Applications of artificial intelligence in traditional Chinese medicine tongue diagnosis: a bibliometric review of research trends and hotspots, 2015-2026.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2026-10-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2026.1895902
Yilin Li, Yang Yang, Shaoqin Lin, Hengxu Wang, Liyuan Yan, Mingxiang Zheng, Lei Xiang, Xiangjiang Tang
{"title":"Applications of artificial intelligence in traditional Chinese medicine tongue diagnosis: a bibliometric review of research trends and hotspots, 2015-2026.","authors":"Yilin Li, Yang Yang, Shaoqin Lin, Hengxu Wang, Liyuan Yan, Mingxiang Zheng, Lei Xiang, Xiangjiang Tang","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2026.1895902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to characterize the development landscape of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted tongue diagnosis in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) by comparing publication trends, collaboration patterns, research hotspots, and emerging topics between CNKI-indexed and WoSCC-indexed literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature published between January 2015 and August 2026 was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Publication trends were summarized descriptively, and CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used for collaboration-network, keyword co-occurrence, clustering, timeline, burst-detection, and journal citation analyses. CNKI-indexed and WoSCC-indexed records were analysed separately because of differences in database coverage, indexing characteristics, metadata structures, and publication practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 482 studies were included, comprising 295 WoSCC-indexed and 187 CNKI-indexed records. Publication output showed an overall upward trend in both datasets over the study period. The CNKI keyword clustering network showed high clustering quality (modularity Q = 0.7929; weighted mean silhouette S = 0.9413), as did the WoSCC network (Q = 0.8000; S = 0.9239). In CNKI, the strongest keyword bursts included \"deep learning\" (strength = 2.95), \"image segmentation\" (2.69), and \"transfer learning\" (2.61); in WoSCC, prominent bursts included \"artificial intelligence\" (2.13), \"image colour analysis\" (2.10), and \"machine learning\" (1.86). CNKI-indexed literature showed prominent themes involving tongue-image objectification, segmentation, and TCM-oriented diagnostic concepts, whereas WoSCC-indexed literature showed more differentiated themes involving AI architectures, tongue-feature analysis, computational modelling, and disease-related applications. Highly cited publications in both datasets further reflected the importance of tongue-image extraction and segmentation and the subsequent expansion toward disease-oriented modelling. Across both datasets, the temporal patterns suggested a shift in research attention from conventional image processing and feature extraction toward machine learning, deep learning, and more integrated AI-based approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two datasets showed complementary but database-specific thematic structures in AI-assisted tongue diagnosis. Although the literature indicates a shift toward more advanced and disease-oriented AI applications, these bibliometric patterns do not establish the scientific or medical validity, diagnostic accuracy, or clinical readiness of AI-assisted tongue analysis. Further standardization, multicentre external validation, and clinically interpretable and reproducible research are needed before broader clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1895902"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13678510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2026.1895902","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the development landscape of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted tongue diagnosis in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) by comparing publication trends, collaboration patterns, research hotspots, and emerging topics between CNKI-indexed and WoSCC-indexed literature.

Methods: Literature published between January 2015 and August 2026 was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Publication trends were summarized descriptively, and CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used for collaboration-network, keyword co-occurrence, clustering, timeline, burst-detection, and journal citation analyses. CNKI-indexed and WoSCC-indexed records were analysed separately because of differences in database coverage, indexing characteristics, metadata structures, and publication practices.

Results: A total of 482 studies were included, comprising 295 WoSCC-indexed and 187 CNKI-indexed records. Publication output showed an overall upward trend in both datasets over the study period. The CNKI keyword clustering network showed high clustering quality (modularity Q = 0.7929; weighted mean silhouette S = 0.9413), as did the WoSCC network (Q = 0.8000; S = 0.9239). In CNKI, the strongest keyword bursts included "deep learning" (strength = 2.95), "image segmentation" (2.69), and "transfer learning" (2.61); in WoSCC, prominent bursts included "artificial intelligence" (2.13), "image colour analysis" (2.10), and "machine learning" (1.86). CNKI-indexed literature showed prominent themes involving tongue-image objectification, segmentation, and TCM-oriented diagnostic concepts, whereas WoSCC-indexed literature showed more differentiated themes involving AI architectures, tongue-feature analysis, computational modelling, and disease-related applications. Highly cited publications in both datasets further reflected the importance of tongue-image extraction and segmentation and the subsequent expansion toward disease-oriented modelling. Across both datasets, the temporal patterns suggested a shift in research attention from conventional image processing and feature extraction toward machine learning, deep learning, and more integrated AI-based approaches.

Conclusions: The two datasets showed complementary but database-specific thematic structures in AI-assisted tongue diagnosis. Although the literature indicates a shift toward more advanced and disease-oriented AI applications, these bibliometric patterns do not establish the scientific or medical validity, diagnostic accuracy, or clinical readiness of AI-assisted tongue analysis. Further standardization, multicentre external validation, and clinically interpretable and reproducible research are needed before broader clinical application.

人工智能在中医舌诊中的应用:2015-2026年研究趋势与热点文献计量学综述
目的:通过比较cnki和woscc文献的发表趋势、合作模式、研究热点和新兴话题,了解人工智能辅助中医舌诊的发展格局。方法:检索Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)和中国知网(CNKI) 2015年1月- 2026年8月发表的文献。利用CiteSpace和VOSviewer进行协同网络、关键词共现、聚类、时间线、突发检测和期刊引文分析。由于数据库覆盖范围、索引特征、元数据结构和出版实践的差异,我们分别对cnki索引和woscc索引的记录进行了分析。结果:共纳入482篇文献,其中woscc检索295篇,cnki检索187篇。在研究期间,这两个数据集的出版物产量总体呈上升趋势。CNKI关键词聚类网络具有较高的聚类质量(模块化Q = 0.7929,加权平均轮廓S = 0.9413), WoSCC网络具有较高的聚类质量(Q = 0.8000, S = 0.9239)。在CNKI中,关键词爆发强度最强的包括“深度学习”(强度为2.95)、“图像分割”(强度为2.69)和“迁移学习”(强度为2.61);在WoSCC中,突出的突破包括“人工智能”(2.13)、“图像颜色分析”(2.10)和“机器学习”(1.86)。cnki检索的文献主题突出,涉及舌头图像客观化、切分和面向中医的诊断概念,而woscc检索的文献主题更加分化,涉及人工智能架构、舌头特征分析、计算建模和疾病相关应用。这两个数据集中被高度引用的出版物进一步反映了舌头图像提取和分割的重要性,以及随后向疾病导向建模的扩展。在这两个数据集中,时间模式表明研究注意力从传统的图像处理和特征提取转向机器学习、深度学习和更集成的基于人工智能的方法。结论:这两个数据集在人工智能辅助舌头诊断中显示了互补但数据库特定的主题结构。尽管文献表明,人工智能应用正在向更先进和面向疾病的人工智能应用转变,但这些文献计量学模式并不能确定人工智能辅助舌头分析的科学或医学有效性、诊断准确性或临床准备程度。在更广泛的临床应用之前,需要进一步的标准化、多中心外部验证以及临床可解释和可重复的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书