Sagittal spinopelvic parameters in children and adolescents: a retrospective cross-sectional radiographic study from Turkey.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Mehmet Ali Dursun, Salih Kaya, Bilal Karabak, Mehmet Kocaslan
{"title":"Sagittal spinopelvic parameters in children and adolescents: a retrospective cross-sectional radiographic study from Turkey.","authors":"Mehmet Ali Dursun, Salih Kaya, Bilal Karabak, Mehmet Kocaslan","doi":"10.1007/s00247-026-06815-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sagittal spinal parameters are used to assess upright alignment during growth.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe sagittal spinopelvic parameters and assess their associations with age and sex in children and adolescents in Turkey.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study at a single tertiary orthopedic center included 344 children aged 6-17 years (186 boys, 158 girls) who underwent clinically indicated standing full-spine radiography. Pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, sagittal vertical axis, cervical vertebra (C) 2 tilt, thoracic vertebra (T) 4 tilt, lumbar vertebra (L) 1 tilt, T4 pelvic angle, and L1 pelvic angle were assessed. Age-group comparisons and age- and sex-adjusted linear models were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean (standard deviation) pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, and thoracic kyphosis were 45.4 (12.3)°, 11.3 (6.9)°, 34.2 (10.4)°, 57.5 (13.8)°, and 46.0 (13.4)°, respectively; sagittal vertical axis was 46.6 (27.6) mm. C2, T4, and L1 tilts were 5.0 (2.9)°, 10.4 (4.6)°, and 9.0 (4.7)°; T4 pelvic angle and L1 pelvic angle were 4.1 (3.1)° and 3.4 (3.1)°. Lumbar lordosis showed the largest adjusted age coefficient (1.81°/year; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-2.34; adjusted R<sup>2</sup>=0.121). T4 pelvic angle and L1 pelvic angle did not differ significantly across age groups (P=0.308 and P=0.966).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In children and adolescents without radiographic spinal or pelvic deformity, lumbar lordosis had the clearest cross-sectional association with age. No statistically significant age-group differences were detected for T4 pelvic angle or L1 pelvic angle. These data provide clinically relevant standing-radiograph reference data for sagittal spinopelvic parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-026-06815-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sagittal spinal parameters are used to assess upright alignment during growth.

Objective: To describe sagittal spinopelvic parameters and assess their associations with age and sex in children and adolescents in Turkey.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study at a single tertiary orthopedic center included 344 children aged 6-17 years (186 boys, 158 girls) who underwent clinically indicated standing full-spine radiography. Pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, sagittal vertical axis, cervical vertebra (C) 2 tilt, thoracic vertebra (T) 4 tilt, lumbar vertebra (L) 1 tilt, T4 pelvic angle, and L1 pelvic angle were assessed. Age-group comparisons and age- and sex-adjusted linear models were used.

Results: Mean (standard deviation) pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, and thoracic kyphosis were 45.4 (12.3)°, 11.3 (6.9)°, 34.2 (10.4)°, 57.5 (13.8)°, and 46.0 (13.4)°, respectively; sagittal vertical axis was 46.6 (27.6) mm. C2, T4, and L1 tilts were 5.0 (2.9)°, 10.4 (4.6)°, and 9.0 (4.7)°; T4 pelvic angle and L1 pelvic angle were 4.1 (3.1)° and 3.4 (3.1)°. Lumbar lordosis showed the largest adjusted age coefficient (1.81°/year; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-2.34; adjusted R2=0.121). T4 pelvic angle and L1 pelvic angle did not differ significantly across age groups (P=0.308 and P=0.966).

Conclusion: In children and adolescents without radiographic spinal or pelvic deformity, lumbar lordosis had the clearest cross-sectional association with age. No statistically significant age-group differences were detected for T4 pelvic angle or L1 pelvic angle. These data provide clinically relevant standing-radiograph reference data for sagittal spinopelvic parameters.

儿童和青少年的矢状椎盂参数:来自土耳其的回顾性横断面放射学研究。
背景:矢状面脊柱参数用于评估生长过程中的直立对齐。目的:描述矢状面脊柱骨盆参数,并评估其与土耳其儿童和青少年年龄和性别的关系。材料和方法:在一个三级骨科中心进行的回顾性横断面研究包括344名6-17岁的儿童(186名男孩,158名女孩),他们接受了临床指示的站立全脊柱x线摄影。评估骨盆发生率、骨盆倾斜、骶骨倾斜、腰椎前凸、胸后凸、矢状垂直轴、颈椎(C) 2倾斜、胸椎(T) 4倾斜、腰椎(L) 1倾斜、T4骨盆角、L1骨盆角。使用年龄组比较和年龄和性别调整的线性模型。结果:平均(标准差)骨盆发生率、骨盆倾斜、骶骨倾斜、腰椎前凸和胸后凸分别为45.4(12.3)°、11.3(6.9)°、34.2(10.4)°、57.5(13.8)°和46.0(13.4)°;矢状面垂直轴为46.6 (27.6)mm。C2、T4和L1的倾斜度分别为5.0(2.9)°、10.4(4.6)°和9.0(4.7)°;T4盆腔角4.1(3.1)°,L1盆腔角3.4(3.1)°。腰椎前凸的调整年龄系数最大(1.81°/年),95%可信区间(CI) 1.28 ~ 2.34;调整R2 = 0.121)。T4骨盆角和L1骨盆角在不同年龄组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.308和P=0.966)。结论:在没有脊柱或骨盆影像学畸形的儿童和青少年中,腰椎前凸与年龄有最明显的横断面相关性。T4盆腔角和L1盆腔角的年龄组差异无统计学意义。这些数据为脊柱骨盆矢状面参数提供了临床相关的站立位x线片参考数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书