Plant-based dietary patterns and frailty in older adults: a multicohort longitudinal study with within-between decomposition and network analysis

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
{"title":"Plant-based dietary patterns and frailty in older adults: a multicohort longitudinal study with within-between decomposition and network analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afag304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\"><div class=\"boxTitle\">Objective</div>Plant-based dietary patterns may influence healthy ageing, but their longitudinal and multidimensional associations with frailty remain unclear. We examined these associations across three primary ageing cohorts and explored links between dietary components and frailty domains.<div class=\"boxTitle\">Methods</div>The primary sample included 8628 older adults from Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Overall, healthful and unhealthful plant-based diet indices (PDIs, hPDIs and uPDIs) were derived from cohort-specific food-group data. A supplementary analysis of 10 821 SHARE participants used a two-component plant–animal contrast. Frailty was assessed using a multidomain deficit-accumulation index. Generalised linear mixed models examined diet–frailty associations, and Mundlak decomposition separated between-person differences from within-person changes where repeated diet data were available. Spline and network analyses examined non-linearity and component-level associations.<div class=\"boxTitle\">Results</div>Higher PDI was associated with lower frailty risk across all three primary cohorts (ORs = 0.71–0.80), whereas higher uPDI was associated with higher risk (ORs = 1.24–1.41). hPDI was inversely associated only in ELSA and was null in CLHLS and HRS. In CLHLS, between-person dietary differences showed stronger associations than within-person changes. Spline analysis provided limited evidence of non-linearity. Network analyses highlighted nuts, vegetables and plant oils as showing predominantly inverse associations with several frailty domains. SHARE analysis showed an inverse between-person association, no within-person association, with the plant-based component also showing predominantly inverse links with frailty domains.<div class=\"boxTitle\">Conclusion</div>Higher overall plant-based diet scores were associated with lower frailty risk, whereas unhealthful plant-based diets were associated with higher risk, underscoring the importance of diet quality.</span>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective
Plant-based dietary patterns may influence healthy ageing, but their longitudinal and multidimensional associations with frailty remain unclear. We examined these associations across three primary ageing cohorts and explored links between dietary components and frailty domains.
Methods
The primary sample included 8628 older adults from Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Overall, healthful and unhealthful plant-based diet indices (PDIs, hPDIs and uPDIs) were derived from cohort-specific food-group data. A supplementary analysis of 10 821 SHARE participants used a two-component plant–animal contrast. Frailty was assessed using a multidomain deficit-accumulation index. Generalised linear mixed models examined diet–frailty associations, and Mundlak decomposition separated between-person differences from within-person changes where repeated diet data were available. Spline and network analyses examined non-linearity and component-level associations.
Results
Higher PDI was associated with lower frailty risk across all three primary cohorts (ORs = 0.71–0.80), whereas higher uPDI was associated with higher risk (ORs = 1.24–1.41). hPDI was inversely associated only in ELSA and was null in CLHLS and HRS. In CLHLS, between-person dietary differences showed stronger associations than within-person changes. Spline analysis provided limited evidence of non-linearity. Network analyses highlighted nuts, vegetables and plant oils as showing predominantly inverse associations with several frailty domains. SHARE analysis showed an inverse between-person association, no within-person association, with the plant-based component also showing predominantly inverse links with frailty domains.
Conclusion
Higher overall plant-based diet scores were associated with lower frailty risk, whereas unhealthful plant-based diets were associated with higher risk, underscoring the importance of diet quality.
以植物为基础的饮食模式和老年人的虚弱:一项多队列纵向研究,中间分解和网络分析
目的:植物性饮食模式可能影响健康老龄化,但其与虚弱的纵向和多维关联尚不清楚。我们在三个主要的衰老队列中检查了这些关联,并探索了饮食成分与脆弱领域之间的联系。方法主要研究对象为来自中国健康长寿纵向调查(CLHLS)、健康与退休研究(HRS)和英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的8628名老年人。总体而言,健康和不健康的植物性饮食指数(pdi, hpdi和uPDIs)来自特定人群的食物组数据。对10821名SHARE参与者的补充分析使用了双组分植物-动物对比。使用多域缺陷积累指数评估脆弱性。广义线性混合模型检验了饮食与脆弱之间的联系,蒙德拉克分解将人与人之间的差异与可获得重复饮食数据的个人内部变化分离开来。样条和网络分析检验了非线性和组件级关联。在所有三个主要队列中,较高的PDI与较低的衰弱风险相关(or = 0.71-0.80),而较高的uPDI与较高的风险相关(or = 1.24-1.41)。hPDI仅在ELSA中呈负相关,在CLHLS和HRS中为零。在CLHLS中,人与人之间的饮食差异比人与人之间的变化表现出更强的相关性。样条分析提供了有限的非线性证据。网络分析强调了坚果、蔬菜和植物油与几个脆弱域的主要负相关。SHARE分析显示人与人之间呈负相关,而人与人之间无关联,基于植物的成分也显示出与脆弱域主要呈负相关。结论较高的植物性饮食总分与较低的衰弱风险相关,而不健康的植物性饮食与较高的风险相关,强调了饮食质量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书