Motor network neurophysiological (TMS-EEG) markers as predictors of outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt sustained for over a year in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

IF 7.2 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Tal Davidy, Alexandra Suminski, Yakov Zauberman, Tsvia Fay-Karmon, Saar Anis, Adi Saar, Noa Zifman, Hilla Fogel, Ofri Levy-Lamdan, Orit Lesman-Segev, Sharon Hassin-Baer
{"title":"Motor network neurophysiological (TMS-EEG) markers as predictors of outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt sustained for over a year in normal pressure hydrocephalus.","authors":"Tal Davidy, Alexandra Suminski, Yakov Zauberman, Tsvia Fay-Karmon, Saar Anis, Adi Saar, Noa Zifman, Hilla Fogel, Ofri Levy-Lamdan, Orit Lesman-Segev, Sharon Hassin-Baer","doi":"10.1186/s12987-026-00844-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Current practice for normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) relies on clinical presentation, imaging, and various clinical procedures to determine the need for neurosurgical intervention, specifically the installation of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS). This study aimed to evaluate the utility of a TMS-evoked potential (TEP)-based assessment (Delphi-MD) for predicting sustained response (over one year) to VPS, serving as an ancillary test to the cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CTT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-one patients with possible iNPH underwent Delphi-MD evaluation of wave form adherence (WFA), a composite measure assessing how closely their TEPs resembled an ideal benchmark TEP. Of these, 18 patients received VPS treatment following a multidisciplinary team decision based on standard practice, blinded to the TEP results. Response to the intervention was evaluated over a period of more than one year using the clinical global impression of change (CGIC) scale, in addition to assessments with a 10-meter timed up and go test and the modified Rankin scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responders had higher M1L WFA values at baseline (prior to VPS) than non-responders (median 0.51 [95% CI 0.36-0.76], median 0.14 [95% CI -0.02-0.38], respectively p = 0.012). M1L WFA was successful in distinguishing responders (11/18) from non-responders (7/18) with an ROC-AUC of 0.935 [bootstrap 95% CI 0.792-1.00], p < 0.0001. M1L WFA cutoff was established with LOOCV and produced 90.9% sensitivity, 85.7% specificity and 88.9% accuracy. In contrast the CTT result was unsuccessful in predicting shunt responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that higher M1L WFA obtained through Delphi-MD (TMS-EEG), signifies better preservation and functional integrity of the motor network in patients with probable iNPH that had a sustained response to VPS than those that did not. Given replication of results in future independent cohorts, Delphi-MD shows promise as an objective, accurate, and accessible ancillary screening tool for iNPH candidates, prior to referral for VPS treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registration number: MOH_2021-12-08_010449. Registration date: 11.09.2021. https://clinicaltrial.health.gov.il/clinicaltrials/?sort=experimentapproveddate_tdt+desc&page=1&searchQuery=MOH_2021-12-08_010449 .</p>","PeriodicalId":12321,"journal":{"name":"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13685369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-026-00844-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Current practice for normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) relies on clinical presentation, imaging, and various clinical procedures to determine the need for neurosurgical intervention, specifically the installation of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS). This study aimed to evaluate the utility of a TMS-evoked potential (TEP)-based assessment (Delphi-MD) for predicting sustained response (over one year) to VPS, serving as an ancillary test to the cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CTT).

Methods: Forty-one patients with possible iNPH underwent Delphi-MD evaluation of wave form adherence (WFA), a composite measure assessing how closely their TEPs resembled an ideal benchmark TEP. Of these, 18 patients received VPS treatment following a multidisciplinary team decision based on standard practice, blinded to the TEP results. Response to the intervention was evaluated over a period of more than one year using the clinical global impression of change (CGIC) scale, in addition to assessments with a 10-meter timed up and go test and the modified Rankin scale.

