Comparison of Drug-Coated Versus Conventional Balloons for the Side Branches of Bifurcation Lesions: OCVC-BIF Study.

IF 7.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Takayuki Ishihara, Tomoharu Dohi, Daisuke Sakamoto, Hirota Kida, Naotaka Okamoto, Atsushi Kikuchi, Tsutomu Kawai, Naoki Mori, Ryu Shutta, Minoru Ichikawa, Yasunori Ueda, Daisuke Nakamura, Toshiaki Mano, Masami Nishino, Tetsuya Watanabe, Yoshiharu Higuchi, Eisuke Hida, Tomoharu Sato, Shungo Hikoso, Daisaku Nakatani, Yohei Sotomi, Yasushi Sakata
{"title":"Comparison of Drug-Coated Versus Conventional Balloons for the Side Branches of Bifurcation Lesions: OCVC-BIF Study.","authors":"Takayuki Ishihara, Tomoharu Dohi, Daisuke Sakamoto, Hirota Kida, Naotaka Okamoto, Atsushi Kikuchi, Tsutomu Kawai, Naoki Mori, Ryu Shutta, Minoru Ichikawa, Yasunori Ueda, Daisuke Nakamura, Toshiaki Mano, Masami Nishino, Tetsuya Watanabe, Yoshiharu Higuchi, Eisuke Hida, Tomoharu Sato, Shungo Hikoso, Daisaku Nakatani, Yohei Sotomi, Yasushi Sakata","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.016424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary bifurcation lesions remain one of the most challenging lesions. In particular, satisfactory clinical outcomes have not yet been achieved for side branches. The use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) has demonstrated acceptable clinical outcomes in native coronary arteries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of additional DCB inflation in the side branches of bifurcation lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The OCVC-BIF study (Comparison of Drug-Coated Versus Conventional Balloons for the Side Branch of Bifurcation Lesions) was conducted as a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. Patients with bifurcation lesions scheduled for drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in the main vessel followed by kissing balloon inflation were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized to receive either additional dilatation of the side branch using a DCB after DES implantation with kissing balloon inflation (DCB group) or only DES implantation with kissing balloon inflation using conventional balloons (non-DCB group). The primary end point was restenosis of the side branch, assessed using scheduled coronary angiography at 9 months or symptom-driven coronary angiography during the 1-year follow-up. Restenosis was defined as ≥50% stenosis of the side branch, determined using 3-dimensional bifurcation quantitative coronary angiography. The key secondary end points included major adverse cardiac events at 12 months, which were defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 299 patients were randomized into the DCB (151 patients) and non-DCB (148 patients) groups between October 2019 and September 2024. Serial 3-dimensional bifurcation quantitative coronary angiography evaluation was performed in 262 (87.6%) patients. The restenosis rate was lower in the DCB group than that in the non-DCB group (8.1% versus 18.3%, <i>P</i>=0.012). However, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 12 months was similar between them (10.1% versus 12.4%, <i>P</i>=0.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Additional DCB inflation in the side branch after main-vessel DES implantation with kissing balloon inflation decreases restenosis in the side branch in the treatment of bifurcation lesions.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs052200077; Unique identifier: jRCTs052200077.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"19 10","pages":"e016424"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.016424","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary bifurcation lesions remain one of the most challenging lesions. In particular, satisfactory clinical outcomes have not yet been achieved for side branches. The use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) has demonstrated acceptable clinical outcomes in native coronary arteries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of additional DCB inflation in the side branches of bifurcation lesions.

Methods: The OCVC-BIF study (Comparison of Drug-Coated Versus Conventional Balloons for the Side Branch of Bifurcation Lesions) was conducted as a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. Patients with bifurcation lesions scheduled for drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in the main vessel followed by kissing balloon inflation were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized to receive either additional dilatation of the side branch using a DCB after DES implantation with kissing balloon inflation (DCB group) or only DES implantation with kissing balloon inflation using conventional balloons (non-DCB group). The primary end point was restenosis of the side branch, assessed using scheduled coronary angiography at 9 months or symptom-driven coronary angiography during the 1-year follow-up. Restenosis was defined as ≥50% stenosis of the side branch, determined using 3-dimensional bifurcation quantitative coronary angiography. The key secondary end points included major adverse cardiac events at 12 months, which were defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis.

Results: In total, 299 patients were randomized into the DCB (151 patients) and non-DCB (148 patients) groups between October 2019 and September 2024. Serial 3-dimensional bifurcation quantitative coronary angiography evaluation was performed in 262 (87.6%) patients. The restenosis rate was lower in the DCB group than that in the non-DCB group (8.1% versus 18.3%, P=0.012). However, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 12 months was similar between them (10.1% versus 12.4%, P=0.58).

Conclusions: Additional DCB inflation in the side branch after main-vessel DES implantation with kissing balloon inflation decreases restenosis in the side branch in the treatment of bifurcation lesions.

Registration: URL: https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs052200077; Unique identifier: jRCTs052200077.

药物包被球囊与常规球囊在分叉病变侧支中的比较:OCVC-BIF研究。
背景:冠状动脉分叉病变仍然是最具挑战性的病变之一。特别是,对于侧支尚未取得满意的临床结果。在原生冠状动脉中使用药物包被球囊(DCBs)已经证明了可接受的临床结果。本研究旨在评估在分叉病变侧支增加DCB膨胀的有效性和安全性。方法:OCVC-BIF研究是一项多中心、随机、开放标签的试验,用于分岔病变侧支的药物包被气球与常规气球的比较。有分叉病变的患者计划在主血管内植入药物洗脱支架(DES),随后进行接吻球囊充气。患者被随机分为两组,一组在接吻气球充气DES植入后使用DCB进行侧支扩张(DCB组),另一组仅使用传统气球进行接吻气球充气DES植入(非DCB组)。主要终点是侧支再狭窄,在9个月时进行冠状动脉造影或在1年随访期间进行症状驱动冠状动脉造影评估。再狭窄定义为侧支狭窄≥50%,采用三维分岔定量冠状动脉造影确定。关键的次要终点包括12个月时的主要心脏不良事件,定义为心源性死亡、心肌梗死、临床驱动的靶病变血运重建和支架血栓形成的复合。结果:在2019年10月至2024年9月期间,299例患者被随机分为DCB组(151例)和非DCB组(148例)。262例(87.6%)患者行连续三维分岔定量冠状动脉造影评估。DCB组再狭窄率低于非DCB组(8.1%比18.3%,P=0.012)。然而,12个月时主要心脏不良事件的发生率相似(10.1%对12.4%,P=0.58)。结论:在主血管DES植入后,在侧支进行额外的DCB膨胀,在治疗分叉病变时可减少侧支再狭窄。注册:网址:https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs052200077;唯一标识符:jRCTs052200077。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书