Xing Peng, Yaowei Liang, Fan Wang, Xiang Wang, Rong Shi, Junjie Zhang
{"title":"How visual and auditory task loads differently impair the advantage of multimodal warnings.","authors":"Xing Peng, Yaowei Liang, Fan Wang, Xiang Wang, Rong Shi, Junjie Zhang","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2026.2751023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multimodal warnings elicit faster response times than unisensory warnings in cockpits. However, how visual and auditory task demands affect the detection of multimodal warnings remains unclear. This study recruited 30 pilots and 30 control participants to complete a warning response task and an aviation visual or auditory task. The race model inequality analysis indicated that the multisensory enhancement effect decreased as the load increased. The analysis of variance indicated an interaction effect among modality, load level, and task type on response times. Results suggested that demanding tasks may affect the detection of multimodal warnings more substantially than that of unisensory warnings within the same modality. The slowing of response times to multimodal warnings may be driven by the more load-sensitive sensory component. The findings were consistent across groups. This study provides practical implications for multimodal warning design and theoretical insights into multimodal processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2026.2751023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multimodal warnings elicit faster response times than unisensory warnings in cockpits. However, how visual and auditory task demands affect the detection of multimodal warnings remains unclear. This study recruited 30 pilots and 30 control participants to complete a warning response task and an aviation visual or auditory task. The race model inequality analysis indicated that the multisensory enhancement effect decreased as the load increased. The analysis of variance indicated an interaction effect among modality, load level, and task type on response times. Results suggested that demanding tasks may affect the detection of multimodal warnings more substantially than that of unisensory warnings within the same modality. The slowing of response times to multimodal warnings may be driven by the more load-sensitive sensory component. The findings were consistent across groups. This study provides practical implications for multimodal warning design and theoretical insights into multimodal processing.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.