Glyceamic variability is a pridictor of in-hopital and long-term mortality of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: a 5-year retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yang Liu, Qiwei Shen, Hongyu Liu, Gregory Y H Lip, Kui Hong
{"title":"Glyceamic variability is a pridictor of in-hopital and long-term mortality of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: a 5-year retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Yang Liu, Qiwei Shen, Hongyu Liu, Gregory Y H Lip, Kui Hong","doi":"10.1186/s12872-026-06338-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a major cause of heart failure with high morbidity and mortality, yet reliable prognostic markers remain limited. Glycaemic variability (GV), reflecting fluctuations in glucose levels, has been linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but its role in DCM remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. We included patients with DCM as the primary diagnosis and ≥ 3 glucose measurements during hospitalization. GV was defined as the natural logarithm of the standard deviation-to-mean glucose ratio and analyzed continuously and categorically (GV ≥ 2.9 vs. <2.9). Outcomes included in-hospital, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year all-cause mortalities. Multivariable Cox regression models were adjusted for demographic, clinical, and laboratory covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 580 patients with DCM were included (mean age 64.20 (14.80); 73% male; 55% White). Patients with GV ≥ 2.9 had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (5.6% vs. 0.7%), ICU admission (52% vs. 28%) and worse long-term outcomes, including 1-year (20% vs. 10%), 3-year (26% vs. 17%), and 5-year (29% vs. 19%) mortalities. After adjusting for demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables, Each unit increase in GV increased the risk of in-hospital [adjusted OR(aOR): 5.12, 95% CI: 1.07-31.2], ICU admission (aOR 2.59),1-year [adjusted HR (aHR) 1.84], 3-year (aHR 1.65), and 5-year (aHR 1.60) death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GV is associated with both short- and long-term mortality in patients with DCM. The cohort median GV value of 2.9 might help stratify patients according to clinical risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13685292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06338-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a major cause of heart failure with high morbidity and mortality, yet reliable prognostic markers remain limited. Glycaemic variability (GV), reflecting fluctuations in glucose levels, has been linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but its role in DCM remains uncertain.

Methods: Data were obtained from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. We included patients with DCM as the primary diagnosis and ≥ 3 glucose measurements during hospitalization. GV was defined as the natural logarithm of the standard deviation-to-mean glucose ratio and analyzed continuously and categorically (GV ≥ 2.9 vs. <2.9). Outcomes included in-hospital, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year all-cause mortalities. Multivariable Cox regression models were adjusted for demographic, clinical, and laboratory covariates.

Results: A total of 580 patients with DCM were included (mean age 64.20 (14.80); 73% male; 55% White). Patients with GV ≥ 2.9 had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (5.6% vs. 0.7%), ICU admission (52% vs. 28%) and worse long-term outcomes, including 1-year (20% vs. 10%), 3-year (26% vs. 17%), and 5-year (29% vs. 19%) mortalities. After adjusting for demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables, Each unit increase in GV increased the risk of in-hospital [adjusted OR(aOR): 5.12, 95% CI: 1.07-31.2], ICU admission (aOR 2.59),1-year [adjusted HR (aHR) 1.84], 3-year (aHR 1.65), and 5-year (aHR 1.60) death.

Conclusion: GV is associated with both short- and long-term mortality in patients with DCM. The cohort median GV value of 2.9 might help stratify patients according to clinical risk.

血糖变异性是扩张型心肌病患者住院和长期死亡率的预测指标:一项5年回顾性队列研究。
背景:扩张型心肌病(DCM)是心力衰竭的主要原因,发病率和死亡率高,但可靠的预后指标仍然有限。反映葡萄糖水平波动的血糖变异性(GV)与不良心血管结局有关,但其在DCM中的作用仍不确定。方法:数据来自波士顿Beth Israel Deaconess医疗中心。我们将DCM患者作为主要诊断,并在住院期间进行≥3次血糖测量。GV定义为标准偏差与平均葡萄糖比值的自然对数,并连续分类分析(GV≥2.9 vs.结果:共纳入580例DCM患者(平均年龄64.20岁(14.80岁);男性73%;55%的白人)。GV≥2.9的患者住院死亡率(5.6%比0.7%)、ICU入院率(52%比28%)较高,长期预后较差,包括1年(20%比10%)、3年(26%比17%)和5年(29%比19%)死亡率。在对人口学、临床和实验室变量进行调整后,GV每增加一个单位,住院(调整OR(aOR): 5.12, 95% CI: 1.07-31.2)、ICU入院(aOR 2.59)、1年(调整HR (aHR) 1.84)、3年(aHR 1.65)和5年(aHR 1.60)死亡的风险均增加。结论:GV与DCM患者的短期和长期死亡率相关。2.9的队列GV中位数可能有助于根据临床风险对患者进行分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书