Optimal surgical timing for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction to minimize osteoarthritis incidence: A systematic review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Fabriccio J Visconti-Lopez, Diego J Aparcana-Granda, Edwin F Mio-Rodriguez, Amir F Orihuela-Orrego, Diego Alejandro Maticorena Quevedo, Akram Hernández-Vásquez
{"title":"Optimal surgical timing for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction to minimize osteoarthritis incidence: A systematic review.","authors":"Fabriccio J Visconti-Lopez, Diego J Aparcana-Granda, Edwin F Mio-Rodriguez, Amir F Orihuela-Orrego, Diego Alejandro Maticorena Quevedo, Akram Hernández-Vásquez","doi":"10.1007/s11845-026-04650-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common cause of knee instability and may contribute to the development of osteoarthritis (OA). Whether the timing of ACL reconstruction influences the subsequent risk of OA remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the incidence of OA and secondary knee complications following early versus delayed ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. The review was reported according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing OA incidence after early versus delayed ACL reconstruction were eligible. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the RoB 2 tool, as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies involving 1,659 patients were included. Definitions of early and delayed ACL reconstruction varied across studies. Follow-up ranged from 5 to 17.5 years, and the reported incidence of OA ranged from 2% to 49%, with heterogeneous assessment methods, including radiographic grading and patient-reported outcome measures. Delayed reconstruction was associated with a higher incidence of secondary meniscal injuries and subsequent meniscectomies. Total knee arthroplasty rates were also higher in delayed reconstruction groups, reaching 10.9%, compared with up to 0.2% in early reconstruction groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early ACL reconstruction may be associated with fewer secondary knee complications, particularly meniscal injuries, meniscectomies, and subsequent knee arthroplasty. However, substantial heterogeneity in the definitions of surgical timing, OA assessment methods, and follow-up duration limits the certainty of these findings. Further studies using standardized definitions and outcome measures are needed to determine the optimal timing of ACL reconstruction for reducing long-term OA risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-026-04650-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common cause of knee instability and may contribute to the development of osteoarthritis (OA). Whether the timing of ACL reconstruction influences the subsequent risk of OA remains uncertain.

Objective: To compare the incidence of OA and secondary knee complications following early versus delayed ACL reconstruction.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. The review was reported according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing OA incidence after early versus delayed ACL reconstruction were eligible. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the RoB 2 tool, as appropriate.

Results: Five studies involving 1,659 patients were included. Definitions of early and delayed ACL reconstruction varied across studies. Follow-up ranged from 5 to 17.5 years, and the reported incidence of OA ranged from 2% to 49%, with heterogeneous assessment methods, including radiographic grading and patient-reported outcome measures. Delayed reconstruction was associated with a higher incidence of secondary meniscal injuries and subsequent meniscectomies. Total knee arthroplasty rates were also higher in delayed reconstruction groups, reaching 10.9%, compared with up to 0.2% in early reconstruction groups.

Conclusions: Early ACL reconstruction may be associated with fewer secondary knee complications, particularly meniscal injuries, meniscectomies, and subsequent knee arthroplasty. However, substantial heterogeneity in the definitions of surgical timing, OA assessment methods, and follow-up duration limits the certainty of these findings. Further studies using standardized definitions and outcome measures are needed to determine the optimal timing of ACL reconstruction for reducing long-term OA risk.

最佳手术时机前交叉韧带重建,以减少骨关节炎的发病率:系统回顾。
背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤是膝关节不稳定的常见原因,并可能导致骨关节炎(OA)的发展。ACL重建的时机是否影响骨关节炎的后续风险仍不确定。目的:比较早期和延迟前交叉韧带重建后OA和继发膝关节并发症的发生率。方法:系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science和Scopus。该审查是根据PRISMA 2020指南报告的。比较早期与延迟前交叉韧带重建后OA发病率的随机对照试验和队列研究是合格的。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和RoB 2工具评估方法学质量和偏倚风险。结果:纳入5项研究,共1659例患者。早期和延迟ACL重建的定义在不同的研究中有所不同。随访时间从5年到17.5年不等,报告的OA发病率从2%到49%不等,采用了不同的评估方法,包括影像学评分和患者报告的结果测量。延迟重建与继发性半月板损伤和随后的半月板切除术的发生率较高相关。延迟重建组的全膝关节置换率也更高,达到10.9%,而早期重建组高达0.2%。结论:早期前交叉韧带重建可能与较少的继发性膝关节并发症相关,特别是半月板损伤、半月板切除术和随后的膝关节置换术。然而,在手术时间、OA评估方法和随访时间的定义上的巨大异质性限制了这些发现的确定性。需要进一步研究使用标准化的定义和结果测量来确定ACL重建的最佳时机,以降低长期OA风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书