Perioperative analgesic effects of opiranserin in canine castration: a pilot study.

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Pub Date : 2026-10-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fvets.2026.1954078
Seongwon Lee, Seonbin Oh, Inhyung Lee, Won-Gyun Son
{"title":"Perioperative analgesic effects of opiranserin in canine castration: a pilot study.","authors":"Seongwon Lee, Seonbin Oh, Inhyung Lee, Won-Gyun Son","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2026.1954078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Opiranserin, a non-opioid analgesic acting as a glycine transporter 2 inhibitor and 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, was evaluated for reducing intraoperative rescue analgesia and postoperative pain in dogs undergoing castration under isoflurane anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eight healthy male Beagle dogs were randomized to receive a continuous rate infusion of opiranserin (5 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>·h<sup>-1</sup> for 1 h before induction, then 0.33 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>·h<sup>-1</sup> for 9 h; <i>n</i> = 4) or 0.9% saline (<i>n</i> = 4). Anesthesia was induced with alfaxalone and maintained with isoflurane (1.5% end-tidal); all dogs received meloxicam and cefazolin preoperatively, without locoregional analgesia. Hemodynamic responses (ΔMAP, ΔHR) were recorded across 11 surgical events; rescue remifentanil was given when both increased ≥20% from baseline. Postoperative pain was scored with the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale-Short Form (GCMPS-SF) from 30 min after extubation (T0) through T7, with rescue analgesia at scores ≥5. Primary outcomes were intraoperative rescue analgesia frequency and postoperative GCMPS-SF scores; secondary outcomes were intraoperative hemodynamic responses, postoperative rescue consumption, and adverse effects. Data were analyzed with Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests and linear mixed models with Bonferroni-adjusted comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The opiranserin group required fewer intraoperative rescue interventions than the normal saline group (median 2 [2-2] vs. 6.5 [3-9]; <i>p</i> = 0.021). GCMPS-SF scores showed significant effects of group (<i>p</i> = 0.030), time (<i>p</i> = 0.047), and group × time interaction (<i>p</i> = 0.034), with lower scores in the opiranserin group at T1 (adjusted <i>p</i> = 0.012) but not at other time points. Among secondary outcomes, significant overall effects of group were found for ΔMAP (<i>p</i> = 0.011) and ΔHR (<i>p</i> = 0.048), and of surgical event for both (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.008), with no group × event interaction; no individual event differed significantly after correction. Cumulative postoperative rescue analgesic consumption and the incidence of adverse effects did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These preliminary findings suggest that opiranserin may reduce intraoperative rescue analgesia requirements and attenuate postoperative pain in dogs, warranting confirmation in larger trials. The absence of significant adverse effects is reassuring but should be interpreted cautiously given the small sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"13 ","pages":"1954078"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13677503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2026.1954078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Opiranserin, a non-opioid analgesic acting as a glycine transporter 2 inhibitor and 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, was evaluated for reducing intraoperative rescue analgesia and postoperative pain in dogs undergoing castration under isoflurane anesthesia.

Materials and methods: Eight healthy male Beagle dogs were randomized to receive a continuous rate infusion of opiranserin (5 mg·kg-1·h-1 for 1 h before induction, then 0.33 mg·kg-1·h-1 for 9 h; n = 4) or 0.9% saline (n = 4). Anesthesia was induced with alfaxalone and maintained with isoflurane (1.5% end-tidal); all dogs received meloxicam and cefazolin preoperatively, without locoregional analgesia. Hemodynamic responses (ΔMAP, ΔHR) were recorded across 11 surgical events; rescue remifentanil was given when both increased ≥20% from baseline. Postoperative pain was scored with the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale-Short Form (GCMPS-SF) from 30 min after extubation (T0) through T7, with rescue analgesia at scores ≥5. Primary outcomes were intraoperative rescue analgesia frequency and postoperative GCMPS-SF scores; secondary outcomes were intraoperative hemodynamic responses, postoperative rescue consumption, and adverse effects. Data were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U tests and linear mixed models with Bonferroni-adjusted comparisons.

Results: The opiranserin group required fewer intraoperative rescue interventions than the normal saline group (median 2 [2-2] vs. 6.5 [3-9]; p = 0.021). GCMPS-SF scores showed significant effects of group (p = 0.030), time (p = 0.047), and group × time interaction (p = 0.034), with lower scores in the opiranserin group at T1 (adjusted p = 0.012) but not at other time points. Among secondary outcomes, significant overall effects of group were found for ΔMAP (p = 0.011) and ΔHR (p = 0.048), and of surgical event for both (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008), with no group × event interaction; no individual event differed significantly after correction. Cumulative postoperative rescue analgesic consumption and the incidence of adverse effects did not differ between groups.

Conclusion: These preliminary findings suggest that opiranserin may reduce intraoperative rescue analgesia requirements and attenuate postoperative pain in dogs, warranting confirmation in larger trials. The absence of significant adverse effects is reassuring but should be interpreted cautiously given the small sample size.

奥iranserin在犬去势术中的围手术期镇痛作用:一项初步研究。
简介:本研究评价了异氟醚麻醉下阉割犬术中抢救镇痛和术后疼痛的减轻作用,Opiranserin是一种非阿片类镇痛药,作为甘氨酸转运蛋白2抑制剂和5-HT2A受体拮抗剂。材料与方法:选取健康雄性Beagle犬8只,在诱导前连续注射奥iranserin (5 mg·kg-1·h-1,诱导前1 h,诱导后0.33 mg·kg-1·h-1,诱导后9 h, n = 4)或0.9%生理盐水(n = 4)。麻醉由甲氧嘧啶诱导,异氟醚维持(1.5%末潮);所有犬术前均给予美洛昔康和头孢唑林,无局部镇痛。记录11个手术事件的血流动力学反应(ΔMAP, ΔHR);当两者较基线增加≥20%时给予瑞芬太尼抢救。术后从拔管后30分钟(T0)到T7,用格拉斯哥复合测量疼痛量表-短表(GCMPS-SF)对疼痛进行评分,急救镇痛评分≥5分。主要结局为术中抢救镇痛频率和术后GCMPS-SF评分;次要结果是术中血流动力学反应、术后抢救消耗和不良反应。数据分析采用Mann-Whitney U检验和bonferroni校正比较的线性混合模型。结果:奥iranserin组术中需要的抢救干预少于生理盐水组(中位数2 [2-2]vs. 6.5 [3-9]; p = 0.021)。GCMPS-SF评分有组(p = 0.030)、时间(p = 0.047)和组×时间交互作用(p = 0.034)的显著影响,opiranserin组在T1(调整p = 0.012)时评分较低,而在其他时间点评分无显著差异。在次要结局中,ΔMAP (p = 0.011)和ΔHR (p = 0.048)以及手术事件(p < 0.001和p = 0.008)的组间总体效果显著,无组间事件交互作用;校正后,个体事件无显著差异。术后抢救镇痛药的累计用量和不良反应发生率在两组间无差异。结论:这些初步研究结果表明,奥iranserin可以减少犬术中抢救镇痛需求,减轻术后疼痛,值得在更大规模的试验中证实。没有明显的不良反应是令人放心的,但考虑到样本量小,应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1870
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy. Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field. Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书