From validation to public health impact: implementing equitable AI-enabled diabetic retinopathy screening.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2026-10-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1976572
Jing Chen, Bin Chen
{"title":"From validation to public health impact: implementing equitable AI-enabled diabetic retinopathy screening.","authors":"Jing Chen, Bin Chen","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2026.1976572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains a preventable cause of vision loss as diabetes prevalence rises worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled retinal screening has progressed from retrospective validation to prospective and real-world deployment, with recent reviews showing high diagnostic performance across fundus photography, smartphone-based systems, and autonomous platforms. Yet diagnostic accuracy alone does not ensure public health benefit. Population impact can be lost when eligible people are not reached, images are ungradable, results are delayed, referrals are incomplete, treatment capacity is insufficient, or disadvantaged groups face financial, geographic, or digital barriers. Unlike reviews centered mainly on diagnostic accuracy or economic performance, this Mini Review reframes AI-enabled DR screening as a population-health intervention spanning detection through completion of effective eye care. We synthesize evidence on diagnostic validity, implementation, economics, referral completion, care cascades, patient-centered outcomes, equity, and governance. We argue that effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are properties of the complete screening-to-treatment pathway, not the algorithm alone, and propose a four-domain framework encompassing technical validity, service integration, population impact, and equity and sustainability. Future research should prioritize comparative implementation studies and outcome sets that capture screening reach, gradability, referral completion, treatment initiation, time to treatment, avoidable vision loss, vision-related quality of life, acceptability, costs, and subgroup equity. The policy question is no longer whether AI can detect DR, but whether health systems can translate automated detection into equitable completion of effective eye care at scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"1976572"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13678296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1976572","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains a preventable cause of vision loss as diabetes prevalence rises worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled retinal screening has progressed from retrospective validation to prospective and real-world deployment, with recent reviews showing high diagnostic performance across fundus photography, smartphone-based systems, and autonomous platforms. Yet diagnostic accuracy alone does not ensure public health benefit. Population impact can be lost when eligible people are not reached, images are ungradable, results are delayed, referrals are incomplete, treatment capacity is insufficient, or disadvantaged groups face financial, geographic, or digital barriers. Unlike reviews centered mainly on diagnostic accuracy or economic performance, this Mini Review reframes AI-enabled DR screening as a population-health intervention spanning detection through completion of effective eye care. We synthesize evidence on diagnostic validity, implementation, economics, referral completion, care cascades, patient-centered outcomes, equity, and governance. We argue that effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are properties of the complete screening-to-treatment pathway, not the algorithm alone, and propose a four-domain framework encompassing technical validity, service integration, population impact, and equity and sustainability. Future research should prioritize comparative implementation studies and outcome sets that capture screening reach, gradability, referral completion, treatment initiation, time to treatment, avoidable vision loss, vision-related quality of life, acceptability, costs, and subgroup equity. The policy question is no longer whether AI can detect DR, but whether health systems can translate automated detection into equitable completion of effective eye care at scale.

从验证到公共卫生影响:实施公平的人工智能糖尿病视网膜病变筛查。
随着全球糖尿病患病率的上升,糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)仍然是一种可预防的视力丧失原因。支持人工智能(AI)的视网膜筛查已经从回顾性验证发展到前瞻性和现实世界的部署,最近的综述显示,在眼底摄影、基于智能手机的系统和自主平台上,人工智能的诊断性能都很高。然而,仅凭诊断的准确性并不能确保公共卫生受益。如果没有覆盖到符合条件的人群,图像无法分级,结果延迟,转诊不完整,治疗能力不足,或弱势群体面临财政、地理或数字障碍,则可能失去对人口的影响。与主要以诊断准确性或经济表现为中心的综述不同,本迷你综述将人工智能支持的DR筛查重新定义为一种跨越检测到完成有效眼部护理的人群健康干预措施。我们综合了诊断有效性、实施、经济、转诊完成、护理级联、以患者为中心的结果、公平性和治理方面的证据。我们认为,有效性和成本效益是完整的筛选到治疗途径的属性,而不仅仅是算法,并提出了一个包括技术有效性、服务整合、人口影响、公平性和可持续性的四域框架。未来的研究应优先考虑比较实施研究和结果集,包括筛查范围、可分级性、转诊完成情况、治疗开始、治疗时间、可避免的视力丧失、视力相关的生活质量、可接受性、成本和亚组公平性。政策问题不再是人工智能是否可以检测DR,而是卫生系统是否可以将自动检测转化为公平完成有效的大规模眼科护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书