Extended Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Chromosomal and Monogenic Disorders by Cell-Free DNA Sequencing: A Blinded Comparison With Amniocentesis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Alvaro Mesoraca, Katia Margiotti, Marco Fabiani, Francesco Libotte, Laura D'Emidio, Raffaella Raffio, Chiara Pasquale, Antonella Cima, Mauro Truglio, Antonella Viola, Claudio Giorlandino
{"title":"Extended Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Chromosomal and Monogenic Disorders by Cell-Free DNA Sequencing: A Blinded Comparison With Amniocentesis.","authors":"Alvaro Mesoraca, Katia Margiotti, Marco Fabiani, Francesco Libotte, Laura D'Emidio, Raffaella Raffio, Chiara Pasquale, Antonella Cima, Mauro Truglio, Antonella Viola, Claudio Giorlandino","doi":"10.1002/pd.70285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether molecular integrated non-invasive fetal exome sequencing (iNIFS), using clinical exome sequencing of maternal-plasma cell-free DNA, concords per pregnancy with paired amniocentesis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Prospective, blinded, single center, paired sample diagnostic accuracy study in 641 consecutive pregnancies referred for clinically indicated amniocentesis at 16-18 weeks. Plasma cell-free DNA underwent low-pass whole-genome sequencing for aneuploidies and CNVs and, after short-fragment enrichment, clinical exome sequencing within a parent fetus trio design. The reference standard comprised QF-PCR, karyotyping, array-comparative genomic hybridization and, where indicated, trio clinical exome sequencing on amniotic-fluid DNA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>iNIFS was reportable in 624/641 pregnancies (97.3%); 612 (95.5%) had complete paired data and formed the analysis population. The reference established a pathogenic or likely pathogenic finding in 107/612 (17.5%). NIPT gave 106 true positives, 503 true negatives, 2 discordant positives and 1 discordant negative: sensitivity 99.1% (95% CI 94.9-99.8), specificity 99.6% (98.6-99.9), PPV 98.1% (93.5-99.5), NPV 99.8% (98.9-100.0), agreement 99.5% and Cohen's κ 0.98. The discordant negative was a maternally inherited variant, the class for which distinguishing maternal from fetal contributions is most challenging.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Molecular iNIFS showed high concordance with paired amniocentesis across chromosomal, copy-number and monogenic findings, while retaining an explicit no call rate. Multicentre validation and invasive confirmation of positive findings remain necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether molecular integrated non-invasive fetal exome sequencing (iNIFS), using clinical exome sequencing of maternal-plasma cell-free DNA, concords per pregnancy with paired amniocentesis.

Method: Prospective, blinded, single center, paired sample diagnostic accuracy study in 641 consecutive pregnancies referred for clinically indicated amniocentesis at 16-18 weeks. Plasma cell-free DNA underwent low-pass whole-genome sequencing for aneuploidies and CNVs and, after short-fragment enrichment, clinical exome sequencing within a parent fetus trio design. The reference standard comprised QF-PCR, karyotyping, array-comparative genomic hybridization and, where indicated, trio clinical exome sequencing on amniotic-fluid DNA.

Results: iNIFS was reportable in 624/641 pregnancies (97.3%); 612 (95.5%) had complete paired data and formed the analysis population. The reference established a pathogenic or likely pathogenic finding in 107/612 (17.5%). NIPT gave 106 true positives, 503 true negatives, 2 discordant positives and 1 discordant negative: sensitivity 99.1% (95% CI 94.9-99.8), specificity 99.6% (98.6-99.9), PPV 98.1% (93.5-99.5), NPV 99.8% (98.9-100.0), agreement 99.5% and Cohen's κ 0.98. The discordant negative was a maternally inherited variant, the class for which distinguishing maternal from fetal contributions is most challenging.

Conclusion: Molecular iNIFS showed high concordance with paired amniocentesis across chromosomal, copy-number and monogenic findings, while retaining an explicit no call rate. Multicentre validation and invasive confirmation of positive findings remain necessary.

无细胞DNA测序扩展无创产前染色体和单基因疾病检测:与羊膜穿刺术的盲法比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书