI increased detection of abnormalities and changed interpretive patterns, with greater effects in Black patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The health-system impact of implementing GLI reference equations is highly context-dependent, influenced by demographics and prior reference equations.</p>","PeriodicalId":39127,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","volume":"20 ","pages":"e18743064497297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13678695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118743064497297260820041654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/objective: Current American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) guidelines recommend Global Lung Initiative (GLI) reference equations for spirometry, lung volumes, and diffusing capacity (DLCO). The impact of adopting these reference equations remains unclear and may differ by race.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT) performed at Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, GA, from 2017 to 2024. PFT components and interpretive patterns were analyzed using current Grady reference equations, then compared with GLI, including race-neutral spirometry, and stratified by race.

Results: There were 7877 eligible patients; 7034 (89%) were Black, 529 (7%) were White, and 314 (4%) were Hispanic. Black patients had increased frequency of abnormal FEV1 (37.4% to 52.1%, p < 0.001), FVC (32.4% to 48.4%, p < 0.001), Total Lung Capacity (TLC) (6.7% to 40.8%, p < 0.001), and DLCO (30.3% to 45.3%, p < 0.001). White and Hispanic patients had decreases in abnormal FEV1 (48.0% to 38.0%, p < 0.001, and 29.0% to 20.7%, p < 0.001, respectively), decreases in abnormal FVC (38.0% to 26.1%, p< 0.001, and 26.1% to 18.2%, p < 0.001), increases in abnormal TLC (12.7% to 17.8%, p < 0.001, and 12.4% to 16.8%, p < 0.001) and no change in DLCO. 44.3% of Black, 16.8% of White, and 14.5% of Hispanic patients had a new interpretive pattern.

Discussion: In this health system with a predominantly Black patient population, transitioning our PFT reference equations to GLI increased detection of abnormalities and changed interpretive patterns, with greater effects in Black patients.

Conclusion: The health-system impact of implementing GLI reference equations is highly context-dependent, influenced by demographics and prior reference equations.

采用全球肺功能倡议参考方程改变了安全网队列中肺功能检测的解释。
简介/目的:当前美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会(ATS/ERS)指南推荐全球肺倡议(GLI)肺量测定、肺容量和弥散能力(DLCO)参考方程。采用这些参考方程的影响尚不清楚,可能因种族而异。方法:我们对2017年至2024年在乔治亚州亚特兰大格雷迪纪念医院进行的肺功能试验(PFT)进行了横断面研究。使用当前Grady参考方程分析PFT分量和解释模式,然后与GLI(包括种族中性肺活量测定)进行比较,并按种族分层。结果:入选患者7877例;7034例(89%)为黑人,529例(7%)为白人,314例(4%)为西班牙裔。黑人患者FEV1 (37.4% ~ 52.1%, p < 0.001)、FVC (32.4% ~ 48.4%, p < 0.001)、总肺活量(TLC) (6.7% ~ 40.8%, p < 0.001)和DLCO (30.3% ~ 45.3%, p < 0.001)异常频率增加。白人和西班牙裔患者异常FEV1减少(分别为48.0% ~ 38.0%,p< 0.001, 29.0% ~ 20.7%, p< 0.001),异常FVC减少(38.0% ~ 26.1%,p< 0.001, 26.1% ~ 18.2%, p< 0.001),异常TLC增加(12.7% ~ 17.8%,p< 0.001, 12.4% ~ 16.8%, p< 0.001), DLCO无变化。44.3%的黑人、16.8%的白人和14.5%的西班牙裔患者有新的解释模式。讨论:在这个以黑人患者为主的卫生系统中,将我们的PFT参考方程转换为GLI增加了对异常的检测并改变了解释模式,对黑人患者的影响更大。结论:实施GLI参考方程对卫生系统的影响高度依赖于环境,受人口统计学和先前参考方程的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues in all important areas of experimental and clinical research in respiratory medicine. Topics covered include: -COPD- Occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants- Asthma- Allergy- Non-invasive ventilation- Therapeutic intervention- Lung cancer- Lung infections respiratory diseases- Therapeutic interventions- Adult and paediatric medicine- Cell biology. The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal, a peer reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on important recent developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and making them freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书