{"title":"From validation to public health impact: implementing equitable AI-enabled diabetic retinopathy screening.","authors":"Jing Chen, Bin Chen","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2026.1976572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains a preventable cause of vision loss as diabetes prevalence rises worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled retinal screening has progressed from retrospective validation to prospective and real-world deployment, with recent reviews showing high diagnostic performance across fundus photography, smartphone-based systems, and autonomous platforms. Yet diagnostic accuracy alone does not ensure public health benefit. Population impact can be lost when eligible people are not reached, images are ungradable, results are delayed, referrals are incomplete, treatment capacity is insufficient, or disadvantaged groups face financial, geographic, or digital barriers. Unlike reviews centered mainly on diagnostic accuracy or economic performance, this Mini Review reframes AI-enabled DR screening as a population-health intervention spanning detection through completion of effective eye care. We synthesize evidence on diagnostic validity, implementation, economics, referral completion, care cascades, patient-centered outcomes, equity, and governance. We argue that effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are properties of the complete screening-to-treatment pathway, not the algorithm alone, and propose a four-domain framework encompassing technical validity, service integration, population impact, and equity and sustainability. Future research should prioritize comparative implementation studies and outcome sets that capture screening reach, gradability, referral completion, treatment initiation, time to treatment, avoidable vision loss, vision-related quality of life, acceptability, costs, and subgroup equity. The policy question is no longer whether AI can detect DR, but whether health systems can translate automated detection into equitable completion of effective eye care at scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"1976572"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13678296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1976572","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains a preventable cause of vision loss as diabetes prevalence rises worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled retinal screening has progressed from retrospective validation to prospective and real-world deployment, with recent reviews showing high diagnostic performance across fundus photography, smartphone-based systems, and autonomous platforms. Yet diagnostic accuracy alone does not ensure public health benefit. Population impact can be lost when eligible people are not reached, images are ungradable, results are delayed, referrals are incomplete, treatment capacity is insufficient, or disadvantaged groups face financial, geographic, or digital barriers. Unlike reviews centered mainly on diagnostic accuracy or economic performance, this Mini Review reframes AI-enabled DR screening as a population-health intervention spanning detection through completion of effective eye care. We synthesize evidence on diagnostic validity, implementation, economics, referral completion, care cascades, patient-centered outcomes, equity, and governance. We argue that effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are properties of the complete screening-to-treatment pathway, not the algorithm alone, and propose a four-domain framework encompassing technical validity, service integration, population impact, and equity and sustainability. Future research should prioritize comparative implementation studies and outcome sets that capture screening reach, gradability, referral completion, treatment initiation, time to treatment, avoidable vision loss, vision-related quality of life, acceptability, costs, and subgroup equity. The policy question is no longer whether AI can detect DR, but whether health systems can translate automated detection into equitable completion of effective eye care at scale.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice.
Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.