Improving the Management of Patients' Own Medications in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Multidisciplinary Before-And-After Intervention Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2026-10-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S642041
Xiaoyan Chen, Lin Liu, Jie Zhang, Linghua Zheng, Xiaona Chen, Mingxia Zhang
{"title":"Improving the Management of Patients' Own Medications in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Multidisciplinary Before-And-After Intervention Study.","authors":"Xiaoyan Chen, Lin Liu, Jie Zhang, Linghua Zheng, Xiaona Chen, Mingxia Zhang","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S642041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients' own medications (POMs) may pose safety risks when their use is not integrated into hospital medication-management processes. This study evaluated a multidisciplinary intervention for POM management in hospitalized older adults.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This single-center before-and-after intervention study was conducted from March 2024 to February 2025. The intervention comprised five coordinated components: physician-led assessment, authorization, order entry, guidance, and monitoring; pharmacist-led verification, order review, and record maintenance; nurse-led verification, supervision, and education using color-coded labels (green, approved for use; red, not to be used; yellow, awaiting confirmation); IT-led integration of POM information into the electronic medication administration record; and procurement-led upgrades to storage equipment. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of POM-related medication errors per 1000 patient-days. Secondary outcomes were correct POM documentation within 24 hours of admission and correct POM storage at the pre-discharge assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 162 patients, with 81 in each period. Before the intervention, 174 POM-related medication errors occurred over 1628 patient-days (106.9 per 1000 patient-days), compared with 29 errors over 1581 patient-days after the intervention (18.3 per 1000 patient-days). The incidence rate ratio was 0.172 (95% CI, 0.116-0.254; P<0.001), representing an 82.8% reduction. Correct POM documentation within 24 hours increased from 53.1% (43/81) to 92.6% (75/81; <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=31.951, P<0.001; OR=11.047, 95% CI, 4.319-28.253; RR=1.744, 95% CI, 1.408-2.160). Correct POM storage at the pre-discharge assessment increased from 32.1% (26/81) to 84.0% (68/81; <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=44.707, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intervention was associated with improvements in all three measured POM outcomes at this center. Multicenter studies with longer follow-up are needed to assess generalizability and sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"20 ","pages":"642041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13679603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S642041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients' own medications (POMs) may pose safety risks when their use is not integrated into hospital medication-management processes. This study evaluated a multidisciplinary intervention for POM management in hospitalized older adults.

Patients and methods: This single-center before-and-after intervention study was conducted from March 2024 to February 2025. The intervention comprised five coordinated components: physician-led assessment, authorization, order entry, guidance, and monitoring; pharmacist-led verification, order review, and record maintenance; nurse-led verification, supervision, and education using color-coded labels (green, approved for use; red, not to be used; yellow, awaiting confirmation); IT-led integration of POM information into the electronic medication administration record; and procurement-led upgrades to storage equipment. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of POM-related medication errors per 1000 patient-days. Secondary outcomes were correct POM documentation within 24 hours of admission and correct POM storage at the pre-discharge assessment.

Results: The study included 162 patients, with 81 in each period. Before the intervention, 174 POM-related medication errors occurred over 1628 patient-days (106.9 per 1000 patient-days), compared with 29 errors over 1581 patient-days after the intervention (18.3 per 1000 patient-days). The incidence rate ratio was 0.172 (95% CI, 0.116-0.254; P<0.001), representing an 82.8% reduction. Correct POM documentation within 24 hours increased from 53.1% (43/81) to 92.6% (75/81; χ 2=31.951, P<0.001; OR=11.047, 95% CI, 4.319-28.253; RR=1.744, 95% CI, 1.408-2.160). Correct POM storage at the pre-discharge assessment increased from 32.1% (26/81) to 84.0% (68/81; χ 2=44.707, P<0.001).

Conclusion: The intervention was associated with improvements in all three measured POM outcomes at this center. Multicenter studies with longer follow-up are needed to assess generalizability and sustainability.

改善住院老年人患者自身药物管理:一项多学科干预前后研究
目的:当患者自己的药物(POMs)的使用不纳入医院的药物管理流程时,可能会造成安全风险。本研究评估了住院老年人POM管理的多学科干预。患者和方法:本研究于2024年3月至2025年2月进行单中心干预前后研究。干预包括五个协调的组成部分:医生主导的评估、授权、命令输入、指导和监测;药剂师主导的验证,订单审核和记录维护;由护士主导的验证、监督和教育,使用彩色编码标签(绿色,允许使用;红色,不允许使用;黄色,等待确认);以it为主导将POM信息集成到电子用药记录中;以及以采购为主导的存储设备升级。主要终点是每1000患者日的pom相关用药错误发生率。次要结果是入院24小时内正确的POM记录和出院前评估时正确的POM储存。结果:共纳入162例患者,每一期81例。干预前,1628患者日发生174例pom相关用药错误(每1000患者日106.9例),干预后1581患者日发生29例错误(每1000患者日18.3例)。发病率比为0.172 (95% CI, 0.116-0.254); Pχ 2=31.951, Pχ 2=44.707,结论:干预与该中心所有三个测量的POM结局的改善相关。需要长时间随访的多中心研究来评估其普遍性和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书