Associations between professional values and self-actualization among South Korean and Chinese medical students.

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Hyojeong Hwang, Jun-Ki Lee, Qiuyue Fang, Hyo Hyun Yoo
{"title":"Associations between professional values and self-actualization among South Korean and Chinese medical students.","authors":"Hyojeong Hwang, Jun-Ki Lee, Qiuyue Fang, Hyo Hyun Yoo","doi":"10.5116/ijme.6ac6.3280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare professional values endorsed at one South Korean and one Chinese medical school, examine which values were associated with endorsement of self-actualization, and identify latent value classes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional convenience survey of 321 medical students: 211 second- and third-year students at a Korean national university, 110 at a Chinese medical college. Twelve items (11 values, self-actualization) were scored as endorsed or not, with unlimited selections; the Chinese version was back-translated. Analyses were t-tests, phi coefficients, logistic regression, and latent class analysis with Benjamini-Hochberg correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Competence was endorsed most frequently in both samples. Korean students endorsed competence, t<sub>(319)</sub> = 3.27, p = .001, and collaboration, t<sub>(319)</sub> = 4.05, p < .001, more often, Chinese students endorsed social recognition, t<sub>(319)</sub> = -3.01, p = .003; all survived correction, with small effects (d = 0.38, 0.48, -0.35). Satisfaction with the major was higher in the Korean sample, t<sub>(318)</sub> = 27.66, p < .001, d = 3.26, reported descriptively only. Social contribution was associated with self-actualization in both samples (r = .25 Korean, .44 Chinese) and was the only logistic coefficient to remain significant after adjustment (OR = 5.42, p = .001, Chinese sample); Korean associations attenuated after adjusting for the number of values endorsed. Latent classes (two Korean, three Chinese) differed mainly in endorsement breadth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social contribution was the most consistent correlate of endorsement of self-actualization. Because each country was represented by one institution, differences cannot be attributed to culture. Career guidance may address value heterogeneity within cohorts; multi-institutional longitudinal research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"17 ","pages":"146-155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13682275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.6ac6.3280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare professional values endorsed at one South Korean and one Chinese medical school, examine which values were associated with endorsement of self-actualization, and identify latent value classes.

Methods: Cross-sectional convenience survey of 321 medical students: 211 second- and third-year students at a Korean national university, 110 at a Chinese medical college. Twelve items (11 values, self-actualization) were scored as endorsed or not, with unlimited selections; the Chinese version was back-translated. Analyses were t-tests, phi coefficients, logistic regression, and latent class analysis with Benjamini-Hochberg correction.

Results: Competence was endorsed most frequently in both samples. Korean students endorsed competence, t(319) = 3.27, p = .001, and collaboration, t(319) = 4.05, p < .001, more often, Chinese students endorsed social recognition, t(319) = -3.01, p = .003; all survived correction, with small effects (d = 0.38, 0.48, -0.35). Satisfaction with the major was higher in the Korean sample, t(318) = 27.66, p < .001, d = 3.26, reported descriptively only. Social contribution was associated with self-actualization in both samples (r = .25 Korean, .44 Chinese) and was the only logistic coefficient to remain significant after adjustment (OR = 5.42, p = .001, Chinese sample); Korean associations attenuated after adjusting for the number of values endorsed. Latent classes (two Korean, three Chinese) differed mainly in endorsement breadth.

Conclusions: Social contribution was the most consistent correlate of endorsement of self-actualization. Because each country was represented by one institution, differences cannot be attributed to culture. Career guidance may address value heterogeneity within cohorts; multi-institutional longitudinal research is needed.

韩国和中国医学生职业价值观与自我实现的关系
目的:比较一所韩国和一所中国医学院认可的职业价值观,检查哪些价值观与自我实现的认可有关,并确定潜在的价值类别。方法:对321名医科学生进行横断面调查,其中韩国某国立大学二、三年级211名,中国某医科大学110名。12个项目(11个值,自我实现)评分为认可或不认可,无限制选择;中文版是反译的。分析采用t检验、phi系数、logistic回归和benjamin - hochberg校正的潜在类分析。结果:在两个样本中,能力被认可的频率最高。韩国学生更倾向于能力,t(319) = 3.27, p = 0.001;协作,t(319) = 4.05, p < 0.001;中国学生更倾向于社会认同,t(319) = -3.01, p = 0.003;所有校正后存活,影响较小(d = 0.38, 0.48, -0.35)。韩国样本对专业的满意度较高,t(318) = 27.66, p < 0.001, d = 3.26,仅描述性报告。在两个样本中,社会贡献与自我实现相关(r = 0.25)。44名中国人),并且是调整后唯一保持显著的logistic系数(OR = 5.42, p = .001,中国样本);韩国协会在调整认可的价值观数量后有所减弱。潜在阶层(2个韩国、3个中国)的认同广度差异最大。结论:社会贡献与自我实现认同的关系最为一致。因为每个国家都由一个机构代表,所以差异不能归因于文化。职业指导可以解决群体内的价值异质性;需要多机构的纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书