Comparison of the Efficacy of Intralesional Methotrexate and Triamcinolone in the Treatment of Nail Psoriasis: A Randomized, Investigator-Blind, Controlled Trial.

IF 2 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Kourosh Ahmadi, Mozhdeh Sepaskhah, Zahra Bagheri, Roya Radanfar
{"title":"Comparison of the Efficacy of Intralesional Methotrexate and Triamcinolone in the Treatment of Nail Psoriasis: A Randomized, Investigator-Blind, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Kourosh Ahmadi, Mozhdeh Sepaskhah, Zahra Bagheri, Roya Radanfar","doi":"10.4103/idoj.idoj_1017_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nail psoriasis is a common and challenging-to-treat manifestation of psoriasis. The efficacy of several medications has been studied in treating nail psoriasis with different results.</p><p><strong>Aim and objective: </strong>This trial assessed the therapeutic efficacy and safety of intralesional methotrexate injection compared to intralesional triamcinolone injection for nail psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Seventeen patients (69 nails) were recruited in this investigator-blind, randomized, controlled trial, and 13 patients (65 nails) completed the study. The severity of the disease was evaluated by the modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) before starting treatment, after each injection, and 8 weeks after the last injection. Thirty-three nails were randomly treated with methotrexate and 32 nails with triamcinolone. A volume of 0.1 mL of the diluted (5 mg/mL) triamcinolone (0.5 mg) or 0.05 mL of methotrexate (1.25 mg) was injected at each point every 3 weeks for four sessions. (Clinical trial registry: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials. [ID: IRCT20140212016557N7]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both interventions significantly reduced the mNAPSI score ( P < 0.001). The percentage of reduction of mNAPSI score was more in the triamcinolone-treated nails at the end of treatment ( P = 0.015), but not significantly different in the 8-week follow-up ( P = 0.906). Deterioration of the mNAPSI score was seen only in the triamcinolone group at the end of 8 weeks after discontinuation of treatment ( P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>A relatively small sample size, lack of prolonged follow-up, and absence of response assessment of the nail matrix and bed separately.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intralesional methotrexate is an effective and safe treatment for nail psoriasis, with similar efficacy to intralesional triamcinolone. Methotrexate showed more persistent efficacy compared to triamcinolone.</p>","PeriodicalId":13335,"journal":{"name":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_1017_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nail psoriasis is a common and challenging-to-treat manifestation of psoriasis. The efficacy of several medications has been studied in treating nail psoriasis with different results.

Aim and objective: This trial assessed the therapeutic efficacy and safety of intralesional methotrexate injection compared to intralesional triamcinolone injection for nail psoriasis.

Patients and methods: Seventeen patients (69 nails) were recruited in this investigator-blind, randomized, controlled trial, and 13 patients (65 nails) completed the study. The severity of the disease was evaluated by the modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) before starting treatment, after each injection, and 8 weeks after the last injection. Thirty-three nails were randomly treated with methotrexate and 32 nails with triamcinolone. A volume of 0.1 mL of the diluted (5 mg/mL) triamcinolone (0.5 mg) or 0.05 mL of methotrexate (1.25 mg) was injected at each point every 3 weeks for four sessions. (Clinical trial registry: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials. [ID: IRCT20140212016557N7]).

Results: Both interventions significantly reduced the mNAPSI score ( P < 0.001). The percentage of reduction of mNAPSI score was more in the triamcinolone-treated nails at the end of treatment ( P = 0.015), but not significantly different in the 8-week follow-up ( P = 0.906). Deterioration of the mNAPSI score was seen only in the triamcinolone group at the end of 8 weeks after discontinuation of treatment ( P = 0.01).

Limitations: A relatively small sample size, lack of prolonged follow-up, and absence of response assessment of the nail matrix and bed separately.

Conclusion: Intralesional methotrexate is an effective and safe treatment for nail psoriasis, with similar efficacy to intralesional triamcinolone. Methotrexate showed more persistent efficacy compared to triamcinolone.

甲氨蝶呤与曲安奈德治疗甲癣的疗效比较:一项随机、研究者盲、对照试验。
背景:甲型银屑病是银屑病中一种常见且具有挑战性的临床表现。几种药物治疗甲牛皮癣的疗效已被研究,结果不同。目的和目的:本试验比较甲氨蝶呤局部注射与曲安奈德局部注射治疗甲癣的疗效和安全性。患者和方法:本次研究者盲、随机、对照试验共招募17例患者(69根指甲),13例患者(65根指甲)完成研究。在治疗开始前、每次注射后和最后一次注射后8周,采用改良的指甲银屑病严重程度指数(mNAPSI)评估疾病的严重程度。随机采用甲氨蝶呤治疗33枚,曲安奈德治疗32枚。每3周在每个穴位注射0.1 mL稀释后(5 mg/mL)曲安奈德(0.5 mg)或0.05 mL甲氨蝶呤(1.25 mg),共注射4次。临床试验注册:伊朗临床试验注册中心。[ID: IRCT20140212016557N7])。结果:两种干预措施均显著降低了mNAPSI评分(P < 0.001)。曲安奈德治疗组在治疗结束时mNAPSI评分下降的百分比更高(P = 0.015),但在8周的随访中差异无统计学意义(P = 0.906)。停药后8周,曲安奈德组mNAPSI评分出现恶化(P = 0.01)。局限性:样本量相对较小,缺乏长期随访,缺乏分别对甲基质和甲床的反应评估。结论:甲氨蝶呤是一种安全有效的治疗甲癣的药物,其疗效与曲安奈德相似。与曲安奈德相比,甲氨蝶呤显示出更持久的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
201
审稿时长
49 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书