A survey of explainable AI applications in infectious disease diagnosis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hossein Valishirin, Fatemeh Inanloo S A, Kelly A Brayton, Shira L Broschat
{"title":"A survey of explainable AI applications in infectious disease diagnosis.","authors":"Hossein Valishirin, Fatemeh Inanloo S A, Kelly A Brayton, Shira L Broschat","doi":"10.1186/s12879-026-14018-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, has shown significant promise in accelerating the diagnosis of infectious diseases. However, the inherent \"black box\" nature of deep learning is a major barrier to clinical adoption, preventing trust and accountability. Explainable AI (XAI) tries to address this problem by adding transparency to model decision-making. This paper presents a comprehensive scoping review of XAI applications in infectious disease diagnosis based on literature published between 2023 and 2025. We review studies of major diseases, including COVID-19, tuberculosis, malaria, monkeypox, and dengue, categorizing them by data modality (e.g., imaging, tabular) and the XAI techniques employed (e.g., SHAP, LIME, Grad-CAM). We conclude that XAI methods are effective in identifying clinically relevant features, such as key biomarkers from lab results and pathological regions in medical images, thereby aligning model reasoning with established clinical knowledge. Despite this progress, significant challenges persist, including poor generalizability from small, single-center datasets, the computational overhead of post-hoc methods, and a gap between technical explanations and clinical utility. We outline future directions that should be taken, including the need for standardized evaluation metrics, multi-center validation, and clinician-centered XAI design to facilitate the responsible integration of AI into clinical practice.Clinical trial numberNot applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-026-14018-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, has shown significant promise in accelerating the diagnosis of infectious diseases. However, the inherent "black box" nature of deep learning is a major barrier to clinical adoption, preventing trust and accountability. Explainable AI (XAI) tries to address this problem by adding transparency to model decision-making. This paper presents a comprehensive scoping review of XAI applications in infectious disease diagnosis based on literature published between 2023 and 2025. We review studies of major diseases, including COVID-19, tuberculosis, malaria, monkeypox, and dengue, categorizing them by data modality (e.g., imaging, tabular) and the XAI techniques employed (e.g., SHAP, LIME, Grad-CAM). We conclude that XAI methods are effective in identifying clinically relevant features, such as key biomarkers from lab results and pathological regions in medical images, thereby aligning model reasoning with established clinical knowledge. Despite this progress, significant challenges persist, including poor generalizability from small, single-center datasets, the computational overhead of post-hoc methods, and a gap between technical explanations and clinical utility. We outline future directions that should be taken, including the need for standardized evaluation metrics, multi-center validation, and clinician-centered XAI design to facilitate the responsible integration of AI into clinical practice.Clinical trial numberNot applicable.

可解释人工智能在传染病诊断中的应用综述。
人工智能(AI),特别是深度学习,在加速传染病诊断方面显示出巨大的希望。然而,深度学习固有的“黑箱”性质是临床应用的主要障碍,阻碍了信任和问责制。可解释AI (XAI)试图通过增加模型决策的透明度来解决这个问题。本文根据2023年至2025年期间发表的文献,对XAI在传染病诊断中的应用进行了全面的综述。我们回顾了主要疾病的研究,包括COVID-19、结核病、疟疾、猴痘和登革热,并根据数据方式(如成像、表格)和采用的XAI技术(如SHAP、LIME、gradi - cam)对它们进行了分类。我们得出结论,XAI方法在识别临床相关特征方面是有效的,例如实验室结果中的关键生物标志物和医学图像中的病理区域,从而使模型推理与既定的临床知识保持一致。尽管取得了这些进展,但仍然存在重大挑战,包括小型单中心数据集的泛化性差,事后方法的计算开销以及技术解释与临床应用之间的差距。我们概述了未来应该采取的方向,包括标准化评估指标的需求、多中心验证和以临床医生为中心的XAI设计,以促进人工智能与临床实践的负责任整合。临床试验编号不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书