Clinical efficacy and prognostic factors of regenerative endodontic procedure for immature permanent teeth with periapical periodontitis.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2026-10-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2026.1945140
Huan Jiang, Siyu Bai, Ping Chen
{"title":"Clinical efficacy and prognostic factors of regenerative endodontic procedure for immature permanent teeth with periapical periodontitis.","authors":"Huan Jiang, Siyu Bai, Ping Chen","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2026.1945140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical effects of regenerative endodontic procedures in the treatment of immature permanent teeth with periapical periodontitis and to analyze the factors influencing prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data of 148 immature permanent teeth with periapical periodontitis treated at our hospital from January 2022 to December 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were equally divided into Group A (regenerative endodontic procedure, <i>n</i> = 74) and Group B (apexification, <i>n</i> = 74). Clinical efficacy, root development, periodontal parameters, gingival crevicular fluid VEGF levels, and complication rates were compared. All subjects underwent 6-month follow-up and were stratified into good and poor prognosis subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to screen for prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 6 months of therapy, Group A achieved a superior overall response rate, thicker root canal walls, longer root lengths, lower SBI, PLI, and PD, elevated gingival crevicular fluid bFGF and VEGF levels, and fewer complications (<i>P</i> < 0.05). All participants completed the 6-month follow-up and were categorized into poor-prognosis (<i>n</i> = 26) and good-prognosis (<i>n</i> = 122) cohorts. The poor-prognosis group had fewer regenerative endodontic procedure cases and larger apical lesion areas (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified treatment modality and apical lesion size as independent risk factors for an unfavorable prognosis (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regenerative endodontic procedures are associated with favorable short-term (6-month) outcomes in immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis, including improved root development and repair, a more favorable periodontal microenvironment, increased levels of repair-related cytokines, and fewer complications. The treatment modality and extent of the apical lesion were associated with prognosis. Individualized treatment decisions should consider the apical lesion characteristics and clinical status of the affected tooth to optimize outcomes in pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"13 ","pages":"1945140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13677467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1945140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical effects of regenerative endodontic procedures in the treatment of immature permanent teeth with periapical periodontitis and to analyze the factors influencing prognosis.

Methods: Clinical data of 148 immature permanent teeth with periapical periodontitis treated at our hospital from January 2022 to December 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were equally divided into Group A (regenerative endodontic procedure, n = 74) and Group B (apexification, n = 74). Clinical efficacy, root development, periodontal parameters, gingival crevicular fluid VEGF levels, and complication rates were compared. All subjects underwent 6-month follow-up and were stratified into good and poor prognosis subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to screen for prognostic factors.

Results: After 6 months of therapy, Group A achieved a superior overall response rate, thicker root canal walls, longer root lengths, lower SBI, PLI, and PD, elevated gingival crevicular fluid bFGF and VEGF levels, and fewer complications (P < 0.05). All participants completed the 6-month follow-up and were categorized into poor-prognosis (n = 26) and good-prognosis (n = 122) cohorts. The poor-prognosis group had fewer regenerative endodontic procedure cases and larger apical lesion areas (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified treatment modality and apical lesion size as independent risk factors for an unfavorable prognosis (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Regenerative endodontic procedures are associated with favorable short-term (6-month) outcomes in immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis, including improved root development and repair, a more favorable periodontal microenvironment, increased levels of repair-related cytokines, and fewer complications. The treatment modality and extent of the apical lesion were associated with prognosis. Individualized treatment decisions should consider the apical lesion characteristics and clinical status of the affected tooth to optimize outcomes in pediatric patients.

再生根管治疗伴有根尖周炎的未成熟恒牙的临床疗效及预后因素分析。
目的:探讨再生根管治疗未成熟恒牙根尖周炎的临床效果,并分析影响预后的因素。方法:回顾性分析我院2022年1月~ 2025年12月收治的148例未成熟恒牙根尖周炎患者的临床资料。患者平均分为A组(再生根管治疗,74例)和B组(根尖治疗,74例)。比较临床疗效、牙根发育、牙周参数、龈沟液VEGF水平及并发症发生率。所有患者随访6个月,分为预后良好和预后不良亚组。采用多因素logistic回归筛选预后因素。结果:治疗6个月后,A组总有效率更高,根管壁更厚,根长度更长,SBI、PLI和PD更低,龈沟液bFGF和VEGF水平升高,并发症更少(P = 26),预后良好(n = 122)。预后不良组再生根管治疗病例较少,根尖病变面积较大(P P结论:再生根管治疗与根尖牙炎未成熟恒牙的短期(6个月)预后良好相关,包括根发育和修复改善,更有利的牙周微环境,修复相关细胞因子水平增加,并发症减少。根尖病变的治疗方式和程度与预后有关。个体化治疗决策应考虑患儿的根尖病变特征和患牙的临床状况,以优化患儿的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书