Validation of a Rapid Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification-Based Test for the Detection of Shigella from Rectal Swab.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Farina Naz, Sampa Dash, Eva Sultana, Mohammad Ali, Shaniram Das, Md Razibur Rahman, Tahmeed Ahmed, Asg Faruque, Subhra Chakraborty
{"title":"Validation of a Rapid Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification-Based Test for the Detection of Shigella from Rectal Swab.","authors":"Farina Naz, Sampa Dash, Eva Sultana, Mohammad Ali, Shaniram Das, Md Razibur Rahman, Tahmeed Ahmed, Asg Faruque, Subhra Chakraborty","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.26-0232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid loop-mediated isothermal amplification-based diagnostic test (RLDT) has been validated as a simple, sensitive, and rapid tool for detecting Shigella spp. from fresh or frozen stool. When stool is unavailable or difficult to transport, rectal swabs (RSs) in Cary-Blair medium, stool collected in buffered glycerol saline (BGS), or stool-dipped swabs (SDSs) in Cary-Blair medium offer alternatives that can be easily collected and transported without maintaining a cold chain. This study evaluated the performance of RLDTs for detecting Shigella spp. from RSs, stool collected in BGS, and SDSs compared with fresh stool (FS). Paired RSs and FS were collected from 105 children younger than 5 years old at two hospitals in Bangladesh. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were determined along with the agreement between assays using kappa statistics. The RLDTs detected Shigella in approximately 38-40% of samples across all sample types. Rectal swabs in Cary-Blair medium and SDS each showed 97.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with PPVs of 100% and NPVs of 98.5% (RSs) and 98.4% (SDSs) compared with FS; stool collected in BGS samples demonstrated the highest sensitivity (100%) and NPV (100%), with 98.4% specificity and 97.6% PPV. All alternative specimen types showed almost perfect agreement with FS. The RLDT performed well using RSs, indicating a practical alternative to stool for detecting Shigella. The assay was also reliable with stool collected in BGS and SDSs. Broader adoption of RLDTs could improve diagnostic capacity and strengthen surveillance and control efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7752,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.26-0232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid loop-mediated isothermal amplification-based diagnostic test (RLDT) has been validated as a simple, sensitive, and rapid tool for detecting Shigella spp. from fresh or frozen stool. When stool is unavailable or difficult to transport, rectal swabs (RSs) in Cary-Blair medium, stool collected in buffered glycerol saline (BGS), or stool-dipped swabs (SDSs) in Cary-Blair medium offer alternatives that can be easily collected and transported without maintaining a cold chain. This study evaluated the performance of RLDTs for detecting Shigella spp. from RSs, stool collected in BGS, and SDSs compared with fresh stool (FS). Paired RSs and FS were collected from 105 children younger than 5 years old at two hospitals in Bangladesh. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were determined along with the agreement between assays using kappa statistics. The RLDTs detected Shigella in approximately 38-40% of samples across all sample types. Rectal swabs in Cary-Blair medium and SDS each showed 97.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with PPVs of 100% and NPVs of 98.5% (RSs) and 98.4% (SDSs) compared with FS; stool collected in BGS samples demonstrated the highest sensitivity (100%) and NPV (100%), with 98.4% specificity and 97.6% PPV. All alternative specimen types showed almost perfect agreement with FS. The RLDT performed well using RSs, indicating a practical alternative to stool for detecting Shigella. The assay was also reliable with stool collected in BGS and SDSs. Broader adoption of RLDTs could improve diagnostic capacity and strengthen surveillance and control efforts.

基于快速环介导等温扩增的直肠拭子志贺氏菌检测方法的验证。
快速环介导等温扩增诊断试验(RLDT)已被证实是一种简单、灵敏、快速的从新鲜或冷冻粪便中检测志贺氏菌的工具。当无法获得粪便或难以运输时,直肠拭子(RSs)在凯里-布莱尔培养基中,在缓冲甘油生理盐水(BGS)中收集的粪便,或粪便沾拭子(sds)在凯里-布莱尔培养基中提供替代方案,可以很容易地收集和运输,而无需维持冷链。本研究评估了RLDTs在RSs、BGS收集的粪便和sds中检测志贺氏菌的性能,并与新鲜粪便(FS)进行了比较。从孟加拉国两家医院的105名5岁以下儿童中收集了配对的RSs和FS。敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性,以及使用kappa统计测定法之间的一致性。RLDTs在所有样本类型中约38-40%的样本中检测到志贺氏菌。直肠拭子在Cary-Blair培养基和SDS中的敏感性和特异性分别为97.6%和100%,与FS相比,PPVs为100%,npv为98.5% (RSs)和98.4% (SDS);BGS样本中收集的粪便灵敏度最高(100%),NPV(100%),特异性为98.4%,PPV为97.6%。所有替代的标本类型与FS几乎完全一致。RLDT使用RSs表现良好,表明粪便检测志贺氏菌的实用替代方法。该方法对BGS和sds收集的粪便也是可靠的。更广泛地采用RLDTs可以提高诊断能力并加强监测和控制工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, established in 1921, is published monthly by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It is among the top-ranked tropical medicine journals in the world publishing original scientific articles and the latest science covering new research with an emphasis on population, clinical and laboratory science and the application of technology in the fields of tropical medicine, parasitology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, basic and molecular biology, virology and international medicine. The Journal publishes unsolicited peer-reviewed manuscripts, review articles, short reports, images in Clinical Tropical Medicine, case studies, reports on the efficacy of new drugs and methods of treatment, prevention and control methodologies,new testing methods and equipment, book reports and Letters to the Editor. Topics range from applied epidemiology in such relevant areas as AIDS to the molecular biology of vaccine development. The Journal is of interest to epidemiologists, parasitologists, virologists, clinicians, entomologists and public health officials who are concerned with health issues of the tropics, developing nations and emerging infectious diseases. Major granting institutions including philanthropic and governmental institutions active in the public health field, and medical and scientific libraries throughout the world purchase the Journal. Two or more supplements to the Journal on topics of special interest are published annually. These supplements represent comprehensive and multidisciplinary discussions of issues of concern to tropical disease specialists and health issues of developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书