Results: Responders had higher M1L WFA values at baseline (prior to VPS) than non-responders (median 0.51 [95% CI 0.36-0.76], median 0.14 [95% CI -0.02-0.38], respectively p = 0.012). M1L WFA was successful in distinguishing responders (11/18) from non-responders (7/18) with an ROC-AUC of 0.935 [bootstrap 95% CI 0.792-1.00], p < 0.0001. M1L WFA cutoff was established with LOOCV and produced 90.9% sensitivity, 85.7% specificity and 88.9% accuracy. In contrast the CTT result was unsuccessful in predicting shunt responsiveness.

Conclusion: This study indicates that higher M1L WFA obtained through Delphi-MD (TMS-EEG), signifies better preservation and functional integrity of the motor network in patients with probable iNPH that had a sustained response to VPS than those that did not. Given replication of results in future independent cohorts, Delphi-MD shows promise as an objective, accurate, and accessible ancillary screening tool for iNPH candidates, prior to referral for VPS treatment.

Trial registration: Registration number: MOH_2021-12-08_010449. Registration date: 11.09.2021. https://clinicaltrial.health.gov.il/clinicaltrials/?sort=experimentapproveddate_tdt+desc&page=1&searchQuery=MOH_2021-12-08_010449 .

运动网络神经生理(TMS-EEG)标记物作为脑室-腹膜分流持续一年以上的正常压力脑积水预后的预测因子。
背景和目的:目前常压脑积水(NPH)的治疗依赖于临床表现、影像学和各种临床程序来确定是否需要神经外科干预,特别是安装脑室-腹膜分流器(VPS)。本研究旨在评估基于tms -诱发电位(TEP)的评估(Delphi-MD)在预测VPS持续反应(超过一年)方面的效用,作为脑脊液穿刺试验(CTT)的辅助试验。方法:41例可能患有iNPH的患者接受了Delphi-MD波形粘附性评估(WFA),这是一种评估其TEP与理想基准TEP接近程度的综合措施。其中,18名患者接受了基于标准实践的多学科团队决定的VPS治疗,对TEP结果不知情。对干预的反应在一年多的时间里使用临床总体印象变化(CGIC)量表进行评估,此外还使用10米时间up和go测试和修改的Rankin量表进行评估。结果:应答者在基线时(VPS前)的M1L WFA值高于无应答者(中位数0.51 [95% CI 0.36-0.76],中位数0.14 [95% CI -0.02-0.38],分别p = 0.012)。M1L WFA成功区分了应答者(11/18)和无应答者(7/18),ROC-AUC为0.935 [bootstrap 95% CI 0.792-1.00]。结论:本研究表明,通过Delphi-MD (TMS-EEG)获得的更高M1L WFA表明,与VPS持续应答的可能iNPH患者相比,VPS持续应答的iNPH患者运动网络的保存和功能完整性更好。考虑到在未来独立队列中结果的重复性,Delphi-MD有望成为iNPH患者在转介VPS治疗之前的客观、准确和可获得的辅助筛查工具。试验报名:注册号:MOH_2021-12-08_010449。报名日期:11.09.2021。https://clinicaltrial.health.gov.il/clinicaltrials/?sort=experimentapproveddate_tdt + desc&page = 1 &searchquery = MOH_2021-12-08_010449。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS Neuroscience-Developmental Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: "Fluids and Barriers of the CNS" is a scholarly open access journal that specializes in the intricate world of the central nervous system's fluids and barriers, which are pivotal for the health and well-being of the human body. This journal is a peer-reviewed platform that welcomes research manuscripts exploring the full spectrum of CNS fluids and barriers, with a particular focus on their roles in both health and disease. At the heart of this journal's interest is the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), a vital fluid that circulates within the brain and spinal cord, playing a multifaceted role in the normal functioning of the brain and in various neurological conditions. The journal delves into the composition, circulation, and absorption of CSF, as well as its relationship with the parenchymal interstitial fluid and the neurovascular unit at the blood-brain barrier (BBB).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书