Association Between Capnographic Changes During Pulse Checks of Varying Durations and Clinical Outcomes During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Multicenter Study From Türkiye (CaPTuRe).
Gökhan Yılmaz, Muhammet Raşit Özer, Ramazan Köylü, Ejder Saylav Bora, Şakir Hakan Aksu, Cüneyt Arıkan, Bora Çekmen, İsmail Ataş, Gülin İnan, Müge Arslan, Oğuzhan Bol, Ozan Demir, Neslihan Şahin, Hüseyin Şahin, Arife Erdoğan, Hüseyin Avni Demir, Kadir Küçükceran, Mustafa Kürşat Ayrancı, Nazire Belgin Akıllı, Ecem Ermete Güler, Bedriye Müge Sönmez, Alanur Tarhan, Gökhan Ersunan, Özlem Bilir, Necmi Baykan, İbrahim Toker, Ahmet Çelik, İzzettin Hür, Hayriye Gönüllü, Abdulhalik Bekfelavi, Emine Kadıoğlu, Oğuzhan Can, İsmail Aktaş
{"title":"Association Between Capnographic Changes During Pulse Checks of Varying Durations and Clinical Outcomes During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Multicenter Study From Türkiye (CaPTuRe).","authors":"Gökhan Yılmaz, Muhammet Raşit Özer, Ramazan Köylü, Ejder Saylav Bora, Şakir Hakan Aksu, Cüneyt Arıkan, Bora Çekmen, İsmail Ataş, Gülin İnan, Müge Arslan, Oğuzhan Bol, Ozan Demir, Neslihan Şahin, Hüseyin Şahin, Arife Erdoğan, Hüseyin Avni Demir, Kadir Küçükceran, Mustafa Kürşat Ayrancı, Nazire Belgin Akıllı, Ecem Ermete Güler, Bedriye Müge Sönmez, Alanur Tarhan, Gökhan Ersunan, Özlem Bilir, Necmi Baykan, İbrahim Toker, Ahmet Çelik, İzzettin Hür, Hayriye Gönüllü, Abdulhalik Bekfelavi, Emine Kadıoğlu, Oğuzhan Can, İsmail Aktaş","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the association between capnographic changes during pulse checks of different durations and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective, controlled, quasi-randomized study categorized patients according to pulse check duration: Group A (≤5 seconds) and Group B (>5 to ≤10 seconds). Five measurements were obtained during the first six CPR cycles. Four capnographic parameters were evaluated for each measurement: Post-CPR end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO<sub>2</sub>), Pre-CPR ETCO<sub>2</sub>, loss rate (percentage decrease between Post- and Pre-CPR ETCO<sub>2</sub>), and recovery time (time required to regain the previous cycle's Post-CPR ETCO<sub>2</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 252 cardiac arrest patients (Group A, n=124; Group B, n=128). In Group A, patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) had markedly lower loss rates and shorter recovery times than non-survivors, together with higher pre- and post-CPR ETCO<sub>2</sub> values (all p<0.001). Group A also had a higher ROSC rate than Group B (36.3% vs. 19.5%; p=0.005). Logistic regression identified pulse check duration as an independent predictor of ROSC, with Group A having 2.39-fold higher odds of ROSC than Group B (odds ratio [OR]=2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.347-4.242; p=0.003). Pre-CPR ETCO<sub>2</sub> was strongly negatively correlated with loss rate (ρ=-0.770), whereas Pre- and Post-CPR ETCO<sub>2</sub> values (ρ=0.96) and loss rate and recovery time (ρ=0.89) were strongly positively correlated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pulse checks completed within 5 seconds were associated with more favorable capnographic dynamics and higher ROSC rates than those lasting 6-10 seconds. These findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"111358"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111358","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the association between capnographic changes during pulse checks of different durations and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) outcomes.
Methods: This multicenter, prospective, controlled, quasi-randomized study categorized patients according to pulse check duration: Group A (≤5 seconds) and Group B (>5 to ≤10 seconds). Five measurements were obtained during the first six CPR cycles. Four capnographic parameters were evaluated for each measurement: Post-CPR end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), Pre-CPR ETCO2, loss rate (percentage decrease between Post- and Pre-CPR ETCO2), and recovery time (time required to regain the previous cycle's Post-CPR ETCO2).
Results: The study included 252 cardiac arrest patients (Group A, n=124; Group B, n=128). In Group A, patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) had markedly lower loss rates and shorter recovery times than non-survivors, together with higher pre- and post-CPR ETCO2 values (all p<0.001). Group A also had a higher ROSC rate than Group B (36.3% vs. 19.5%; p=0.005). Logistic regression identified pulse check duration as an independent predictor of ROSC, with Group A having 2.39-fold higher odds of ROSC than Group B (odds ratio [OR]=2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.347-4.242; p=0.003). Pre-CPR ETCO2 was strongly negatively correlated with loss rate (ρ=-0.770), whereas Pre- and Post-CPR ETCO2 values (ρ=0.96) and loss rate and recovery time (ρ=0.89) were strongly positively correlated.
Conclusion: Pulse checks completed within 5 seconds were associated with more favorable capnographic dynamics and higher ROSC rates than those lasting 6-10 seconds. These findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant prospective validation.
期刊介绍:
Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.