Identifying the Operational Bottleneck to Shock Delivery After Automated External Defibrillator Activation.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Tsuyoshi Nojima, Tetsuya Yumoto, Takafumi Obara, Kohei Tokioka, Takashi Hongo, Yoshinori Kosaki, Kohei Tsukahara, Atsunori Nakao, Hiromichi Naito
{"title":"Identifying the Operational Bottleneck to Shock Delivery After Automated External Defibrillator Activation.","authors":"Tsuyoshi Nojima, Tetsuya Yumoto, Takafumi Obara, Kohei Tokioka, Takashi Hongo, Yoshinori Kosaki, Kohei Tsukahara, Atsunori Nakao, Hiromichi Naito","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiac arrest registries record automated external defibrillator (AED) use and shock delivery but not post-activation operational timing. We aimed to identify the largest measurable bottleneck and an exploratory pad-application target for shock delivery within 60 seconds of AED power-on.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed timestamps from remotely monitored Nihon Kohden AEDs between January 2018 and February 2026. After excluding inspection records, we grouped records into activation events and quantified intervals. Shock-timing and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were restricted to initially shock-advised events with recorded shock delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 8,115 activation events. Median times were 42 seconds (interquartile range [IQR], 30-56) from power-on to completion of pad application, nine seconds (IQR, 9-11) from pad application to the first analysis, and 52 seconds (IQR, 40-66) from power-on to the first analysis endpoint. The power-on-to-pad-application interval accounted for a median of 81% (IQR, 75-85) of the total power-on-to-first-analysis interval, increasing to 87% (IQR, 85-90) when first analysis occurred more than 60 seconds after power-on. Among 900 initially shock-advised events with recorded shock delivery, the median pad-application-to-shock interval was 15 seconds (IQR 13-17). Exploratory ROC analysis yielded a power-on to pad-application threshold of ≥ 51 seconds in relation to first recorded shock delivery occurring more than 60 seconds after AED power-on.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The interval from AED power-on to electronically detected completion of pad application, encompassing all intervening actions, was the largest measurable post-activation bottleneck. Completion within 50 seconds may serve as an exploratory process target for first recorded shock delivery within 60 seconds among initially shock-advised events.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"111361"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac arrest registries record automated external defibrillator (AED) use and shock delivery but not post-activation operational timing. We aimed to identify the largest measurable bottleneck and an exploratory pad-application target for shock delivery within 60 seconds of AED power-on.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed timestamps from remotely monitored Nihon Kohden AEDs between January 2018 and February 2026. After excluding inspection records, we grouped records into activation events and quantified intervals. Shock-timing and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were restricted to initially shock-advised events with recorded shock delivery.

Results: We analyzed 8,115 activation events. Median times were 42 seconds (interquartile range [IQR], 30-56) from power-on to completion of pad application, nine seconds (IQR, 9-11) from pad application to the first analysis, and 52 seconds (IQR, 40-66) from power-on to the first analysis endpoint. The power-on-to-pad-application interval accounted for a median of 81% (IQR, 75-85) of the total power-on-to-first-analysis interval, increasing to 87% (IQR, 85-90) when first analysis occurred more than 60 seconds after power-on. Among 900 initially shock-advised events with recorded shock delivery, the median pad-application-to-shock interval was 15 seconds (IQR 13-17). Exploratory ROC analysis yielded a power-on to pad-application threshold of ≥ 51 seconds in relation to first recorded shock delivery occurring more than 60 seconds after AED power-on.

Conclusions: The interval from AED power-on to electronically detected completion of pad application, encompassing all intervening actions, was the largest measurable post-activation bottleneck. Completion within 50 seconds may serve as an exploratory process target for first recorded shock delivery within 60 seconds among initially shock-advised events.

识别自动体外除颤器激活后休克递送的操作瓶颈。
简介:心脏骤停登记记录自动体外除颤器(AED)的使用和休克递送,但不记录激活后的操作时间。我们的目标是确定最大的可测量瓶颈,以及在AED通电60秒内进行冲击的探索性垫应用目标。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2026年2月期间远程监测的Nihon Kohden aed的时间戳。在排除检查记录后,我们将记录分组为激活事件并量化间隔。冲击时间和接受者工作特征(ROC)分析仅限于最初的冲击建议事件和记录的冲击传递。结果:我们分析了8115个激活事件。从启动到完成pad应用的中位时间为42秒(四分位间距[IQR], 30-56),从pad应用到第一次分析的中位时间为9秒(IQR, 9-11),从启动到第一个分析终点的中位时间为52秒(IQR, 40-66)。从开机到pad应用的时间间隔占总开机到首次分析时间间隔的中位数为81% (IQR, 75-85),当首次分析发生在开机后超过60秒时,这一比例增加到87% (IQR, 85-90)。在900例有电击记录的最初建议电击事件中,中位垫应用到电击间隔为15秒(IQR 13-17)。探索性ROC分析得出,与AED通电后超过60秒发生的首次记录电击有关,通电至垫应用阈值≥51秒。结论:从AED通电到电子检测pad应用完成的时间间隔,包括所有干预动作,是激活后可测量的最大瓶颈。在最初的冲击通知事件中,50秒内完成可作为60秒内首次记录的冲击传递的探索性过程目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书