The clinical significance of the modified Naples prognostic score for prostate cancer: a population-based study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hong Zeng, Fan Yang, Qian Wang, Tianyi Zhang, Junhao Chen, Shijie Jin, Tianrui Feng, Zhen Liang, Yuliang Chen, Zhiwei Xie, Chenhui Tang, Zhien Zhou, Yi Zhou, Weigang Yan
{"title":"The clinical significance of the modified Naples prognostic score for prostate cancer: a population-based study.","authors":"Hong Zeng, Fan Yang, Qian Wang, Tianyi Zhang, Junhao Chen, Shijie Jin, Tianrui Feng, Zhen Liang, Yuliang Chen, Zhiwei Xie, Chenhui Tang, Zhien Zhou, Yi Zhou, Weigang Yan","doi":"10.1186/s41043-026-01402-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) is a widely recognized scoring system used to assess inflammation and nutrition status, yet its role in prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the association between the modified NPS (MNPS) and PCa prevalence and mortality outcomes among participants with self-reported PCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2018 were collected. The NPS was calculated using MaxStat analysis, while M1NPS and M2NPS were constructed with X-Tile analysis. Weighted logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for PCa prevalence. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR) were employed to analyze the mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 22,027 individuals, 717 had PCa. After considering the interactions among different factors and adjusting for confounding variables, the prevalence of PCa was notably higher in participants with the highest MNPS groups (group 3) compared with those with the lowest groups (group 1) (OR (95% CI) = 2.96 (1.57-5.57) for M1NPS; 15.50 (1.78-134.71) for M2NPS). With a median follow-up of 9.92 years, 326 (45.47%) of all-cause deaths occurred among participants with self-reported PCa. Significant differences in all-cause mortality were observed between the MNPS groups (log-rank P < 0.001 for M1NPS and M2NPS). Compared to participants with self-reported PCa in group 1, the adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality in group 3 were 1.12 (95% CI: 0.49-2.57) for M1NPS and 2.02 (95% CI: 1.19-3.44) for M2NPS. Furthermore, a significant association was found between M2NPS and cardiovascular mortality (HR (95% CI) = 4.77 (1.95-11.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified and optimized NPS, which integrates inflammation and nutritional status, is associated with PCa prevalence and with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among individuals with self-reported PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":15969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13685192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-026-01402-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) is a widely recognized scoring system used to assess inflammation and nutrition status, yet its role in prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the association between the modified NPS (MNPS) and PCa prevalence and mortality outcomes among participants with self-reported PCa.

Methods: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2018 were collected. The NPS was calculated using MaxStat analysis, while M1NPS and M2NPS were constructed with X-Tile analysis. Weighted logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for PCa prevalence. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR) were employed to analyze the mortality risk.

Results: Among 22,027 individuals, 717 had PCa. After considering the interactions among different factors and adjusting for confounding variables, the prevalence of PCa was notably higher in participants with the highest MNPS groups (group 3) compared with those with the lowest groups (group 1) (OR (95% CI) = 2.96 (1.57-5.57) for M1NPS; 15.50 (1.78-134.71) for M2NPS). With a median follow-up of 9.92 years, 326 (45.47%) of all-cause deaths occurred among participants with self-reported PCa. Significant differences in all-cause mortality were observed between the MNPS groups (log-rank P < 0.001 for M1NPS and M2NPS). Compared to participants with self-reported PCa in group 1, the adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality in group 3 were 1.12 (95% CI: 0.49-2.57) for M1NPS and 2.02 (95% CI: 1.19-3.44) for M2NPS. Furthermore, a significant association was found between M2NPS and cardiovascular mortality (HR (95% CI) = 4.77 (1.95-11.65).

Conclusion: The modified and optimized NPS, which integrates inflammation and nutritional status, is associated with PCa prevalence and with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among individuals with self-reported PCa.

改良那不勒斯预后评分对前列腺癌的临床意义:一项基于人群的研究。
目的:那不勒斯预后评分(NPS)是一种广泛认可的评分系统,用于评估炎症和营养状况,但其在前列腺癌(PCa)中的作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨改良NPS (MNPS)与自我报告PCa的参与者中PCa患病率和死亡率结果之间的关系。方法:收集1999-2018年全国健康与营养检查调查数据。使用MaxStat分析计算NPS,使用X-Tile分析构建M1NPS和M2NPS。加权逻辑回归用于估计PCa患病率的优势比(OR)。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析、log-rank检验和Cox比例风险比(HR)分析死亡风险。结果:在22,027人中,717人患有前列腺癌。在考虑不同因素之间的相互作用并调整混杂变量后,最高MNPS组(3组)的参与者PCa患病率明显高于最低MNPS组(1组)(OR (95% CI) = 2.96 (1.57-5.57);M2NPS为15.50(1.78-134.71)。中位随访9.92年,326例(45.47%)的全因死亡发生在自我报告PCa的参与者中。结论:改进和优化的NPS整合了炎症和营养状况,与前列腺癌患病率以及自我报告的前列腺癌患者的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition brings together research on all aspects of issues related to population, nutrition and health. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including global health, maternal and child health, nutrition, common illnesses and determinants of population health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书