Intensivists' Perspectives and Practices on Palliative Care in the ICU: A Nationwide Survey in Korea.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tae Jung Kim, Yoon Sun Jung, Ye Sul Jeung, Woo Hyun Cho, Shin Hye Yoo, Jae Young Moon
{"title":"Intensivists' Perspectives and Practices on Palliative Care in the ICU: A Nationwide Survey in Korea.","authors":"Tae Jung Kim, Yoon Sun Jung, Ye Sul Jeung, Woo Hyun Cho, Shin Hye Yoo, Jae Young Moon","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2026.41.e119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While many countries have made progress in integrating palliative care into intensive care units (ICUs), implementation remains highly context-dependent. In Korea, palliative care integration within ICUs remains limited, and intensivists' perspectives on its role and applicability have not been well studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide, cross-sectional online survey of certified intensivists and fellows registered with the Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine between April and May 2024. The questionnaire explored knowledge and confidence in palliative care, current ICU practices, referral patterns, perceived barriers, and preferred strategies for integration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 241 intensivists responded (response rate, 23.9%). Most agreed that palliative care should be incorporated into ICU care (97.1%) and were willing to make referrals (98.3%). Advance care planning, symptom management, and family decision-making were the most expected domains of support. However, fewer reported involvement in psychological support, end-of-life care, or bereavement services. Referral practices were more frequent in institutions with palliative care teams, while lack of resources, unsupportive institutional culture, and unclear processes were commonly cited barriers. Clinical guidelines, professional education, and reimbursement reform were identified as priority strategies for integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Korean intensivists widely recognize the need for palliative care in the ICU but apply it within a limited scope. To strengthen integration, consensus on definitions, clear referral criteria, and supportive institutional and policy frameworks are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"41 40","pages":"e119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13682906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2026.41.e119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While many countries have made progress in integrating palliative care into intensive care units (ICUs), implementation remains highly context-dependent. In Korea, palliative care integration within ICUs remains limited, and intensivists' perspectives on its role and applicability have not been well studied.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide, cross-sectional online survey of certified intensivists and fellows registered with the Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine between April and May 2024. The questionnaire explored knowledge and confidence in palliative care, current ICU practices, referral patterns, perceived barriers, and preferred strategies for integration.

Results: A total of 241 intensivists responded (response rate, 23.9%). Most agreed that palliative care should be incorporated into ICU care (97.1%) and were willing to make referrals (98.3%). Advance care planning, symptom management, and family decision-making were the most expected domains of support. However, fewer reported involvement in psychological support, end-of-life care, or bereavement services. Referral practices were more frequent in institutions with palliative care teams, while lack of resources, unsupportive institutional culture, and unclear processes were commonly cited barriers. Clinical guidelines, professional education, and reimbursement reform were identified as priority strategies for integration.

Conclusion: Korean intensivists widely recognize the need for palliative care in the ICU but apply it within a limited scope. To strengthen integration, consensus on definitions, clear referral criteria, and supportive institutional and policy frameworks are required.

ICU重症监护医师对姑息治疗的看法与实践:一项韩国全国调查。
背景:虽然许多国家在将姑息治疗纳入重症监护病房方面取得了进展,但实施情况仍然高度依赖于具体情况。在韩国,姑息治疗在icu内的整合仍然有限,重症医师对其作用和适用性的看法尚未得到很好的研究。方法:我们在2024年4月至5月期间对在韩国重症医学学会注册的认证重症医师和研究员进行了全国性的横断面在线调查。问卷调查了对姑息治疗的知识和信心、当前ICU实践、转诊模式、感知障碍和首选整合策略。结果:共有241名重症监护医师应答,有效率为23.9%。大多数人同意姑息治疗应纳入ICU护理(97.1%),并愿意转诊(98.3%)。提前护理计划、症状管理和家庭决策是最期望得到支持的领域。然而,较少报告参与心理支持,临终关怀或丧亲服务。转诊实践在拥有姑息治疗团队的机构中更为常见,而缺乏资源、不支持的机构文化和不明确的流程是常见的障碍。临床指南、专业教育和报销改革被确定为整合的优先策略。结论:韩国重症医师广泛认识到缓和护理在ICU的必要性,但在有限的范围内应用。为了加强一体化,需要就定义、明确的转诊标准以及支持性的体制和政策框架达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书