Gold-standard-guided direct preference optimisation for ICD-10-AM and ACHI code assignment from discharge summaries.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Rajvir Kaur, Jeewani Anupama Ginige, Oliver Obst
{"title":"Gold-standard-guided direct preference optimisation for ICD-10-AM and ACHI code assignment from discharge summaries.","authors":"Rajvir Kaur, Jeewani Anupama Ginige, Oliver Obst","doi":"10.1186/s12911-026-03631-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical codes assigned from discharge summaries support clinical research, reimbursement, health resource allocation, and service planning. In Australia, ICD-10-AM and ACHI are used to code diagnoses and interventions for admitted episodes of care, but manual coding is time-consuming, labour-intensive, and subject to variability. This study investigates large language models for automated ICD-10-AM and ACHI code assignment from discharge summaries. We first normalised a public ICD-9-CM coded dataset into the Australian coding system using General Equivalence Mappings and semantic similarity over code descriptions, with validation by a domain expert clinical coder. We then fine-tuned Meta-Llama-3-8B and compared full-parameter fine-tuning with a parameter-efficient QLoRA baseline. Finally, we applied Direct Preference Optimisation (DPO) using gold-standard-guided preference pairs, where the gold-standard ICD-10-AM/ACHI code list was treated as the preferred response and the supervised fine-tuned model output as the non-preferred response. Experiments were conducted on a mapped MIMIC-III subset and a de-identified Australian hospital dataset. Among the evaluated model variants, the DPO-aligned full-parameter model achieved the highest score, with micro-F1 scores of 0.7397 on the mapped dataset and 0.7834 on the Australian hospital dataset. These findings suggest that gold-standard-guided DPO can improve agreement with reference code sets compared with supervised fine-tuning alone. However, the results are limited to high-frequency diagnosis and procedure codes, short-document evaluation settings, and DPO preference pairs reviewed by one annotator.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13685342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-026-03631-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical codes assigned from discharge summaries support clinical research, reimbursement, health resource allocation, and service planning. In Australia, ICD-10-AM and ACHI are used to code diagnoses and interventions for admitted episodes of care, but manual coding is time-consuming, labour-intensive, and subject to variability. This study investigates large language models for automated ICD-10-AM and ACHI code assignment from discharge summaries. We first normalised a public ICD-9-CM coded dataset into the Australian coding system using General Equivalence Mappings and semantic similarity over code descriptions, with validation by a domain expert clinical coder. We then fine-tuned Meta-Llama-3-8B and compared full-parameter fine-tuning with a parameter-efficient QLoRA baseline. Finally, we applied Direct Preference Optimisation (DPO) using gold-standard-guided preference pairs, where the gold-standard ICD-10-AM/ACHI code list was treated as the preferred response and the supervised fine-tuned model output as the non-preferred response. Experiments were conducted on a mapped MIMIC-III subset and a de-identified Australian hospital dataset. Among the evaluated model variants, the DPO-aligned full-parameter model achieved the highest score, with micro-F1 scores of 0.7397 on the mapped dataset and 0.7834 on the Australian hospital dataset. These findings suggest that gold-standard-guided DPO can improve agreement with reference code sets compared with supervised fine-tuning alone. However, the results are limited to high-frequency diagnosis and procedure codes, short-document evaluation settings, and DPO preference pairs reviewed by one annotator.

黄金标准指导的ICD-10-AM和ACHI代码分配的直接优选优化。
从出院摘要中分配的临床代码支持临床研究、报销、卫生资源分配和服务计划。在澳大利亚,ICD-10-AM和ACHI被用于对住院治疗的诊断和干预进行编码,但手工编码是耗时的,劳动密集型的,并且受可变性的影响。本研究探讨了从出院摘要中自动分配ICD-10-AM和ACHI代码的大型语言模型。我们首先使用通用等价映射和代码描述的语义相似性将公共ICD-9-CM编码数据集归一化到澳大利亚编码系统中,并由领域专家临床编码人员进行验证。然后,我们对meta - lama-3- 8b进行了微调,并将全参数微调与参数高效的QLoRA基线进行了比较。最后,我们使用金标准引导的偏好对应用直接偏好优化(DPO),其中金标准ICD-10-AM/ACHI代码列表被视为首选响应,监督微调模型输出被视为非首选响应。实验是在映射的MIMIC-III子集和去识别的澳大利亚医院数据集上进行的。在评估的模型变体中,DPO-aligned全参数模型得分最高,在映射数据集上的micro-F1得分为0.7397,在澳大利亚医院数据集上的micro-F1得分为0.7834。这些发现表明,与单独的监督微调相比,金标准引导的DPO可以提高与参考代码集的一致性。然而,结果仅限于高频诊断和程序代码,短文档评估设置,以及由一个注释者审查的DPO偏好对。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书