EVALUATION OF BOTULINUM TOXIN INJECTION AS A BRIDGE THERAPY TO PERORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Anna Pèlach, Anna Calm, Raquel Muñoz-González, Luis Wong, Antonio Marin Garcia, Marc Vidal, Laura Gutiérrez, Eva Vayreda, Ingrid Marín, Hugo Uchima
{"title":"EVALUATION OF BOTULINUM TOXIN INJECTION AS A BRIDGE THERAPY TO PERORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY.","authors":"Anna Pèlach, Anna Calm, Raquel Muñoz-González, Luis Wong, Antonio Marin Garcia, Marc Vidal, Laura Gutiérrez, Eva Vayreda, Ingrid Marín, Hugo Uchima","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2026.502853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate whether botulinum toxin injection (BTI) prior to peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in patients with esophageal motility disorders affects POEM feasibility, safety, and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive POEM performed from July 2019 to July 2024 with ≥ 6-month follow-up. POEM indications were achalasia (97%) and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) (3%). Clinical success (Eckardt score [ES] post-POEM ≤3), technical success, safety, submucosal fibrosis in lower esophageal sphincter and adverse events (AE) (bleeding, capnoperitoneum and mucosal defects) were compared between two groups: A) patients with BTI prior to POEM, and B) patients whom POEM was the first treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69 POEM were performed. Indications included type I achalasia (n=10), type II (n=43), type III (n=14) and EGJOO (n=2). A) 10 patients with prior BTI, and B) 59 treatment-naïve patients. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. The specific indication for BTI as bridging therapy was 30%. Clinical success was comparable, 100% in the BTI group vs 96% in treatment-naïve group (p=1). Submucosal fibrosis was more frequently observed in patients with previous LES BTI, however, this difference was not statistically significant: 30% in prior BTI vs 11.6% in naïve, p= 0.26. AE rates were comparable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BTI appears to be a suitable bridging therapy for patients awaiting POEM, without adversely affecting its feasibility, safety, and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":" ","pages":"502853"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2026.502853","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate whether botulinum toxin injection (BTI) prior to peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in patients with esophageal motility disorders affects POEM feasibility, safety, and efficacy.

Patients and methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive POEM performed from July 2019 to July 2024 with ≥ 6-month follow-up. POEM indications were achalasia (97%) and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) (3%). Clinical success (Eckardt score [ES] post-POEM ≤3), technical success, safety, submucosal fibrosis in lower esophageal sphincter and adverse events (AE) (bleeding, capnoperitoneum and mucosal defects) were compared between two groups: A) patients with BTI prior to POEM, and B) patients whom POEM was the first treatment.

Results: A total of 69 POEM were performed. Indications included type I achalasia (n=10), type II (n=43), type III (n=14) and EGJOO (n=2). A) 10 patients with prior BTI, and B) 59 treatment-naïve patients. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. The specific indication for BTI as bridging therapy was 30%. Clinical success was comparable, 100% in the BTI group vs 96% in treatment-naïve group (p=1). Submucosal fibrosis was more frequently observed in patients with previous LES BTI, however, this difference was not statistically significant: 30% in prior BTI vs 11.6% in naïve, p= 0.26. AE rates were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion: BTI appears to be a suitable bridging therapy for patients awaiting POEM, without adversely affecting its feasibility, safety, and efficacy.

肉毒毒素注射作为经口内窥镜下肌切开术的桥梁治疗的评价。
目的:评价食管运动障碍患者经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)前注射肉毒杆菌毒素(BTI)是否影响POEM的可行性、安全性和有效性。患者和方法:2019年7月至2024年7月连续行POEM的单中心回顾性分析,随访≥6个月。POEM适应症为贲门失弛缓症(97%)和食管胃交界流出梗阻(EGJOO)(3%)。比较两组患者的临床成功率(POEM后Eckardt评分[ES]≤3)、技术成功率、安全性、食管下括约肌粘膜下纤维化及不良事件(出血、腹膜和粘膜缺损):A) POEM前BTI患者和B) POEM为首次治疗的患者。结果:共进行了69例POEM。适应症包括I型失弛缓症(n=10)、II型失弛缓症(n=43)、III型失弛缓症(n=14)和EGJOO (n=2)。A)既往BTI患者10例,B) treatment-naïve患者59例。两组间基线特征无显著差异。BTI作为桥接治疗的具体适应症为30%。临床成功率相当,BTI组为100%,treatment-naïve组为96% (p=1)。粘膜下纤维化在既往LES BTI患者中更为常见,但差异无统计学意义:既往BTI患者为30%,naïve患者为11.6%,p= 0.26。两组的AE发生率具有可比性。结论:BTI似乎是等待POEM患者的一种合适的桥接疗法,不会对其可行性、安全性和有效性产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology and Hepatology is the first journal to cover the latest advances in pathology of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, pancreas, and bile ducts, making it an indispensable tool for gastroenterologists, hepatologists, internists and general practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书